16 U.S.C. § 470a
Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, § 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 69
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1969–2024 · leading case: Te-Moak Tribe of W. Shoshone v. United States Dep't of Interior, 608 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2010).
Te-Moak Tribe of W. Shoshone v. United States Dep't of Interior, 608 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2010). “Early consultation with tribes is encouraged by the regulations “to ensure that all types of historic properties and all public interests in such properties are given due consideration----” 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(1)(A); cf. Pit River Tribe, 469 F.”
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Slater, 167 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D.D.C. 2001). “As NMA notes, “eligible for inclusion in the National Register” is a term of art, based on regulations issued by the National Park Service (“NPS”) of the Department of the Interior pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 470a. Those regulations were “developed to assist federal agencies in…”
Sierra Club v. Sally Jewell, 764 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “See 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(6); 36 C.F.R. § 60.6 (g).”
120 West Fayette Street, LLLP v. Mayor of Baltimore, 43 A.3d 355 (Md. 2012). “Each agency shall undertake, consistent with the preservation of such properties and the mission of the agency and the professional standards established pursuant to section 101(g) [16 USCS § 470a(g)], any preservation, as may be necessary to carry out this section.”
Shanks v. Dressel, 540 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2008). “See 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a). It is architeetur *1085 ally noteworthy because it includes a “significant collection of late 19th and early 20th century houses located on one of the city’s oldest landscaped boulevards.”
Stop H-3 Ass'n, & Hui Malama Aina O Ko'olau v. William T. Coleman, Jr., as Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Transp., 533 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1976). “16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(l) (1970). The National Register, which includes properties of State and local, as well as national, historic significance, is intended to provide a “ .”
Sierra Club v. Salazar, 177 F. Supp. 3d 512 (D.D.C. 2016). “See 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(2)(A) (2006). Listing, by contrast, refers to the addition of “[n]ominations .”
Friends of the Atglen-Susquehanna Trail, Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd. & United States of Am., 252 F.3d 246 (3rd Cir. 2001). “16 (v); see also 16 U.S.C. § 470a(b)(3) (establishing the responsibilities of the SHPO).”
Nat'l Trust for Historic Pres. v. Blanck, 938 F. Supp. 908 (D.D.C. 1996). “16 U.S.C. §§ 470a(a)(6), (a)(7), (b), (f), (g).”
Barcelo v. Brown, 478 F. Supp. 646 (D.P.R. 1979). “” 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(l). The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is eligible to have listings in the National Register (16 U.”
Slockish v. United States Fed. High. Admin., 682 F. Supp. 2d 1178 (D. Or. 2010). “Section 106, codified at 16 USC § 470f, requires federal agencies to “take into account the effect of any undertaking on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register” prior to expending federal funds on…”
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 194 F. Supp. 2d 977 (D.S.D. 2002). “Ultimately, the Secretary of the Interior has the responsibility for determining whether a property is included on *992 the National Register, and the Secretary has not been given the opportunity to decide whether the St.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(1)(A) — 1 case
St. Charles Assocs., Ltd. v. United States, 671 F. Supp. 1074 (D. Maryland 1987).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a) — 4 cases
Shanks v. Dressel, 540 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2008). “See 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a). It is architeetur *1085 ally noteworthy because it includes a “significant collection of late 19th and early 20th century houses located on one of the city’s oldest landscaped boulevards.”
Ely v. Velde, 321 F. Supp. 1088 (E.D. Va. 1971).
Byrd v. Dressel (9th Cir. 2008).
Proposed Coop. Agreement for the Admin. of the San Antonio Missions Nat'l Historical Park (OLC 1982).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(1) — 1 case
Save the Courthouse Comm. v. Lynn, 408 F. Supp. 1323 (S.D.N.Y. 1975).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(1)(A) — 1 case
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(2)(A) — 1 case
Sierra Club v. Salazar, 177 F. Supp. 3d 512 (D.D.C. 2016). “See 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(2)(A) (2006). Listing, by contrast, refers to the addition of “[n]ominations .”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(4) — 1 case
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Slater, 167 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D.D.C. 2001). “As NMA notes, “eligible for inclusion in the National Register” is a term of art, based on regulations issued by the National Park Service (“NPS”) of the Department of the Interior pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 470a. Those regulations were “developed to assist federal agencies in…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(5) — 3 cases
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 194 F. Supp. 2d 977 (D.S.D. 2002). “Ultimately, the Secretary of the Interior has the responsibility for determining whether a property is included on *992 the National Register, and the Secretary has not been given the opportunity to decide whether the St.”
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 396 F. Supp. 2d 1087 (D.S.D. 2005).
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Slater, 167 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D.D.C. 2001). “As NMA notes, “eligible for inclusion in the National Register” is a term of art, based on regulations issued by the National Park Service (“NPS”) of the Department of the Interior pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 470a. Those regulations were “developed to assist federal agencies in…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(6) — 4 cases
Sierra Club v. Sally Jewell, 764 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “See 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(6); 36 C.F.R. § 60.6 (g).”
Nat'l Trust for Historic Pres. v. Blanck, 938 F. Supp. 908 (D.D.C. 1996). “16 U.S.C. §§ 470a(a)(6), (a)(7), (b), (f), (g).”
Sierra Club v. Salazar, 894 F. Supp. 2d 97 (D.D.C. 2012).
Prentiss v. City of South Pasadena, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3097 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(l) — 3 cases
Stop H-3 Ass'n, & Hui Malama Aina O Ko'olau v. William T. Coleman, Jr., as Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Transp., 533 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1976). “16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(l) (1970). The National Register, which includes properties of State and local, as well as national, historic significance, is intended to provide a “ .”
Barcelo v. Brown, 478 F. Supp. 646 (D.P.R. 1979). “” 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(l). The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is eligible to have listings in the National Register (16 U.”
White v. Shull, 520 F. Supp. 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(l)(A) — 3 cases
Sierra Club v. Salazar, 177 F. Supp. 3d 512 (D.D.C. 2016). “See 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(2)(A) (2006). Listing, by contrast, refers to the addition of “[n]ominations .”
Historic Boardwalk Hall, LLC v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 694 F.3d 425 (3rd Cir. 2012).
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Slater, 167 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D.D.C. 2001). “As NMA notes, “eligible for inclusion in the National Register” is a term of art, based on regulations issued by the National Park Service (“NPS”) of the Department of the Interior pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 470a. Those regulations were “developed to assist federal agencies in…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(b) — 2 cases
Sheridan Kalorama Historical Ass'n v. Christopher, 49 F.3d 750 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
Lee v. Thornburgh, 707 F. Supp. 600 (D.D.C. 1989).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(b)(1) — 1 case
Barcelo v. Brown, 478 F. Supp. 646 (D.P.R. 1979). “” 16 U.S.C. § 470a(a)(l). The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is eligible to have listings in the National Register (16 U.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(b)(3) — 2 cases
Friends of the Atglen-Susquehanna Trail, Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd. & United States of Am., 252 F.3d 246 (3rd Cir. 2001). “16 (v); see also 16 U.S.C. § 470a(b)(3) (establishing the responsibilities of the SHPO).”
Comm. to Save Cleveland's Huletts v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 163 F. Supp. 2d 776 (N.D. Ohio 2001).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(b)(3)(A) — 1 case
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Slater, 167 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D.D.C. 2001). “As NMA notes, “eligible for inclusion in the National Register” is a term of art, based on regulations issued by the National Park Service (“NPS”) of the Department of the Interior pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 470a. Those regulations were “developed to assist federal agencies in…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(b)(3)(I) — 1 case
West Alabama Quality of Life Coalition v. Unites States Fed. High. Admin., 302 F. Supp. 2d 672 (S.D. Tex. 2004).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(b)(l) — 1 case
Friends of the Atglen-Susquehanna Trail, Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd. & United States of Am., 252 F.3d 246 (3rd Cir. 2001). “16 (v); see also 16 U.S.C. § 470a(b)(3) (establishing the responsibilities of the SHPO).”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(c)(4) — 1 case
Suhre v. Haywood Cnty., NC, 55 F. Supp. 2d 384 (W.D.N.C. 1999).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d) — 1 case
New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 459 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (D.N.M. 2006).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(1)(A) — 3 cases
Te-Moak Tribe of W. Shoshone v. United States Dep't of Interior, 608 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2010). “Early consultation with tribes is encouraged by the regulations “to ensure that all types of historic properties and all public interests in such properties are given due consideration----” 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(1)(A); cf. Pit River Tribe, 469 F.”
WildEarth Guardians v. Provencio, 272 F. Supp. 3d 1136 (D. Ariz. 2017).
Slockish v. US Fed. High. Admin., 664 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (D. Or. 2009).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(2) — 1 case
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Buford Rollin, 119 F.4th 881 (11th Cir. 2024).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(2)(B) — 1 case
San Juan Citizens All. v. Norton, 586 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (D.N.M. 2008).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(6) — 7 cases
Pub. Employees for Env't Responsibility v. Beaudreau, 25 F. Supp. 3d 67 (D.D.C. 2014).
Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon v. Impson, 462 F. Supp. 2d 86 (D. Me. 2006).
Slockish v. United States Fed. High. Admin., 682 F. Supp. 2d 1178 (D. Or. 2010). “Section 106, codified at 16 USC § 470f, requires federal agencies to “take into account the effect of any undertaking on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register” prior to expending federal funds on…”
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. U.S. Forest Serv., 177 F.3d 800 (9th Cir. 1999).
Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Serv., 479 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2007).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(6)(A) — 7 cases
Te-Moak Tribe of W. Shoshone v. United States Dep't of Interior, 608 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2010). “Early consultation with tribes is encouraged by the regulations “to ensure that all types of historic properties and all public interests in such properties are given due consideration----” 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(1)(A); cf. Pit River Tribe, 469 F.”
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Slater, 167 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D.D.C. 2001). “As NMA notes, “eligible for inclusion in the National Register” is a term of art, based on regulations issued by the National Park Service (“NPS”) of the Department of the Interior pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 470a. Those regulations were “developed to assist federal agencies in…”
Slockish v. United States Fed. High. Admin., 682 F. Supp. 2d 1178 (D. Or. 2010). “Section 106, codified at 16 USC § 470f, requires federal agencies to “take into account the effect of any undertaking on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register” prior to expending federal funds on…”
Nat. Arch & Bridge Soc'y v. Alston, 209 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (D. Utah 2002).
Bear Lodge Multiple Use Ass'n v. Babbitt, 175 F.3d 814 (10th Cir. 1999).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(6)(B) — 3 cases
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Slater, 167 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D.D.C. 2001). “As NMA notes, “eligible for inclusion in the National Register” is a term of art, based on regulations issued by the National Park Service (“NPS”) of the Department of the Interior pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 470a. Those regulations were “developed to assist federal agencies in…”
Montana Wilderness Ass'n v. Fry, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1127 (D. Mont. 2004).
Winnemem Wintu Tribe v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 725 F. Supp. 2d 1119 (E.D. Cal. 2010).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(l)(A) — 4 cases
Te-Moak Tribe of W. Shoshone v. United States Dep't of Interior, 608 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2010). “Early consultation with tribes is encouraged by the regulations “to ensure that all types of historic properties and all public interests in such properties are given due consideration----” 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(1)(A); cf. Pit River Tribe, 469 F.”
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 755 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (S.D. Cal. 2010).
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Slater, 167 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D.D.C. 2001). “As NMA notes, “eligible for inclusion in the National Register” is a term of art, based on regulations issued by the National Park Service (“NPS”) of the Department of the Interior pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 470a. Those regulations were “developed to assist federal agencies in…”
Slockish v. United States Fed. High. Admin., 682 F. Supp. 2d 1178 (D. Or. 2010). “Section 106, codified at 16 USC § 470f, requires federal agencies to “take into account the effect of any undertaking on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register” prior to expending federal funds on…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(e)(3) — 1 case
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(e)(4) — 1 case
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(g) — 3 cases
120 West Fayette Street, LLLP v. Mayor of Baltimore, 43 A.3d 355 (Md. 2012). “Each agency shall undertake, consistent with the preservation of such properties and the mission of the agency and the professional standards established pursuant to section 101(g) [16 USCS § 470a(g)], any preservation, as may be necessary to carry out this section.”
Nat'l Trust for Historic Pres. v. Blanck, 938 F. Supp. 908 (D.D.C. 1996). “16 U.S.C. §§ 470a(a)(6), (a)(7), (b), (f), (g).”
Okinawa Dugong v. Gates, 543 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (N.D. Cal. 2008).
— 16 U.S.C. § 470a(h) — 1 case
120 West Fayette Street, LLLP v. Mayor of Baltimore, 43 A.3d 355 (Md. 2012). “Each agency shall undertake, consistent with the preservation of such properties and the mission of the agency and the professional standards established pursuant to section 101(g) [16 USCS § 470a(g)], any preservation, as may be necessary to carry out this section.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.