18 U.S.C. § 203
INTERPRETATION OF EXTRADITION TREATIES.
“For purposes of any extradition treaty to which the United States is a party, Congress authorizes the interpretation of the terms ‘kidnaping’ and ‘kidnapping’ to include parental kidnapping.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 120
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1936–2026 · leading case: Crandon v. United States, 494 U.S. 152 (1990).
Crandon v. United States, 494 U.S. 152 (1990). “Another of the ethics statutes, 18 U. S. C. § 203 , does read that way, covering the receipt or payment of "any compensation" for services as a Government employee relating to a particular matter.”
United States v. E.W. Freeman, 813 F.2d 303 (10th Cir. 1987). “§ 371 , and two counts of offering an illegal gratuity to a federal employee in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 203 (b). A guilty verdict was returned by a jury on all three counts.”
United States v. Eugene Robert Wallach, 979 F.2d 912 (2d Cir. 1992). “§ 2314 (1988), and conspiracy to violate the federal conflict of interest statute, 18 U.S.C. § 203 (1988), and to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, & Charles Edward Gent, Jr., 572 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978). “*480 As a prefatory premise, we note that both the conflict of interest statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 203 , and the unlawful gratuity statute, 18 U.”
United States v. Proj. on Gov't Oversight, 616 F.3d 544 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “Nor did this court refuse to read a scienter requirement into 18 U.S.C. § 203 (a) in United States v. Baird, 29 F.”
United States v. Alexander A. Alexandro, Jr., 675 F.2d 34 (2d Cir. 1982). “§ 371 , 6 and conflict of interest pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 203 7 must be overturned. He further *36 asserts that his conviction of conflict of interest should be vacated as a lesser included offense of his conviction of bribe receiving.”
United States v. Bertram L. Podell, 572 F.2d 31 (2d Cir. 1978). “Count One, Paragraphs 5(b) and (c) set forth the means by which Podell acknowledged he had carried out this unlawful purpose, stating specifically that he had met with Bahamian officials, as well as the CAB and the FAA, on behalf of Florida Atlantic Airlines, and that he had…”
Marasco & Nesselbush, LLP v. Collins, 6 F.4th 150 (1st Cir. 2021). “18 U.S.C. § 203 (a); see also id. § 205(a) (subjecting federal employees to penalties for undertaking such representation).”
United States v. David P. Baird, United States of Am. v. David P. Baird, United States of Am. v. David P. Baird, 29 F.3d 647 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “Baird of violating one of the federal conflict of interest statutes, 18 U.S.C. § 203 . Baird challenges the judgment of conviction, questioning whether the statute covered someone like himself working on relatively short-term assignments in the Coast Guard, arguing that the…”
May v. United States, 175 F.2d 994 (D.C. Cir. 1949). “The offense against the United States, violation of 18 U.S.C. § 203 (1946), which the defendants are in Count I charged with having conspired to commit is one requiring, from its very nature, concert of action and agreement between the parties involved.”
Georgia Dep't of Human Resources v. Sistrunk, 291 S.E.2d 524 (Ga. 1982). “[6] 18 USCA § 203. This right of congressmen is not shared by other federal public officials.”
Ekberg v. United States, 167 F.2d 380 (1st Cir. 1948). “Thus under a statute, *385 18 U.S.C.A. § 203 , making it an offense for an officer or employee of the United States Government to "receive, or agree to receive, any compensation" for services to any person with relation to a claim or proceeding in which the United States is a…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 203(b) — 2 cases
United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, & Charles Edward Gent, Jr., 572 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978). “*480 As a prefatory premise, we note that both the conflict of interest statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 203 , and the unlawful gratuity statute, 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.