18 U.S.C. § 3301

Securities fraud offenses

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Definition.—In this section, the term “securities fraud offense” means a violation of, or a conspiracy or an attempt to violate—(1) section 1348;(2) section 32(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78ff(a));(3) section 24 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77x);(4) section 217 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–17);(5) section 49 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–48); or(6) section 325 of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77yyy).(b)Limitation.—No person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for a securities fraud offense, unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted within 6 years after the commission of the offense.(Added Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1079A(b)(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2079.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2022 · leading case: United States v. David Lewis
United States v. David Lewis (2014) ca5 “Statute of Limitations Lewis argues that 18 U.S.C. § 3301 , which extended the applicable statute of limitations from five years to six, is a violation of the Constitution’s prohibition of ex post facto laws.”
United States v. Gentile (2017) njd “18 U.S.C. § 3301 ; see also Trans. at 33:19-34:19.”
Anderson v. Snap Inc. (2022) casd “The federal statutory category nearest to this 6 allegation is 18 U.S.C. § 3301 , but the category is so broad that it covers conduct ranging 7 from making misleading statements to violations of Securities and Exchange Commission 8 orders.”
United States v. David Lewis (2014) ca5 “Statute of Limitations Lewis argues that 18 U.S.C. § 3301 , which extended the applicable statute of limitations from five years to six, is a violation of the Constitution’s prohibition of ex post facto laws.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.