18 U.S.C. § 1382
Entering military, naval, or Coast Guard property
Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval, or Coast Guard reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station, or installation, for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation; or
Whoever reenters or is found within any such reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station, or installation, after having been removed therefrom or ordered not to reenter by any officer or person in command or charge thereof—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 169
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1960–2026 · leading case: United States v. Albertini, 472 U.S. 675 (1985).
United States v. Albertini, 472 U.S. 675 (1985). “The question presented is whether respondent may be convicted for violating 18 U. S. C. § 1382 , which makes it unlawful to reenter a military base after having been barred by the commanding officer.”
United States v. Apel, 134 S. Ct. 1144 (2014). “A Magistrate Judge convicted him of violating 18 U. S. C. §1382 , which makes it a crime to reenter a “military.”
United States v. Ayala Ayala, 289 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2002). “, Dennis Hickey Rivera, and Armando Torres Ortiz were convicted of entering onto the Camp Garcia Naval Installation on the island of Vieques, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382 . Unpersuaded by their arguments on appeal, we affirm their convictions.”
Greer v. Spock, 424 U.S. 828 (1976). “" [4] Title 18 U. S. C. § 1382 , provides that "[w]hoever reenters or is found within [a military] reservation .”
United States v. James W. Douglass, 579 F.2d 545 (9th Cir. 1978). “The appellant was convicted of violating the second paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 1382 1 because of certain conduct by him on July 21,1977.”
United States v. Maxwell-Anthony, 254 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2001). “Following a bench trial, the district court found Maxwell guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1382 and sentenced him to thirty days in prison for this Class B misdemeanor.”
Flower v. United States, 407 U.S. 197 (1972). “In an ensuing prosecution before the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas on charges of violating 18 U. S. C. § 1382 ("Whoever reenters or is found [within a military post] after having been removed therefrom or ordered not to reenter by any officer or…”
United States v. Joan McCoy, 866 F.2d 826 (6th Cir. 1989). “With two co-defendants, appellant Joan McCoy was tried and convicted on three counts of reentering a military installation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382 , after having been ordered by the commanding officer not to reenter.”
United States v. Nigel D. Cottier, 759 F.2d 760 (9th Cir. 1985). “BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Cottier appeals his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1382 , unlawful entry into a military installation.”
United States v. Bichsel, 156 F.3d 1148 (11th Cir. 1998). “PER CURIAM: Twenty-two defendants appeal their convictions and sentences for reentering a military installation after the installation’s commander had ordered them not to reenter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382 . We affirm. Background Fort Benning, Georgia, is home to the…”
United States v. Norma Burgos-Andjar, 275 F.3d 23 (1st Cir. 2001). “On July 6, 2001, after a bench trial, appellant was convicted of criminal trespass in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382 . After finding the appellant guilty, the district court gave appellant and her co-defendants an opportunity to address the court.”
United States v. Clare Therese Grady, 18 F.4th 1275 (11th Cir. 2021). “7 Section 1361 provides: Whoever willfully injures or commits any depredation against any property of the United States, or of any department or agency thereof, or any property USCA11 Case: 20-14341 Date Filed: 11/22/2021 Page: 10 of 39 10 Opinion of the Court 20-14341 violation…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.