18 U.S.C. § 2342
Unlawful acts
2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–177, § 121(b)(2), inserted “or contraband smokeless tobacco” after “contraband cigarettes”.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–177, § 121(a)(2), substituted “10,000” for “60,000”.
Subsec. (a) of this section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 102
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: United States v. Antonio Farias, 836 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Antonio Farias, 836 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2016). “§ 2314 , and to traffic in contraband cigarettes, 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (a). The district court sentenced Farias to 36 months in prison and ordered him to forfeit his proceeds from the offense, which the parties agreed were $331,426.”
United States v. Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 2004). “2004); transportation of contraband cigarettes, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 2342 (West 2000); and providing material support to a designated FTO, see 18 U.”
United States v. Wilbur, 674 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2012). “" 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (a). The CCTA defines contraband cigarettes as: a quantity in excess of 10,000 cigarettes, which bear no evidence of the payment of applicable State or local cigarette taxes *1165 in the State or locality where such cigarettes are found, if the State or local…”
United States v. Morrison, 596 F. Supp. 2d 661 (E.D.N.Y 2009). “Racketeering Acts Four through Eighty Charged Morrison with Violations of the CCTA Under Both 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 ..”
United States v. Haitham Mohamed, 759 F.3d 798 (7th Cir. 2014). “On March 26, 2013, a jury convicted Haitham Mohamed of one count of knowingly transporting and possessing contraband cigarettes in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (a). Mr. Mohamed appeals his conviction, claiming that the district court erred in denying his motions for judgment of…”
New York v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 160 F. Supp. 3d 629 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “” 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (a). The CCTA defines “contraband cigarettes” as “a quantity in excess of 10,000 cigarettes, which bear no evidence of the payment of applicable State or local cigarette taxes in the State or locality where such cigarettes are found .”
United States v. Leonard Dimaria, 727 F.2d 265 (2d Cir. 1984). “§ 659 (Count III), possession of contraband cigarettes in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (Count IV) 1 and conspiracy to commit both substantive offenses in violation of 18 U.”
New York v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 942 F.3d 554 (2d Cir. 2019). “The district court held that UPS was liable under the CCTA for knowingly transporting “contraband cigarettes,” see 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (a), which are defined as “a quantity in excess of 10,000 cigarettes, which bear no evidence of the payment of applicable State or local cigarette…”
City of New York v. Milhelm Attea & Bros., Inc., 550 F. Supp. 2d 332 (E.D.N.Y 2008). “CCTA Claims The CCTA makes it “unlawful for any person knowingly to ship, transport, re *346 ceive, possess, sell, distribute, or purchase contraband cigarettes” 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (a). Contraband cigarettes are defined as “a quantity in excess of 10,000 cigarettes, which bear no…”
United States v. Fiander, 547 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2008). “The charges included violations of the Contraband Cigarette Trafficking Act (“CCTA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (a); conspiracy to violate the CCTA, 18 U.”
United States v. Elsayed Akef Elshenawy, 801 F.2d 856 (6th Cir. 1986). “Appellant, Elsayed Akef Elshenawy, was charged with “knowingly” possessing contraband cigarettes, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2342 (a). Elshenawy filed a pre-trial motion to construe the statute, and the district court ruled that the statute does not require the government to…”
New York v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 253 F. Supp. 3d 583 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). “18 U.S.C. §§ 2342 (a), 2341(2). The Court discusses the legal principles underpinning its findings of knowledge below.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2342(a) — 1 case
New York v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 131 F. Supp. 3d 132 (S.D.N.Y. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.