18 U.S.C. § 3150
Applicability to a case removed from a State court
The provisions of this chapter apply to a criminal case removed to a Federal court from a State court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 186
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1968–2023 · leading case: United States v. John Jacob Wells, 766 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1985).
United States v. John Jacob Wells, 766 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1985). “Defendant, John Jacob Wells, was indicted for violating the federal bail-jumping statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (1982). 1 The indictment resulted from defendants’ failure to appear at the Federal Correctional Institution in Sandstone, Minnesota (FCI-Sandstone), to begin serving a…”
United States v. Goodwin, 457 U.S. 368 (1982). “The fourth count of the indictment was "failure to appear," in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 3150 .”
United States v. Jo Ann Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1980). “The first was that Markonni had probable cause to make a warrantless arrest for bail jumping under 18 U.S.C. § 3150 . 9 The government did not pursue this argument before the en banc court.”
United States v. Estel Williams, 788 F.2d 1213 (6th Cir. 1986). “Defendant appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (1) for willfully failing to appear after having been released on bond.”
United States v. John Henry Bright, Jr., 541 F.2d 471 (5th Cir. 1976). “appeals from his conviction in a jury trial for bail jumping in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3150 . 1 Bright concededly failed to comply with a lawful order to surrender himself to a United States Marshal to begin serving a sentence arising from an earlier conviction.”
United States v. Taylor, 487 U.S. 326 (1988). “See 18 U. S. C. § 3150 . For the same reason that the statute differentiated between those who fail to appear to face felony and misdemeanor charges, I would think that the severity of the pending charge would be relevant to the determination of where within the 5-year range to…”
United States v. Michael Lynn Clark, 412 F.2d 885 (5th Cir. 1969). “Appellant, Michael Lynn Clark, appeals to this court from a conviction for bail jumping under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3150 (Supp., 1969). 1 We reverse because we find that the conduct for which Clark was convicted was not an indictable offense under § 3150.”
United States of Am., Cross-Appellant v. William Scott Martin, Cross-Appellee, 704 F.2d 515 (11th Cir. 1983). “PER CURIAM: Appellant, William Scott Martin, seeks review of his conviction for willful bail *516 jumping in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 3150 (West 1969). 1 We affirm.”
State v. Mouttet, 372 N.W.2d 121 (S.D. 1985). “Under the federal act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3150 , the failure to appear as required must be willful.”
State Bar of Nevada v. Claiborne, 756 P.2d 464 (Nev. 1988). “[58] Additionally, as a result of his flight from the United States, Conforte was indicted by a federal grand jury on March 10, 1981, for failing to appear as required by the terms and conditions of his bond in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (1). [59] The State of Nevada filed…”
United States v. David Black, 543 F.2d 35 (7th Cir. 1976). “Appellant was subsequently indicted and convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 3150 , for failing to comply with an order of the district court directing him to report to the United States Marshal for commencement of his sentence.”
United States v. MacIo Singleton, 702 F.2d 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “The basis for the indictment charging Singleton with violation of the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (1976), 26 was his failure to appear for arraignment on the armed robbery charges on November 7, 14, and 21 of 1975.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.