U.S. Code » Title 16 » Chapter CHAPTER 2— NATIONAL FORESTS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

16 U.S.C. § 511

Reinstatement of entries canceled or relinquished

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

All homestead entries which have been canceled or relinquished, or are invalid solely because of the erroneous allowance of such entries after the withdrawal of lands for national-forest purposes, may be reinstated or allowed to remain intact, but in the case of entries canceled prior to March 3, 1911, applications for reinstatement must have been filed in the proper local land office prior to July 1, 1912.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2023 · leading case: Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020). · cites it 2× “§525 ; 16 U. S. C. §511 . Or it could have written “primarily because of ” to indicate that the prohibited factor had to be the main cause of the defendant’s challenged em- ployment decision.”
State of New York v. United States Dep't of Labor (S.D.N.Y. 2020). “§ 525 ; 16 U.S.C. § 511 . Or it could have written “primarily because of” .”
Jose L. Garcia- Morales (Bankr.D. Colo. 2023). “§ 525 ; 16 U.S.C. § 511 . Or it could have written “primarily because of ” to indicate that the prohibited factor had to be the main cause of the defendant’s challenged employment decision.”
Jose L. Garcia- Morales (Bankr.D. Colo. 2023). “§ 525 ; 16 U.S.C. § 511 . Or it could have written “primarily because of ” to indicate that the prohibited factor had to be the main cause of the defendant’s challenged employment decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.