Notes of Decisions
Cited in
15
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case:
Franks v. Salazar, 816 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D.D.C. 2011).
Franks v. Salazar, 816 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D.D.C. 2011).
· cites it 2× “See 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(c)(2) (“[T]he Secretary .”
Defenders of Wildlife, Inc. v. The Endangered Species Sci. Auth., 725 F.2d 726 (D.C. Cir. 1984).
· cites it 2× “Because the district court correctly held that 16 U.S.C. § 1537a removed the basis for its injunction, and any further challenge to the federal defendants’ compliance with bobcat export regulations must be brought in a subsequent action, the opinion of the district court is…”
Castlewood Prods., L.L.C. v. Norton, 365 F.3d 1076 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
“See 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(a). In Brazil, -the Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renovaveis or the Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (also known as “IBAMA”) is the Management Authority under CITES.”
Marcum v. Salazar, 810 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D.D.C. 2011).
· cites it 2× “at 27-28 (citing 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(c)(2); Defenders of Wildlife v.”
WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 342 F. Supp. 3d 1047 (D. Mont. 2018).
“In the United States, the Service functions as both management and scientific authority for administering CITES, 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(a), and has used its rulemaking authority under the ESA, 16 U.”
Safari Club Int'l v. Jewell, 76 F. Supp. 3d 198 (D.D.C. 2014).
“16 U.S.C. §§ 1537a; 1538(c). The Fish and Wildlife Service’s Division of Scientific Authority is responsible for issuing non-detriment advices as required by CITES.”
United States v. Koczuk, 252 F.3d 91 (2d Cir. 2001).
· cites it 2× “§ 1538 (c), and directed the Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior to carry out the provisions of the Convention, see 16 U.S.C. §§ 1537a, 1540(f). Pursuant to this direction, the Fish and Wildlife Service has issued regulations incorporating the specific…”
Castlewood Prods. v. Norton, 264 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2003).
“Department of the Interior, see 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(a), but the ESA entrusts enforcement of export and import restrictions under CITES to the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, who has delegated authority to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (“APHIS”) of the…”
Dallas Safari Club v. Bernhardt (D.D.C. 2020).
“16 U.S.C. §§ 1537a, 1538(c). The ESA prohibits, among other things, importing into the United States species of fish and wildlife listed as endangered.”
Rowley v. City of New Bedford (D. Mass. 2019).
“The Fish and Wildlife Service, the agency within the United States Department of the Interior tasked with implementing the Endangered Species Act, see 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(a), has promulgated regulations defining the terms “harm” and “harass” in the context of the Endangered…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(a) — 6 cases
Castlewood Prods., L.L.C. v. Norton, 365 F.3d 1076 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
“See 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(a). In Brazil, -the Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renovaveis or the Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (also known as “IBAMA”) is the Management Authority under CITES.”
WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 342 F. Supp. 3d 1047 (D. Mont. 2018).
“In the United States, the Service functions as both management and scientific authority for administering CITES, 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(a), and has used its rulemaking authority under the ESA, 16 U.”
Castlewood Prods. v. Norton, 264 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2003).
“Department of the Interior, see 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(a), but the ESA entrusts enforcement of export and import restrictions under CITES to the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, who has delegated authority to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (“APHIS”) of the…”
Rowley v. City of New Bedford (D. Mass. 2019).
“The Fish and Wildlife Service, the agency within the United States Department of the Interior tasked with implementing the Endangered Species Act, see 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(a), has promulgated regulations defining the terms “harm” and “harass” in the context of the Endangered…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(b) — 1 case
— 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(c)(2) — 3 cases
Franks v. Salazar, 816 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D.D.C. 2011).
“See 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(c)(2) (“[T]he Secretary .”
Marcum v. Salazar, 810 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D.D.C. 2011).
“at 27-28 (citing 16 U.S.C. § 1537a(c)(2); Defenders of Wildlife v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.