Whoever, being an officer, agent or employee of or connected in any capacity with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, any Federal home loan bank, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Farm Credit Administration, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, the Secretary of Agriculture acting through the Farmers Home Administration or successor agency, the Rural Development Administration or successor agency, or the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, a Farm Credit Bank, a bank for cooperatives or any lending, mortgage, insurance, credit or savings and loan corporation or association authorized or acting under the laws of the United States or any institution, other than an insured bank (as defined in section 656), the accounts of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or by the National Credit Union Administration Board or any small business investment company, with intent to defraud any such institution or any other company, body politic or corporate, or any individual, or to deceive any officer, auditor, examiner or agent of any such institution or of department or agency of the United States, makes any false entry in any book, report or statement of or to any such institution, or without being duly authorized, draws any order or bill of exchange, makes any acceptance, or issues, puts forth or assigns any note, debenture, bond or other obligation, or draft, bill of exchange, mortgage, judgment, or decree, or, with intent to defraud the United States or any agency thereof, or any corporation, institution, or association referred to in this section, participates or shares in or receives directly or indirectly any money, profit, property, or benefits through any transaction, loan, commission, contract, or any other act of any such corporation, institution, or association, shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Weldon Rushing Payne, Lloyd Earl Taylor, 750 F.2d 844 (11th Cir. 1985).
· cites it 32× “§ 657 1 ), four counts of unlawful participation in the proceeds of Federal Land Bank loans, or aiding and abetting the same ( 18 U.S.C. §§ 1006 2 and 2 3 ), and one count of conspiracy to violate various false statement, misapplication, and unlawful participation statutes ( 18…”
United States v. Don Stovall & Robert Harlon \Frosty\" Winter", 825 F.2d 817 (5th Cir. 1987).
· cites it 12× “Winter was charged with and convicted of three offenses arising out of the Abies transaction: (1) recording a false statement when he made the loan, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1006 (count one); misapplying funds by loaning money to Abies for non-agricultural purposes, a…”
United States v. Debbe Marquardt, 786 F.2d 771 (7th Cir. 1986).
· cites it 9× “§ 657 1 and of knowingly and willfully making false entries into a book, report or statement of a federally insured savings and loan institution with intent to defraud the institution and deceive its officers, examiners and auditors in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1006 . 2 *774…”
United States v. Louis Rochester, 898 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1990).
· cites it 6× “§ 657 ), Count 18 (false entry in a loan record in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1006 ) and Count 19 (fraudulent participation in a loan transaction in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Colon-Munoz, 192 F.3d 210 (1st Cir. 1999).
· cites it 6× “§ 1344 , one count of false entry under 18 U.S.C. § 1006 , one count of benefitting, directly or indirectly, from the loan transactions in question under 18 U.”
United States v. Carl Clayton Chenaur, 552 F.2d 294 (9th Cir. 1977).
· cites it 10× “Carl Clayton Chenaur appeals his conviction by a jury on all counts of a 22 count superseding indictment relating to (a) aiding and abetting officers of an institution having federally insured accounts who had intent to defraud their own institution, the United States, or the…”
United States v. Robert S. Luce, 873 F.3d 999 (7th Cir. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Luce was subject to civil penalties under the FIRREA because he had “unlawfully, willfully and knowingly made, used, or caused to be made or used, false and fraudulent records, statements, or certifications to HUD” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1006 , one of the predicate offenses…”
United States v. Reagan, 596 F.3d 251 (5th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 2× “2d at 1111 , for example, the defendant was convicted of two counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1006 after issuing two improper loans in the course of a single real estate transac *254 tion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.