Notes of Decisions
Friends v. Columbia River (s055915), 212 P.3d 1243 (Or. 2009).
“The Act established a framework within which the management plan was to be developed, implemented, and administered, and divided the scenic area into three kinds of subareas: urban areas, which are not subject to scenic area regulations or the management plan, 16 U.S.C. §…”
Murray v. State of Oregon, 124 P.3d 1261 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
“16 USC § 544d(c), (d); 16 USC § 544b. 1 The Act provides that both the commission’s interim guidelines and its management plan protect and preserve agricultural land for agricultural uses.”
Tucker v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 867 P.2d 686 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994).
“16 U.S.C. § 544b. Under the Act, the interim management guidelines required the Commission to "review all proposals for major development actions and new residential development in such county in the scenic area, except urban areas.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 212 P.3d 1243 (Or. 2009).
“The Act established a framework within which the management plan was to be developed, implemented, and administered, and divided the scenic area into three kinds of subareas: urban areas, which are not subject to scenic area regulations or the management plan, 16 USC § 544b(e);…”
Judith Zimmerly, V. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2023).
“History and Duties of the Commission In 1986, Congress designated the Columbia River Gorge a national scenic area under the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 544b(a)(1). The federal Act split the scenic area into urban areas, general management areas,…”
BNSF Ry. Co. v. Clark Cnty. (W.D. Wash. 2020).
“150 18 (“Gorge Compact”), covering an area in the vicinity of the Columbia River known as the 19 “Scenic Area,” see 16 U.S.C. § 544b(a). As required by the Constitution’s Compact 20 Clause, U.”
Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 273 P.3d 267 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
“The Act designated certain land along the Columbia River as the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area (the scenic area), 16 USC § 544b, and authorized Oregon and Washington to enter into an interstate compact to form a regional agency — the commission —which, in tandem with…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 544b(a) — 1 case
BNSF Ry. Co. v. Clark Cnty. (W.D. Wash. 2020).
“150 18 (“Gorge Compact”), covering an area in the vicinity of the Columbia River known as the 19 “Scenic Area,” see 16 U.S.C. § 544b(a). As required by the Constitution’s Compact 20 Clause, U.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 544b(a)(1) — 1 case
Judith Zimmerly, V. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2023).
“History and Duties of the Commission In 1986, Congress designated the Columbia River Gorge a national scenic area under the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 544b(a)(1). The federal Act split the scenic area into urban areas, general management areas,…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 544b(a)(2)(A) — 2 cases
— 16 U.S.C. § 544b(b) — 1 case
— 16 U.S.C. § 544b(e) — 5 cases
Friends v. Columbia River (s055915), 212 P.3d 1243 (Or. 2009).
“The Act established a framework within which the management plan was to be developed, implemented, and administered, and divided the scenic area into three kinds of subareas: urban areas, which are not subject to scenic area regulations or the management plan, 16 U.S.C. §…”
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 212 P.3d 1243 (Or. 2009).
“The Act established a framework within which the management plan was to be developed, implemented, and administered, and divided the scenic area into three kinds of subareas: urban areas, which are not subject to scenic area regulations or the management plan, 16 USC § 544b(e);…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 544b(e)(1) — 1 case
— 16 U.S.C. § 544b(f)(2) — 2 cases
— 16 U.S.C. § 544b(f)(2)(A) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.