U.S. Code » Title 15 » Chapter CHAPTER 16B— FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION

15 U.S.C. § 783

Hydroelectric generating facilities; lists, transmittal to Congress; construction schedule and cost estimates for expedited construction program; prospective accomplishments from expedited completion of facilities; statement of appropriated but not obligated funds

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
Within ninety days of the effective date of this chapter, the Administrator of the Federal Energy Administration, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army, shall—(1) transmit to the Congress—(A) a list of hydroelectric generating facilities and electric power transmission facilities which have been authorized for construction by the Congress and which are not yet completed, and(B) a list of opportunities to increase the capacity of existing hydroelectric generating facilities, and(2) provide, for each such facility which is listed—(A) a construction schedule and cost estimates for an expedited construction program which would make the facility available for service at the earliest practicable date, and(B) a statement of the accomplishments which could be provided by the expedited completion of each facility and a statement of any funds which have been appropriated but not yet obligated.(Pub. L. 93–275, § 24, May 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 114.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesTransfer of Functions

Federal Energy Administration terminated and functions vested by law in Administrator thereof transferred to Secretary of Energy (unless otherwise specifically provided) by sections 7151(a) and 7293 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 129 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2021 · leading case: ATSI Commc'ns, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd., 493 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
ATSI Commc'ns, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd., 493 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2007). “ATSI alleges that the defendants made misrepresentations in connection with securities transactions and engaged in market manipulation in violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 783 (b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17…”
In Re Initial Pub. Offering Sec. Litig., 241 F. Supp. 2d 281 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). · cites it 2× “¶¶ 93-103; see also 15 U.S.C. § 783 (b); 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5.”
Carl Schwartz v. Arena Pharm., Inc., 840 F.3d 698 (9th Cir. 2016). “Background Legal Principles Under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. § 783 (b)) and SEC Rule 10b-5 ( 17 C.”
United States v. Rigas, 490 F.3d 208 (2d Cir. 2007). “§ 371 (Count One) and securities fraud under 15 U.S.C. §§ 783 (b) and 78ff; 17 C.F.R. § 240 .”
OFI Asset Mgmt. v. Cooper Tire & Rubber, 834 F.3d 481 (3rd Cir. 2016). “) Its amended complaint (the “Complaint”) alleges that Cooper violated Sections 10(b), 14(a), and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “’34 Act”), codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 783 (b), 78n(a), and 78t(a).”
Starnes Canale Funeral Directors v. Regions Morgan Keegan Select, 821 F.3d 780 (6th Cir. 2016). “§§ 77k, 111, and 77o, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 783 (b) hnd 78t(a),"and SEC'Rule 10b-5, 17 C.”
Atlantica Holdings, Inc. v. Sovereign Wealth Fund Samruk-Kazyna JSC, 813 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2016). “881 (codified in relevant part at 15 U.S.C. §§ 783 (b), 78t(a)). The district court (Jesse M.”
Bradley v. ARIAD Pharm., Inc., 842 F.3d 744 (1st Cir. 2016). “, investors filed suit against the company and four corporate officers (together “ARIAD”), alleging securities fraud in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 783 (b) and 78t(a), as well as the Securities and…”
In Re Advanta Corp. Sec. Litig., 180 F.3d 525 (3rd Cir. 1999). “Count I of the complaint alleges the defendants are liable under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 783 (b) (West Supp.1999), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.”
DeJulius v. New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund, 429 F.3d 935 (10th Cir. 2005). “The consolidated complaint alleged that Sprint made false and misleading statements in connection with the WorldCom merger, in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 783 (b) (2000), and SEC Rule lob-5, 17 C.”
In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Lit., 235 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D. Tex. 2002). “§§ 77k and 77o; (2) under Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act” or “the 1934 Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 783 (b), 78t(a), and 78t-l, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), 17 C.”
Arkansas Teachers Ret. Sys. v. Goldman Sachs Grp., Inc., 879 F.3d 474 (2d Cir. 2018). “See 15 U.S.C. § 783 (b); 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5.”
Show all 129 citing cases →
— 15 U.S.C. § 783(b) — 1 case
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,361 Louis v. Jackvony, Jr. v. Riht Fin. Corp., Etc., John R. Cioci v. Riht Fin. Corp., Etc., 873 F.2d 411 (1st Cir. 1989).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.