18 U.S.C. § 247

Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Whoever, in any of the circumstances referred to in subsection (b) of this section—(1) intentionally defaces, damages, or destroys any religious real property, because of the religious character of that property, or attempts to do so; or(2) intentionally obstructs, by force or threat of force, including by threat of force against religious real property, any person in the enjoyment of that person’s free exercise of religious beliefs, or attempts to do so;shall be punished as provided in subsection (d).(b) The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the offense is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce.(c) Whoever intentionally defaces, damages, or destroys any religious real property because of the race, color, or ethnic characteristics of any individual associated with that religious property, or attempts to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (d).(d) The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) or (c) of this section shall be—(1) if death results from acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, a fine in accordance with this title and imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death;(2) if bodily injury results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section, and the violation is by means of fire or an explosive, a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more that 40 years, or both;(3) if bodily injury to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section, results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, a fine in accordance with this title and imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both;(4) if damage to or destruction of property results from the acts committed in violation of this section, which damage to or destruction of such property is in an amount that exceeds $5,000, a fine in accordance with this title, imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both; and(5) in any other case, a fine in accordance with this title and imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.(e) No prosecution of any offense described in this section shall be undertaken by the United States except upon the certification in writing of the Attorney General or his designee that in his judgment a prosecution by the United States is in the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice.(f) As used in this section, the term “religious real property” means any church, synagogue, mosque, religious cemetery, or other religious real property, including fixtures or religious objects contained within a place of religious worship, or real property owned or leased by a nonprofit, religiously affiliated organization.(g) No person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any noncapital offense under this section unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted not later than 7 years after the date on which the offense was committed.(Added Pub. L. 100–346, § 1, June 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 644; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(d), title XXXII, § 320103(d), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1971, 2110; Pub. L. 104–155, § 3, July 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1392; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 601(c)(3), 605(r), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3499, 3511; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(c)(1), (e)(4), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, 1810; Pub. L. 115–249, § 2, Sept. 28, 2018, 132 Stat. 3162.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2018—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 115–249, § 2(1), inserted “including by threat of force against religious real property,” after “threat of force,”.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 115–249, § 2(2)(A), inserted “or (c)” after “subsection (a)” in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (d)(4), (5). Pub. L. 115–249, § 2(2)(B)–(D), added par. (4) and redesignated former par. (4) as (5).

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 115–249, § 2(3), inserted “, or real property owned or leased by a nonprofit, religiously affiliated organization” before period at end.

2002—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 107–273, § 4002(c)(1), repealed amendment by Pub. L. 104–294, § 605(r). See 1996 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 107–273, § 4002(e)(4), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 104–294, § 601(c)(3). See 1996 Amendment note below.

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(1), substituted “subsection (d)” for “subsection (c) of this section” in concluding provisions.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(3), added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: “The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that—

“(1) in committing the offense, the defendant travels in interstate or foreign commerce, or uses a facility or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in interstate or foreign commerce; and

“(2) in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), the loss resulting from the defacement, damage, or destruction is more than $10,000.”

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(2), added subsec. (c). Former subsec. (c) redesignated (d).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–294, § 605(r), which directed the substitution of “certification” for “notification” in subsec. (d), was repealed by Pub. L. 107–273, § 4002(c)(1).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(2), redesignated subsec. (c) as (d). Former subsec. (d) redesignated (e).

Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(4)(C), added par. (2). Former par. (2) redesignated (3).

Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(4)(A), (B), redesignated par. (2) as (3), inserted “to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section,” after “bodily injury” and substituted “20 years” for “ten years”. Former par. (3) redesignated (4).

Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(4)(B), redesignated par. (3) as (4).

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 104–294, § 601(c)(3), as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, § 4002(e)(4), substituted “certification” for “notification”.

Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(2), redesignated subsec. (d) as (e). Former subsec. (e) redesignated (f).

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(2), (5), redesignated subsec. (e) as (f), inserted “, including fixtures or religious objects contained within a place of religious worship” before the period, and substituted “religious real property” for “religious property” in two places.

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 104–155, § 3(6), added subsec. (g).

1994—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 103–322, § 320103(d)(1), inserted “from acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill” after “death results”.

Pub. L. 103–322, § 60006(d), inserted “, or may be sentenced to death” after “or both”.

Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 103–322, § 320103(d)(2), struck out “serious” before “bodily” and inserted “from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire” after “injury results”.

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 103–322, § 320103(d)(3), amended subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (e) read as follows: “As used in this section—

“(1) the term ‘religious real property’ means any church, synagogue, mosque, religious cemetery, or other religious real property; and

“(2) the term ‘serious bodily injury’ means bodily injury that involves a substantial risk of death, unconsciousness, extreme physical pain, protracted and obvious disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.”

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2002 Amendment

Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, provided that the amendment made by section 4002(c)(1) is effective Oct. 11, 1996.

Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(e)(4), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1810, provided that the amendment made by section 4002(e)(4) is effective Oct. 11, 1996.

Congressional Findings

Pub. L. 104–155, § 2, July 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1392, provided that: “The Congress finds the following:“(1) The incidence of arson or other destruction or vandalism of places of religious worship, and the incidence of violent interference with an individual’s lawful exercise or attempted exercise of the right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship pose a serious national problem.“(2) The incidence of arson of places of religious worship has recently increased, especially in the context of places of religious worship that serve predominantly African-American congregations.“(3) Changes in Federal law are necessary to deal properly with this problem.“(4) Although local jurisdictions have attempted to respond to the challenges posed by such acts of destruction or damage to religious property, the problem is sufficiently serious, widespread, and interstate in scope to warrant Federal intervention to assist State and local jurisdictions.“(5) Congress has authority, pursuant to the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, to make acts of destruction or damage to religious property a violation of Federal law.“(6) Congress has authority, pursuant to section 2 of the 13th amendment to the Constitution, to make actions of private citizens motivated by race, color, or ethnicity that interfere with the ability of citizens to hold or use religious property without fear of attack, violations of Federal criminal law.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 74 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: United States v. Dylann Roof, 10 F.4th 314 (4th Cir. 2021).
United States v. Dylann Roof, 10 F.4th 314 (4th Cir. 2021). · cites it 11× “§ 249 (a)(1); Counts 13 through 21, obstructing religious exercise resulting in death, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 247 (a)(2) and (d)(1); Counts 22 through 24, obstructing religious exercise involving an attempt to kill and use of a dangerous weapon, in violation 8 of 18 U.”
United States v. Grassie, 237 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 2001). · cites it 8× “The church arson was charged under three separate statutes: felony destruction of a church by fire, because of the religious character of the property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 247 (Count I); arson of a building or vehicle used in any activity affecting interstate commerce,…”
United States v. Ballinger, 312 F.3d 1264 (11th Cir. 2002). · cites it 12× “HILL, Circuit Judge: Jay Scott Ballinger pled guilty to four counts of church arson in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 247 (a)(1). He also pled guilty to one count providing for enhanced penalties for violation of the statute “if death results from [the defendant’s] acts,” 18 U.”
United States v. Holzer, 32 F.4th 875 (10th Cir. 2022). · cites it 7× “Holzer subsequently pleaded guilty, Appellate Case: 21-1080 Document: 010110674981 Date Filed: 04/25/2022 Page: 2 pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count of intentionally attempting to obstruct persons in the enjoyment of their free exercise of religious beliefs…”
United States v. Roof, 225 F. Supp. 3d 438 (D.S.C. 2016). · cites it 9× “§ 249 (a)(1); • Counts 13-21 allege obstruction of religious exercise resulting in death, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 247 (a)(2); • Counts 22-24 allege obstruction of religious exercise involving an attempt to kill using a weapon, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Gary Sigmund Corum, 362 F.3d 489 (8th Cir. 2004). · cites it 5× “Gary Corum appeals his conviction of three counts of intentionally obstructing or attempting to obstruct the free exercise of religious beliefs by threat of force in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 247 (a)(2), and three counts of using a telephone to threaten to injure members or…”
United States v. Barlow, 41 F.3d 935 (5th Cir. 1994). · cites it 5× “PER CURIAM: In this direct criminal appeal, we are called upon for the first time bo interpret the reach of 18 U.S.C. § 247 . In particular, we are asked to rule whether, as used in that statute, “the free exercise of religion” comprehends not only the right actively to select…”
United States v. Odom, 252 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 2001). · cites it 3× “§ 371 ), damaging religious property because of the religious character of the property ( 18 U.S.C. § 247 (a)(1)), use of fire or explosive to commit a felony prosecutable in federal court ( 18 U.”
United States v. Rhonda Anne McCoy, 323 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2× “In Ballinger , the Eleventh Circuit concluded that the federal church — arson statute, 18 U.S.C. § 247 (a)(1), could only be applied to an arson that itself had substantially affected interstate commerce.”
United States v. Robert Doggart, 947 F.3d 879 (6th Cir. 2020). · cites it 4× “See 18 U.S.C. § 247 . Doggart never challenged that conviction on this ground for one.”
United States v. Webb, 655 F.3d 1238 (11th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “See 18 U.S.C. § 247 (d)(2) (setting enhanced punishment for damaging religious property or obstructing free exercise where "bodily injury results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this…”
United States v. Marek, 238 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 2001). “” To further narrow the statute and criminalize only interstate use of the mail or any other facility, one possible phrasing would be "interstate use of a facility or the mail with intent that a murder be committed.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 247(a)(1) — 1 case
United States v. Emily Hari, 67 F.4th 903 (8th Cir. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.