15 U.S.C. § 7903

Definitions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

In this chapter:(1) Engaged in the business

The term “engaged in the business” has the meaning given that term in section 921(a)(21) of title 18, and, as applied to a seller of ammunition, means a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to the sale of ammunition as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the sale or distribution of ammunition.

(2) Manufacturer

The term “manufacturer” means, with respect to a qualified product, a person who is engaged in the business of manufacturing the product in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such a manufacturer under chapter 44 of title 18.

(3) Person

The term “person” means any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, or any other entity, including any governmental entity.

(4) Qualified product

The term “qualified product” means a firearm (as defined in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 921(a)(3) of title 18), including any antique firearm (as defined in section 921(a)(16) of such title), or ammunition (as defined in section 921(a)(17)(A) of such title), or a component part of a firearm or ammunition, that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

(5) Qualified civil liability action(A) In generalThe term “qualified civil liability action” means a civil action or proceeding or an administrative proceeding brought by any person against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or a trade association, for damages, punitive damages, injunctive or declaratory relief, abatement, restitution, fines, or penalties, or other relief, resulting from the criminal or unlawful misuse of a qualified product by the person or a third party, but shall not include—(i) an action brought against a transferor convicted under section 924(h) of title 18, or a comparable or identical State felony law, by a party directly harmed by the conduct of which the transferee is so convicted;(ii) an action brought against a seller for negligent entrustment or negligence per se;(iii) an action in which a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product knowingly violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product, and the violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought, including—(I) any case in which the manufacturer or seller knowingly made any false entry in, or failed to make appropriate entry in, any record required to be kept under Federal or State law with respect to the qualified product, or aided, abetted, or conspired with any person in making any false or fictitious oral or written statement with respect to any fact material to the lawfulness of the sale or other disposition of a qualified product; or(II) any case in which the manufacturer or seller aided, abetted, or conspired with any other person to sell or otherwise dispose of a qualified product, knowing, or having reasonable cause to believe, that the actual buyer of the qualified product was prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm or ammunition under subsection (g) or (n) of section 922 of title 18;(iv) an action for breach of contract or warranty in connection with the purchase of the product;(v) an action for death, physical injuries or property damage resulting directly from a defect in design or manufacture of the product, when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable manner, except that where the discharge of the product was caused by a volitional act that constituted a criminal offense, then such act shall be considered the sole proximate cause of any resulting death, personal injuries or property damage; or(vi) an action or proceeding commenced by the Attorney General to enforce the provisions of chapter 44 of title 18 or chapter 53 of title 26.(B) Negligent entrustment

As used in subparagraph (A)(ii), the term “negligent entrustment” means the supplying of a qualified product by a seller for use by another person when the seller knows, or reasonably should know, the person to whom the product is supplied is likely to, and does, use the product in a manner involving unreasonable risk of physical injury to the person or others.

The exceptions enumerated under clauses (i) through (v) of subparagraph (A) shall be construed so as not to be in conflict, and no provision of this chapter shall be construed to create a public or private cause of action or remedy.

(D) Minor child exception

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the right of a person under 17 years of age to recover damages authorized under Federal or State law in a civil action that meets 1 of the requirements under clauses (i) through (v) of subparagraph (A).

(6) SellerThe term “seller” means, with respect to a qualified product—(A) an importer (as defined in section 921(a)(9) of title 18) who is engaged in the business as such an importer in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such an importer under chapter 44 of title 18;(B) a dealer (as defined in section 921(a)(11) of title 18) who is engaged in the business as such a dealer in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such a dealer under chapter 44 of title 18; or(C) a person engaged in the business of selling ammunition (as defined in section 921(a)(17)(A) of title 18) in interstate or foreign commerce at the wholesale or retail level.(7) State

The term “State” includes each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States, and any political subdivision of any such place.

(8) Trade associationThe term “trade association” means—(A) any corporation, unincorporated association, federation, business league, professional or business organization not organized or operated for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual;(B) that is an organization described in section 501(c)(6) of title 26 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such title; and(C) 2 or more members of which are manufacturers or sellers of a qualified product.(9) Unlawful misuse

The term “unlawful misuse” means conduct that violates a statute, ordinance, or regulation as it relates to the use of a qualified product.

(Pub. L. 109–92, § 4, Oct. 26, 2005, 119 Stat. 2097.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 109–92, Oct. 26, 2005, 119 Stat. 2095, known as the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7901 of this title and Tables.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 82 cases (37 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case: Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms Int'l, LLC, 202 A.3d 262 (Conn. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms Int'l, LLC, 202 A.3d 262 (Conn. 2019). · cites it 36× “See 15 U.S.C. § 7903 (5) (B) (2012). 19 The plaintiffs challenge both conclusions on appeal.”

City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 524 F.3d 384 (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 24× “15 U.S.C. § 7903 (5)(A). On the day the PLCAA was enacted, the Firearms Suppliers moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint pursuant to section 7902(b).”

Ileto v. Glock, Inc., 565 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 26× “" 15 U.S.C. § 7903 (5)(A)(iii). In City of New York , for instance, the plaintiffs brought a common-law public nuisance claim (the cause of action) and also alleged that the defendants knowingly violated a state criminal statute (the predicate statute).”

Adames v. Sheahan, 909 N.E.2d 742 (Ill. 2009). · cites it 9× “” 15 U.S.C. §7903 (5)(A) (2006). A “qualified product” means a firearm, or ammunition, or a component part of a firearm or ammunition, “that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.”

Est. of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. Coxe, 295 P.3d 380 (Alaska 2013). · cites it 8× “15 U.S.C. § 7903 (5)(A)Gi)-Gii). 4 . - Kalenka v.”

KS&E Sports & Edward J. Ellis v. Dwayne H. Runnels, 72 N.E.3d 892 (Ind. 2017). · cites it 4× “, 15 U.S.C. § 7903 (5)(A)(iii) (2012) (withholding immunity where firearms 6 seller “knowingly violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the [firearm], and the violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought”); Colo.”

Chavez v. Glock, Inc., 207 Cal. App. 4th 1283 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 5× “” ( 15 U.S.C. § 7903 (5)(A).) In keeping with the purpose of the Act to shield the firearm industry from liability when the product is properly designed and functions as intended, product defect actions are excluded from the definition of qualified civil liability actions unless…”

City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC, 645 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “" 15 U.S.C. § 7903 (4). [12] Although, in the district court proceedings, various defendants asserted that the PLCAA barred suit against them, see A-1 Jewelry II, 247 F.”

Ileto v. Glock, Inc., 421 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (C.D. Cal. 2006). · cites it 7× “See 15 U.S.C. § 7903 (5)(A)(iii)(I)-(II). 11 Because these examples refer only to State and Federal laws exclusive to the firearms industry, they strongly suggest that the word “applicable” in the lines preceding them likewise refers to State and Federal laws governing only…”

Dist. of Columbia v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 940 A.2d 163 (D.C. 2008). · cites it 4× “statute applicable to the sale or marketing of’ a firearm, 15 U.S.C. § 7903 (5)(A)(in), then it is a “qualified civil liability action” that must be dismissed, unless the Constitution dictates otherwise.”

Phillips v. Lucky Gunner, LLC, 84 F. Supp. 3d 1216 (D. Colo. 2015). · cites it 7× “” 15 U.S.C. § 7903 (5)(A). A “qualified product” includes ammunition as defined in 18 U.”

Smith & Wesson Corp. v. City of Gary, 875 N.E.2d 422 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 6× “any case in which the manufacturer or seller aided, abetted, or conspired with any other person to sell or otherwise dispose of a qualified product, knowing, or having reasonable cause to believe, that the actual buyer of the qualified product was prohibited from possessing or…”

Show all 82 citing cases →

— 15 U.S.C. § 7903(5)(A) — 1 case

Summers v. Cabela's Wholesale, Inc. (Del. Super. Ct. 2019).

— 15 U.S.C. § 7903(5)(A)(iii) — 2 cases

Parsons v. Colt's Mfg. Co., LLC (nrap 5), 2021 NV 72 (Nev. 2021).

Summers v. Cabela's Wholesale, Inc. (Del. Super. Ct. 2019).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.