16 U.S.C. § 1

SHORT TITLE.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

“This Act may be cited as the ‘National Cave and Karst Research Institute Act of 1998’.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 272 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1937–2026 · leading case: Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F. Supp. 2d 76 (D.D.C. 2012).
Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F. Supp. 2d 76 (D.D.C. 2012). · cites it 5× “ntiffs challenge the framework for this decisionmaking, as embodied in three site-specific final actions exempting directional drilling activities in and around Big Thicket National Preserve in Texas, alleging that NPS failed to consider environmental impacts from oil and gas…”
Clark v. Cmty. for Creative Non-Violence, 468 U.S. 288 (1984). · cites it 4× “*290 16 U. S. C. §§ 1 , 1a-1, 3. [1] The network of National Parks includes the National Memorial-core parks, Lafayette Park and the Mall, which are set in the heart of Washington, D.”
Kane Cnty., Utah v. United States, 928 F.3d 877 (10th Cir. 2019). · cites it 2× “at 284–85, 290 (noting that the Quiet Title Act “was necessary for protection of national public interests”).”
S. Utah Wilderness All. v. Nat'l Park Serv., 387 F. Supp. 2d 1178 (D. Utah 2005). · cites it 10× “In 1916, Congress passed the National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (the “Organic Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 1 , et seq. The Organic Act created the National Park Service (“NPS”), a new bureau within the Department of the Interior, for the purpose of: promoting] and regulating] the…”
United States v. Barry L. Brown, 364 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3× “natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.”
Donna Young v. United States, 769 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2014). · cites it 3× “16 U.S.C. § 1 . We have recognized that the Organic Act “sets forth the broad policy considerations that govern NPS’s management of national parks” and that, under the Organic Act, “[m]uch of the NPS’s work is ‘grounded’ in [a] broad mandate to balance conservation and access.”
Buono v. Kempthorne, 527 F.3d 758 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 6× “§ 431 (authority to declare national monuments expressly limited to objects "situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States"); see also 16 U.S.C. § 1 ("The service thus established shall promote and regulate the use of the Federal areas known…”
Terbush v. United States, 516 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “AppliCation Of The Discretionary Function Exception To The Terbushes’ Claims Before discussing the Terbushes’ specific claims, as an initial matter we note that the authority for the NPS’s work is grounded in the Organic Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1 , which sets forth the broad policy…”
S. Utah Wilderness All. v. Dabney, 222 F.3d 819 (10th Cir. 2000). · cites it 5× “§§ 4321-4370 ; the National Park Service Organic Act (“the Organic Act” or “the Act”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1 -18Q); and the Canyonlands National Park Enabling Act, 16 U.”
San Juan Cnty., Utah v. United States, 503 F.3d 1163 (10th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “See 16 U.S.C. §§ 1 , 1a-1, 271d. The United States will have to take all these multiple interests into account when it develops its litigation strategy, and it may very well take the position that if a right-of-way easement does exist, it may be broad enough to encompass some…”
Alaska v. United States, 545 U.S. 75 (2005). · cites it 4× “" 16 U. S. C. § 1 . From these two premises it would require little additional effort to reach a holding that the Antiquities Act itself delegated to the President sufficient power not only to reserve submerged lands but also to defeat a future State's title to them.”
United States v. Garfield Cnty., 122 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (D. Utah 2000). · cites it 8× “408, 39 Stat 535 (1916), noni codified as amended at 16 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 et seq. (1992), Congress created the National Park Service and delegated part of its constitutional power to the Secretary of the Interior, authorizing the Secretary to “make and publish such rules and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.