Notes of Decisions
Edwin I. Hatch v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 654 F.2d 825 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
· cites it 3× “1 Petitioner contends that the Commission acted arbitrarily and in violation of its statutory mandate under section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act (“the Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 825d(b), 2 by refusing to allow him to hold simultaneously the positions of director of a public utility…”
Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Barclays Bank PLC, 105 F. Supp. 3d 1121 (E.D. Cal. 2015).
· cites it 2× “22 Defendants also point *1146 out that 16 U.S.C. § 825d uses language other than “entity” to refer to conduct explicitly prohibited by persons.”
Nat'l Mar. Union of Am. v. Herzog, 78 F. Supp. 146 (D.D.C. 1948).
· cites it 2× “§ 19 ; against interlocking directorates between utilities and underwriters, 16 U.S.C.A. § 825d and between banks and underwriters, 12 U.”
Hendricks v. Dynegy Power Mktg., Inc., 160 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (S.D. Cal. 2001).
“See 16 U.S.C. § 825d. 7 . The fact that some Plaintiffs might have used the phrase "just and reasonable” or “unjust and unreasonable” in their complaint does not change the Court’s analysis because there is no indication that Plaintiffs intended to use these claims as they are…”
Glassberg v. Boyd, 116 A.2d 711 (Del. Ch. 1955).
“NOTES [1] The complaint charges that the other individual defendants are in one way or another beholden to the defendants, Kayser, Liddell and Vanston and accordingly are incapable of exercising individual unbiased judgment as corporate directors.”
Mississippi Valley Generating Co. v. United States, 175 F. Supp. 505 (Ct. Cl. 1959).
· cites it 2× “In March 1955 certain officers and directors of Middle South and Southern, including Yates and Barry of Southern, and Dixon, Canaday, and Sanders of Middle South, filed an application to hold interlocking positions on plaintiff's board pursuant to the provisions of Section…”
Michelsen v. Penney, 41 F. Supp. 603 (S.D.N.Y. 1941).
“856 , Title 16 U.S.C.A. § 825d; Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, Title I, Section 17(c), 49 Stat.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 825d(a) — 1 case
— 16 U.S.C. § 825d(b) — 2 cases
Edwin I. Hatch v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 654 F.2d 825 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
“1 Petitioner contends that the Commission acted arbitrarily and in violation of its statutory mandate under section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act (“the Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 825d(b), 2 by refusing to allow him to hold simultaneously the positions of director of a public utility…”
Mississippi Valley Generating Co. v. United States, 175 F. Supp. 505 (Ct. Cl. 1959).
“In March 1955 certain officers and directors of Middle South and Southern, including Yates and Barry of Southern, and Dixon, Canaday, and Sanders of Middle South, filed an application to hold interlocking positions on plaintiff's board pursuant to the provisions of Section…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 825d(e) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.