If wild free-roaming horses or burros stray from public lands onto privately owned land, the owners of such land may inform the nearest Federal marshall or agent of the Secretary, who shall arrange to have the animals removed. In no event shall such wild free-roaming horses and burros be destroyed except by the agents of the Secretary. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a private landowner from maintaining wild free-roaming horses or burros on his private lands, or lands leased from the Government, if he does so in a manner that protects them from harassment, and if the animals were not willfully removed or enticed from the public lands. Any individuals who maintain such wild free-roaming horses or burros on their private lands or lands leased from the Government shall notify the appropriate agent of the Secretary and supply him with a reasonable approximation of the number of animals so maintained.
Notes of Decisions
Western Rangeland Conservation Ass'n v. Zinke (2017)
utd · cites it 7×
“See 16 U.S.C. § 1334 . II. INTERACTION OF WHA WITH FLPMA AND NEPA BLM makes management déterrriina-tions and conducts necessary removals' in compliance with both the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (“FLPMA”), 43 U.”
Kleppe v. New Mexico (1976)
scotus · cites it 3×
“” 1 § 4, 16 U. S. C. § 1334 (1970 ed., Supp. IV). Section 6, 16 U.”
Roaring Springs Associates v. Andrus (1978)
ord · cites it 3×
“They merit publication as the opinion of the judges for the District of Oregon on the proper interpretation of 16 U.S.C. § 1334 , at least in this context.”
Rock Springs Grazing Ass'n v. Salazar (2013)
wyd · cites it 3×
“It is *1182 clear, however, that Section 4 of the Wild Horses Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1334 (Section 4), entitles landowners to enjoy the use of their property unencumbered by wild horses, and provides them a specific remedy to remove the animals.”
Mitchell v. Collagen Corp. (1994)
innd
“While six of the nine Justices agreed that a “requirement or prohibition” includes state common law tort causes, no majority agreed on how to determine whether a tort requirement is “based on smoking and health.” 16 A plurality of four Justices decided that the answer depends on…”
Fallini v. Hodel (1986)
ca9
“In no event shall such wild free-roaming horses and burros be destroyed except by agents of the Secretary____ 16 U.S.C.A. § 1334 (1985) (emphasis added).”
American Horse Protection Ass'n v. Andrus (1978)
nvd
“Title 16 U.S.C. § 1334 provides: “If wild free-roaming horses or burros stray from public lands onto privately owned land, the owners of such land may inform the nearest Federal marshall or agent of the Secretary, who shall arrange to have the animals removed.”
Animal Protection Institute of America, Inc. v. Hodel (1987)
nvd
“] and die of natural causes before passage of title; or (3) upon destruction by the Secretary or his designee pursuant to subsection (b) of this section; or *697 (4) if they die of natural causes on the public lands or on private lands where maintained thereon pursuant to…”
Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Clark (1984)
ca10
“16 U.S.C. § 1334 (1982). Under some circumstances, even the Secretary may not issue a permit for the taking of eagles even if they do damage to animals and crops.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.