16 U.S.C. § 5104
State implementation of coastal fishery management plans
The Commission shall, at least annually, review each State’s implementation and enforcement of coastal fishery management plans for the purpose of determining whether such State is effectively implementing and enforcing each such plan. Upon completion of such reviews, the Commission shall report the results of the reviews to the Secretaries.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Rhode Island Fishermen's Alliance, Inc. v. Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Rhode Island Fishermen's Alliance, Inc. v. Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (2009)
“See 16 U.S.C. § 5104 (b)(1). It also designated the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (the Commission) as the body that would prepare and adopt interstate fishery management plans.”
Campanale & Sons, Inc. v. Evans (2002)
“Under the Atlantic Coastal Act, the Atlantic States Commission is responsible for *112 preparing and adopting a coastal fishery management plan (“CMP”), 16 U.S.C. § 5104 (a)(1), the equivalent of the Magnu-son-Stevens Act’s FMP, for coastal fishery resources, which are defined…”
Connecticut v. Daley (1999)
“16 U.S.C. § 5104 (a)(1). When addressing a fishery which extends among the coastal waters of several states and the federal exclusive economic zone, the Commission is to consult with the appropriate Councils to develop coastal management plans that complement any FMP the…”
New York v. Gutierrez (2009)
“4 The Fisheries Act imposes federal obligations on ASMFC, including the obligation to base FMPs on “the best scientific information available,” 16 U.S.C. § 5104 (2)(A), as well as to provide “adequate opportunity for public participation” in the FMP preparation process.”
New York v. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (2010)
“The Commission is obligated to review member states’ “implementation and enforcement of coastal fishery management plans” and “report the results of the reviews” to the Secretary of Commerce.”
Medeiros v. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (2004)
“16 U.S.C. § 5104 (a)(1). Each compact-member state identified in a management plan is required to implement and enforce the plan’s measures.”
United Boatmen v. Gutierrez (2006)
“16 U.S.C. § 5104 (a). “Atlantic Commission” — See ASMFC.”
North Carolina Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. Brown (1996)
“16 U.S.C. § 5104 . In preparing such a plan for a fishery located both in state and federal waters, the Atlantic Commission is required to consult with the appropriate regional fishery councils established under the Magnuson Act.”
Unkechauge Indian Nation v. Seggos (2023)
“See 16 U.S.C. § 5104 (b) (setting forth state implementation and enforcement obligations) (“Each State identified under [ 16 U.”
State of New York v. Ross (2022)
“” 16 U.S.C. § 5104 (a)(1). B. The Summer Flounder FMP And 1993 Allocation Rule The initial summer flounder management plan was prepared by the Atlantic States Commission in 1982.”
Cape Cod Charter Boat Association v. Burgum (2025)
“, 16 U.S.C. § 5104 (b)(1). And nothing prohibits a State from enforcing stricter regulations than those required by a plan.”
United Boatmen of New York, Inc. v. (2010)
“Pursuant to the 11 ACFCMA, a plan must “specify the requirements necessary for 12 [s]tates to be in compliance,” and the ASMFC must “identify 13 each [s]tate that is required to implement and enforce that 14 plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.