15 U.S.C. § 1381

Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, § 7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 246 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1967–2024 · leading case: Wyeth v. Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009).
Wyeth v. Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009). · cites it 6× “718 , 15 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. (1988 ed.), the Department of Transportation (DOT) had promulgated a Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard that "required auto manufacturers to equip some but not all of their 1987 vehicles with passive restraints.”
Motor Veh. Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983). · cites it 4× “718 , as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1381 et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp.”
Geier v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000). · cites it 5× “718 , 15 U. S. C. § 1381 et seq. (1988 ed.). The standard, FMVSS 208, required auto manufacturers to equip some but not all of their *865 1987 vehicles with passive restraints.”
Drattel v. Toyota Motor Corp., 699 N.E.2d 376 (NY 1998). · cites it 12× “In 1966, Congress enacted the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (former 15 USC § 1381 et seq. [recodified in 49 USC § 30101 et seq.”
Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind v. United Airlines Inc., 813 F.3d 718 (9th Cir. 2016). · cites it 2× “That case concerned preemption under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (“Safety Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1381 (1988), repealed by Pub.”
Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick, 514 U.S. 280 (1995). · cites it 2× “718, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1381 et seq., and its implementing regulations.”
MCI Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Hinton, 329 S.W.3d 475 (Tex. 2010). · cites it 2× “Each standard shall be practicable, meet the need for motor vehicle safety, and be stated in objective terms." 49 U.S.C. § 30111 (a). A motor vehicle safety standard is "a minimum standard for motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment performance.”
Hyundai Motor Co. v. Alvarado, 974 S.W.2d 1 (Tex. 1998). · cites it 5× “” 15 U.S.C. § 1381 1 (recodified at 49 U.S.”
Cellucci v. Gen. Motors Corp., 676 A.2d 253 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1996). · cites it 7× “The issue is whether the instant products liability action against appellant General Motors Corporation ("GM") is preempted by the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, 15 U.”
Cipollone v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992). “Ante, at 519 (quoting 15 U. S. C. § 1381 (2)). The narrow scope of federal pre-emption is thus apparent from the statutory text, and it is correspondingly impossible to divine any “clear and manifest purpose” on the part of Congress to pre-empt common-law damages actions.”
Premium Mortg. Corp. v. Equifax, Inc., 583 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2009). “The Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. requires a mortgage broker seeking to purchase a credit report to disclose the reason for its purchase.”
Cooper v. Gen. Motors Corp., 702 So. 2d 428 (Miss. 1997). · cites it 4× “" 15 U.S.C. § 1381 . The Act requires the Secretary of Transportation to establish "appropriate Federal motor vehicle safety standards.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.