18 U.S.C. § 19
Petty offense defined
As used in this title, the term “petty offense” means a Class B misdemeanor, a Class C misdemeanor, or an infraction, for which the maximum fine is no greater than the amount set forth for such an offense in section 3571(b)(6) or (7) in the case of an individual or section 3571(c)(6) or (7) in the case of an organization.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 89
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: United States v. James D. Soderna, 82 F.3d 1370 (7th Cir. 1996).
United States v. James D. Soderna, 82 F.3d 1370 (7th Cir. 1996). “18 U.S.C. § 19 ; see id., § 3571(b)(6). The Supreme Court held in Muniz v.”
United States v. James Little, 78 F.4th 453 (D.C. Cir. 2023). “” 18 U.S.C. § 19 (defining “petty offense” to include Class B misdemeanors).”
People v. Davis, 912 N.E.2d 1044 (NY 2009). “to be tried before a district judge for the district in which the offense was committed” (emphasis added)]; 18 USC §§ 19 , 3559 [a] [7]; see also United States v Rivera-Negron, 201 FRD 285, 288-289 [D PR 2001], citing United States v McCrickard, 957 F Supp 1149 [ED Cal 1996]…”
United States v. Dan Wallen, 874 F.3d 620 (9th Cir. 2017). “onviction under § 1540 2 is an “additional statutory penalt[y] so severe as to indicate that the legislature considered the offensé serious”; (B) the $15,000 in restitution he was ordered to pay likewise amounts to a sufficiently “severe” “additional statutory pen-ally]”; and…”
United States v. Van Alstyne, 584 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2009). “18 U.S.C. § 19 . 1. We begin by closely examining the Santos decision, as it is both the substantive and procedural predicate for Van Alstyne’s challenge to the money laundering conviction.”
United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. & Leila J. Goldstein, 882 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1989). “§ 1 (3) (1930) (amended 1985, repealed 1987, current version at 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 19 , 3571(b)(6HU (c)(6H7) (West Supp.”
United States v. Kenneth A. Kozel, 908 F.2d 205 (7th Cir. 1990). “The government, hoping that it could avoid a jury trial by tracking the definition of “petty offense’’ contained in 18 U.S.C. §§ 19 , 3559(a)(7) and 3571(b)(6, 7) (1988)— and apparently without considering the arguable relevance of Codispoti v.”
United States v. Chavez, 204 F.3d 1305 (11th Cir. 2000). “” See 18 U.S.C. § 19 . Only one other circuit has published opinions regarding whether 18 U.”
United States v. Rebecca Moriello, 980 F.3d 924 (4th Cir. 2020). “See 18 U.S.C. §§ 19 , 3571(b)(6), 3559(a)(8); 41 C.”
United States v. Zenon, 285 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D.P.R. 2003). “Petty offenses are defined in 18 U.S.C. § 19 : As used in this title, the term “petty offense” means a Class B misdemeanor, a Class C misdemeanor, or an infraction, for which the maximum fine is no greater than the amount set forth for such an offense in section 3571(b)(6) or…”
Eslamizar, 23 I. & N. Dec. 684 (BIA 2004). “As such, if it were to be regarded as a crime, it would fall, for constitutional purposes, into the category of a “petty offense,” a species of misdemeanor that is punishable by a maximum of 6 months’ imprisonment and a fine of uncertain dimension, but probably not extending…”
United States v. Brock, 863 F. Supp. 851 (E.D. Wis. 1994). “In support of that argument, they point to 18 U.S.C. § 19 , which defines “petty” offenses as those misdemeanors for which the maximum sentence is no greater than six months and the maximum fine is no greater than $5,000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.