16 U.S.C. § 460dd
Establishment; boundaries; publication in Federal Register
2003—Pub. L. 108–43 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted “1,256,000 acres” for “one million two hundred and thirty-six thousand eight hundred and eighty acres”, and added subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 108–43, § 1,
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2024 · leading case: Great Old Broads for Wilderness v. Kempthorne, 452 F. Supp. 2d 71 (D.D.C. 2006).
Great Old Broads for Wilderness v. Kempthorne, 452 F. Supp. 2d 71 (D.D.C. 2006). “Plaintiffs contend that the agencies have issued grazing permits and a management plan in violation the Glen Canyon Enabling Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460dd et seq.; the Park Service Organic Act, 16 U.”
Nat. Arch & Bridge Soc'y v. Alston, 209 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (D. Utah 2002). “The federal lands adjacent to Lake Powell, other than the monument, comprise the Glen Canyon National Recreational Area, 16 U.S.C. § 460dd (2000), and are administered by the National Park Service.”
Sierra Club v. Andrus, 487 F. Supp. 443 (D.D.C. 1980). “(1976); the Glen Canyon National Recreational Area Act of 1972, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § 460dd et seq. (1976); and the Federal Lands Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended, 43 U.”
Badoni v. Higginson, 638 F.2d 172 (10th Cir. 1980). “The federal lands adjacent to Lake Powell, other than the Monument, comprise the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, see 16 U.S.C. § 460dd, and are administered by the National Park Service.”
Lunsford v. US Nat'l Park Serv. (D. Utah 2024). “Historically, NPS has managed GLCA to allow for a wide variety of recreational activities.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 460dd(a) — 2 cases
Great Old Broads for Wilderness v. Kempthorne, 452 F. Supp. 2d 71 (D.D.C. 2006). “Plaintiffs contend that the agencies have issued grazing permits and a management plan in violation the Glen Canyon Enabling Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460dd et seq.; the Park Service Organic Act, 16 U.”
Lunsford v. US Nat'l Park Serv. (D. Utah 2024). “Historically, NPS has managed GLCA to allow for a wide variety of recreational activities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.