16 U.S.C. § 832e

Rate schedules

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

Schedules of rates and charges for electric energy produced at the Bonneville project and sold to purchasers as in this chapter provided shall be prepared by the administrator and become effective upon confirmation and approval thereof by the Secretary of Energy; and such rates and charges shall also be applicable to dispositions of electric energy to Federal agencies. Subject to confirmation and approval by the Secretary of Energy, such rate schedules may be modified from time to time by the administrator, and shall be fixed and established with a view to encouraging the widest possible diversified use of electric energy. The said rate schedules may provide for uniform rates or rates uniform throughout prescribed transmission areas in order to extend the benefits of an integrated transmission system and encourage the equitable distribution of the electric energy developed at the Bonneville project.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1980–1994 · leading case: United States v. Tex-La Elec. Coop., Inc., United States of Am. v. Ne. Texas Elec. Coop., Inc., 693 F.2d 392 (5th Cir. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Tex-La Elec. Coop., Inc., United States of Am. v. Ne. Texas Elec. Coop., Inc., 693 F.2d 392 (5th Cir. 1982). · cites it 3× “The Flood Control Act of 1944, the 1937 Bonneville Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 832e (1976 & Supp. IV 1980), and the 1974 Federal Columbia River Transmission System Act, 16 U.”

Pac. Power & Light Co. v. Duncan, 499 F. Supp. 672 (D. Or. 1980). · cites it 3× “The Secretary of Energy also inherited marketing power from the FPC under 16 U.S.C. §§ 832e and 838g. Section 838g provides in pertinent part: *682 Such rate schedules may be modified from time to time by the Secretary of the Interior, acting by and through the Administrator,…”

Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. United States, 23 Cl. Ct. 46 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “Today, BPA markets power from some 30 federal hydroelectric projects. BPA also markets electric power generated at two nuclear plants in the Pacific Northwest—100 percent of the power from the Washington Public Power Supply System Plant No.”

Cent. Lincoln Peoples' Util. Dist. v. Johnson, 735 F.2d 1101 (9th Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “” 16 U.S.C. § 832e. The FPC interpreted these provisions as creating a dual statutory standard of providing customers with the benefits of power at the lowest possible price consistent with good business practices as well as protecting the interest of the United States in…”

Vill. of Bergen v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 33 F.3d 1385 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “16 U.S.C. § 832e(a), (b) (1988). The Bonneville Power Administration is a federal instrumentality, see id.”

— 16 U.S.C. § 832e(a) — 1 case

Vill. of Bergen v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 33 F.3d 1385 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “16 U.S.C. § 832e(a), (b) (1988). The Bonneville Power Administration is a federal instrumentality, see id.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.