16 U.S.C. § 838f
Marketing of Federal power; sales agent
The Administrator is hereby designated as the marketing agent for all electric power generated by Federal generating plants in the Pacific Northwest, constructed by, under construction by, or presently authorized for construction by the Bureau of Reclamation or the United States Corps of Engineers except electric power required for the operation of each Federal project and except electric power from the Green Springs project of the Bureau of Reclamation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1997–2014 · leading case: Indus. Customers of Nw. Utils. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 767 F.3d 912 (9th Cir. 2014).
Indus. Customers of Nw. Utils. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 767 F.3d 912 (9th Cir. 2014). “1997); see 16 U.S.C. § 838f. In numerous prior opinions, we have provided extensive background on BPA’s history and operations.”
S. California Edison v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 66 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “There was no administrative record associated with that incorporation, and therefore there was no trigger for exclusive Ninth Circuit jurisdiction under 16 U.S.C. § 838f (e)(5) (the catch-all provision for “final actions” taken on an administrative record), discussed supra, at…”
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation v. Bonneville Power Admin., 342 F.3d 924 (9th Cir. 2003). “16 U.S.C. § 838f. The BPA administrator must exercise his hydroelectric power responsibilities “in a manner that provides equitable treatment” for fish and wildlife.”
Ass'n of Pub. Agency Customers, Inc. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 126 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 1997). “16 U.S.C. § 838f. As part of its marketing responsibilities, BPA is charged with oversight of the massive federal high-voltage transmission system, comprising approximately 80% of the bulk transmission capacity in the Pacific Northwest, used to deliver power generated at a…”
Minidoka Irrigation Dist. v. Dep't of the Interior, 154 F.3d 924 (9th Cir. 1998). “16 U.S.C. § 838f. It directed the BPA in how to set rates.”
Bell v. Bonneville Power Admin., 340 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2003). “16 U.S.C. § 838f. In furtherance of this mandate, BPA entered numerous contracts to supply power at a designated rate to direct service industries (DSIs), industrial companies engaged in power intensive operations.”
Icnu v. Bpa (9th Cir. 2014). “1997); see 16 U.S.C. § 838f. In numerous prior opinions, we have provided extensive background on BPA’s history and operations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.