15 U.S.C. § 2803
Trial and interim franchises
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2022 · leading case: Ewing v. Amoco Oil Co.
Ewing v. Amoco Oil Co. (1987)
“See 15 U.S.C. § 2803 . The provisions of the PMPA that expressly restrict the ability of franchisors to terminate or fail to renew, 15 U.”
Esquivel v. Exxon Co., USA (1988)
“15 U.S.C. § 2803 (a)(1). The only requirement for terminating a trial franchise is that proper notice be given, pursuant to § 2804, at the conclusion at the initial term of the trial franchise.”
California Service Station and Automotive Repair Ass'n v. Union Oil Co. (1991)
“( 15 U.S.C. § 2803 (b)(1)(C).) The good cause requirement for nonrenewal or termination of a regular franchise is not required for terminating a trial franchise.”
Wojciechowski v. Amoco Oil Co. (1980)
“” 15 U.S.C. § 2803 (b)(l)(D)(iii). As indicated earlier, defendant sent a notice to plaintiff on September 6, 1979.”
Jimico Enterprises, Inc. v. Lehigh Gas Corp. (2013)
“” 15 U.S.C. § 2803 (b)(1). 5 Between July 28, 2006, and April 1, 2007, without any notice, Lehigh terminated 6 its franchises with Jimieo and Brownson— first with Jimico’s two Angola stations, then with Brownson’s two New Baltimore stations, and finally with Jimico’s Seneca…”
Consumers Petroleum Co. v. Texaco, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (1986)
“” 15 U.S.C. § 2803 (b)(3). An interim franchise is, therefore, a franchise entered under a separate contract and independent of the prior franchise.”
Jeetendra L. Shukla, Individually v. Bp Exploration & Oil, Inc., A.K.A. Bp Oil Company, Petro Distributing, Inc. (1997)
“See 15 U.S.C. § 2803 (a)(1), (c)(1). Section 2804 provides that, in the absence of extenuating circumstances, the franchisor must provide the franchisee with written notice of its intention not to renew at least 90 days prior to the effective date of termination of the franchise.”
Coast Village, Inc. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC (2001)
“See 15 U.S.C. § 2803 (b)(1). (i) Provisions in both the RFL and the RSA requiring that lessees, in the event that they do sell, transfer, or otherwise assign their rights under the agreements), pay Equilon a transfer fee prior to or at the closing of the transfer (the “Transfer…”
Pearman v. Texaco, Inc. (1979)
“See 15 U.S.C. § 2803 . The testimony presented by Texaco was that as standard policy all new franchisees are offered an initial one year lease.”
Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USA (1991)
“15 U.S.C. § 2803 (a). As exceptions to this general rule, the PMPA provides two grounds on which a franchisor may terminate or fail to renew a franchise due to failure to perform on the part of the franchisee.”
Byron J. Freeman v. Bp Oil, Inc., Gulf Products Division (1988)
“See 15 U.S.C. § 2803 (a)(1), (c)(1) (1982). If the franchise was not a trial franchise, however, BP was required both to justify its nonrenewal under section 2802 and give the notice of nonrenewal required by section 2804.”
Santiago-Sepulveda v. Esso Standard Oil Co. (Puerto Rico), Inc. (2008)
“15 U.S.C. § 2803 (b)(1)(C). Along with the other dealers, he received notice of termination of market withdrawal in March 2008.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 2803(c)(1) — 1 case
Esquivel v. Exxon Co., USA (1988)
“15 U.S.C. § 2803 (a)(1). The only requirement for terminating a trial franchise is that proper notice be given, pursuant to § 2804, at the conclusion at the initial term of the trial franchise.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.