18 U.S.C. § 2383
Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35
cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1957–2026 · leading case: Anderson v. Griswold, 2023 CO 63 (Colo. 2023).
Anderson v. Griswold, 2023 CO 63 (Colo. 2023). “¶105 We are similarly unpersuaded by Intervenors’ assertions that Congress created the only currently available mechanism for determining whether a person is disqualified pursuant to Section Three with the 1994 passage of 18 U.S.C. § 2383 . That statute makes it a crime to…”
Licci Ex Rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL, 673 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2012). “It contains five claims against LCB: (1) primary liability for international terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2383 (a) (“the Anti-Terrorism Act”); (2) aiding-and-abetting liability for international terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act; (3) aiding-…”
Cynthia King v. United States Dep't of Just., 830 F.2d 210 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “The Staver-Scheuplein declaration avers that the file was compiled for law-enforcement purposes pursuant to predecessor versions of 18 U.S.C. § 2383 (1982) (rebellion or insurrection), id.”
Tamara Fields v. Twitter, Inc., 881 F.3d 739 (9th Cir. 2018). “(Twitter) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2383 (a), the civil remedies provision of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), alleging that they were injured “by reason of’ Twitter’s knowing provision of material support to ISIS.”
Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024). “See 18 U. S. C. § 2383 . Moreover, permitting state enforcement of Section 3 against federal offceholders and candidates would raise seri- ous questions about the scope of that power.”
Donald Williams v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation & United States Dep't of Just., 69 F.3d 1155 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “In particular, the FBI suspected Afro Set of violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 2383 (rebellion or insurrection), 2384 (seditious conspiracy), and 2385 (advocating overthrow of the government).”
Pugh v. Socialist People's Libryan Arab Jamahiriya, 530 F. Supp. 2d 216 (D.D.C. 2008). “Against the Individual Libyan Defendants, William Schutzius shall be awarded an amount that reflects the amount that is derived above trebled pursuant to the statutory mandate of 18 U.S.C. § 2383 (a). 53. Christopher M. Schutzius is entitled to damages under Texas law for…”
John Doe v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, John Doe v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 936 F.2d 1346 (D.C. Cir. 1991). “These crimes are codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2383 (1988) (rebellion or insurrection); 18 U.”
Estates of Ungar & Ungar v. Palestinian Auth., 325 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.R.I. 2004). “Specifically, the court identifies the time claimed on the following dates as attributable (or sufficiently related) to such filings or the obtaining of default so as to warrant the *69 award of attorney’s fees against the PLO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2383 (a): February 10, 11,…”
J. Gary Shaw v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 749 F.2d 58 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “The Bureau has cited several statutes whose violation could reasonably have been thought evidenced by the assassination, including those punishing rebellion or insurrection, 18 U.S.C. § 2383 (1982), seditious conspiracy, 18 U.”
Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 97 F. Supp. 3d 287 (E.D.N.Y 2015). “© LO CO INTRODUCTION This case involves claims brought under the civil liability provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act (“ATA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2383 (a) et seq., against defendant Arab Bank, PLC.”
Dunaway v. Webster, 519 F. Supp. 1059 (N.D. Cal. 1981). “See, Affidavit of Patrick H. Lang (“Lang Affidavit”), filed March 15, 1978, at 14; Rascher Affidavit, filed March 15, 1978, at 15; Affidavit of Alan P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.