16 U.S.C. § 837e

Transmission lines for other electric energy; rates

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

Any capacity in Federal transmission lines connecting, either by themselves or with non-Federal lines, a generating plant in the Pacific Northwest or Canada with the other area or with any other area outside the Pacific Northwest, which is not required for the transmission of Federal energy or the energy described in section 837h of this title, shall be made available as a carrier for transmission of other electric energy between such areas. The transmission of other electric energy shall be at equitable rates determined by the Secretary, but such rates shall be subject to equitable adjustment at appropriate intervals not less frequently than once in every five years as agreed to by the parties. No contract for the transmission of non-Federal energy on a firm basis shall be affected by any increase, subsequent to the execution of such contract, in the requirements for transmission of Federal energy, the energy described in section 837h of this title, or other electric energy.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1985–1997 · leading case: Dep't of Water & Power of the City of Los Angeles v. Bonneville Power Admin., 759 F.2d 684 (9th Cir. 1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dep't of Water & Power of the City of Los Angeles v. Bonneville Power Admin., 759 F.2d 684 (9th Cir. 1985). · cites it 6× “16 U.S.C. § 837e. Any capacity in the Intertie “which is not required for the transmission of Federal energy .”

California Energy Resources Conservation & Dev. Comm'n v. Bonneville Power Admin., 831 F.2d 1467 (9th Cir. 1987). · cites it 7× “16 U.S.C. § 837e. Any capacity in the Intertie “which is not required for the transmission of Federal energy .”

Ass'n of Pub. Agency Customers, Inc. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 126 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 1997). “16 U.S.C. § 837e. The Preference Act did not forbid allocating transmission capacity to the DSIs, even though the Project Act discussed the DSIs at length.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.