18 U.S.C. § 2246
Definitions for chapter
Pub. L. 99–646 and Pub. L. 99–654 added identical sections.
2022—Par. (7). Pub. L. 117–103 added par. (7).
1998—Par. (6). Pub. L. 105–314 added par. (6).
1994—Pub. L. 103–322, § 60010(a)(1), renumbered section 2245 of this title as this section.
Par. (2)(D). Pub. L. 103–322, § 40502, added subpar. (D).
Amendment by Pub. L. 117–103 not effective until Oct. 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 448
cases (112 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: United States v. Shafer, 573 F.3d 267 (6th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Shafer, 573 F.3d 267 (6th Cir. 2009). “First, the district judge found that, although "sexual act," as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (2), requires one individual to make contact with another individual, the plain language of 18 U.”
United States v. Scott Hayward, 359 F.3d 631 (3rd Cir. 2004). “] 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (2). Section 2A3.4 applies when a defendant engages in or attempts to engage in abu *640 sive sexual contact.”
United States v. Patrick Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868 (6th Cir. 2019). “" 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (3) Even without the DNA evidence or H.”
United States v. Shafer, 557 F.3d 440 (6th Cir. 2009). “First, the district judge found that, although "sexual act," as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (2), requires one individual to make contact with another individual, the plain language of 18 U.”
United States v. Ronald Gene Kenyon, Also Known as Ronald G. Bingen, 397 F.3d 1071 (8th Cir. 2005). “” This evidence is sufficient to establish the sexual act of touching another’s genitalia in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (2)(D). See Lee, 232 F.3d at 655 (holding testimony that defendant touched child “between [her] legs” both outside and inside her clothing was sufficient to…”
United States v. Castillo, 140 F.3d 874 (10th Cir. 1998). “§§ 2242 , 2243. Section 2244, on the other hand, which prohibits sexual contact, requires “an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of another person.”
United States v. Edward Raiburn, 20 F.4th 416 (8th Cir. 2021). “’s move to Des Moines in July 2019 cannot be said to have been preparation for the offense of production of selfie-styled nude images of K.N. weeks later in August 2019.”
United States v. Levian Pacheco Pacheco, 977 F.3d 764 (9th Cir. 2020). “” 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (5)(A). The panel held that, under § 2246(5)(A), the phrase “pending … deportation” does not require a finding of actual or inevitable removal from the United States.”
United States v. Shawn Shaw, 891 F.3d 441 (3rd Cir. 2018). “" 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (2)(A), (C). A " 'sexual act' .”
United States v. Norman T., 129 F.3d 1099 (10th Cir. 1997). “raises several issues: he challenges the district court’s reading of 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (2)(C); he contests the sufficiency of the evidence on the elements of penetration and intent; he argues the district court erred in allowing the victim to testify; and he contends the district…”
United States v. Jeffrey Stock, 685 F.3d 621 (6th Cir. 2012). “18 U.S.C. § 2246 (2). Stock’s 1998 Indiana sexual-battery offenses were not—at least as far as we can tell from the record—“comparable or more severe than” the two federal sexual-abuse offenses listed in 42 U.”
United States v. Francis Crowley, 318 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 2003). “Section 2241(a)(1), the most relevant for purposes of this opinion, prohibits causing or attempting to cause another person to commit a sexual act (specifically defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (2) as including, as to adults, essentially only genital, oral, anal or digital…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2246(2) — 1 case
United States v. Starr, 486 F. Supp. 2d 940 (N.D. Iowa 2007).
— 18 U.S.C. § 2246(2)(D) — 1 case
United States v. Downer (4th Cir. 1998).
— 18 U.S.C. § 2246(3) — 3 cases
STATE of Louisiana v. Gary LAYTON; State of Louisiana v. Gary Layton, 168 So. 3d 358 (La. 2015).
United States v. Colfax (9th Cir. 2026).
Elliott v. United States (D.N.M. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.