Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or report, or willfully overvalues any land, property or security, for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of the Federal Housing Administration, the Farm Credit Administration, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation or a company the Corporation reinsures, the Secretary of Agriculture acting through the Farmers Home Administration or successor agency, the Rural Development Administration or successor agency, any Farm Credit Bank, production credit association, agricultural credit association, bank for cooperatives, or any division, officer, or employee thereof, or of any regional agricultural credit corporation established pursuant to law, or a Federal land bank, a Federal land bank association, a Federal Reserve bank, a small business investment company, as defined in section 103 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 662), or the Small Business Administration in connection with any provision of that Act, a Federal credit union, an insured State-chartered credit union, any institution the accounts of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,,11 So in original. any Federal home loan bank, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, or the National Credit Union Administration Board, a branch or agency of a foreign bank (as such terms are defined in paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 1(b) of the International Banking Act of 1978), an organization operating under section 25 or section 25(a) 22 See References in Text note below. of the Federal Reserve Act, or a mortgage lending business, or any person or entity that makes in whole or in part a federally related mortgage loan as defined in section 3 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974, upon any application, advance, discount, purchase, purchase agreement, repurchase agreement, commitment, loan, or insurance agreement or application for insurance or a guarantee, or any change or extension of any of the same, by renewal, deferment of action or otherwise, or the acceptance, release, or substitution of security therefor, shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both. The term “State-chartered credit union” includes a credit union chartered under the laws of a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Williams v. United States, 458 U.S. 279 (1982).
· cites it 18× “In this case we must decide whether the deposit of a "bad check" in a federally insured bank is proscribed by 18 U. S. C. § 1014 . I In 1975, petitioner William Archie Williams purchased a controlling interest in the Pelican State Bank in Pelican, La.”
United States v. Allan Boren, 278 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2002).
· cites it 20× “The government appeals the district court’s dismissal of two counts of an indictment alleging that Defendant Allan Boren made false statements to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 . The statements were allegedly made in connection with a request to stop…”
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
· cites it 12× “The principal issue before us is whether materiality of falsehood is an element of the crime of knowingly making a false statement to a federally insured bank, 18 U. S. C. § 1014 . We hold that it is not.”
United States v. Charles Lakeetoe Wade, 266 F.3d 574 (6th Cir. 2001).
· cites it 17× “Wade appeals his conviction for making false statements for the purpose of influencing a FDIC insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , possession of counterfeit securities in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Matthew G. Munksgard, 913 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 14× “18 U.S.C. § 1014 . Matthew Munksgard admits to knowingly making false statements in order to obtain bank loans—indeed, four times over.”
United States v. Hill, 643 F.3d 807 (11th Cir. 2011).
· cites it 5× “§ 1344 ; with four instances of making false statements to influence the credit decision of a financial institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 ; and with six instances of money laundering in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr., 694 F.2d 1270 (D.C. Cir. 1982).
· cites it 8× “Mangieri appeals his conviction by a jury on nine counts of making false statements on applications for loans from a federal credit union, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 . Appellant attacks his conviction on six grounds: (1) selective prosecution; (2) illegal amendment of the…”
United States v. Vincent Lane, 323 F.3d 568 (7th Cir. 2003).
· cites it 7× “§ 1344 and eight counts of making false statements to a bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 . The district court dismissed the charge of bank fraud on the government’s motion and subsequently a jury found Lane guilty on five counts of making false statements to a bank.”
United States v. Michael A. Crisp, 454 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2006).
· cites it 4× “For his role in the scheme to defraud the bank, Crisp was charged with one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1014 . He pleaded guilty to it.”
Rubin v. United States, 449 U.S. 424 (1981).
· cites it 4× “[4] Count 1 of the indictment charged petitioner and his codefendants with conspiring to violate 18 U. S. C. § 1014 (fraud in a bank loan application), 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.