18 U.S.C. § 3443
Instructions to jury—(Rule)
Court’s instructions to jury, written requests and copies, objections, Rule 30.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2021 · leading case: United States v. Burch, Larry D.
United States v. Burch, Larry D. (1998)
“1 of the federal sentencing guidelines should the Departure Committee determine “that [appellant] had provided substantial assistance in the investigation or prosecution of another person who has committed any offense.... ” Appellee’s App.”
United States v. Ponce (1995)
“As for McTa-gue, the district court explained that its upward departure was not based on the quantity of drugs, but in recognition of “the harm to society, the sophisticated nature of the offense, and the long duration of the conspiracy.” A district court may depart upward from…”
United States v. Wendy Lois Wells (1996)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 3443 (b). To determine whether a circumstance was adequately taken into consideration by the Commission, Congress instructed courts to “consider only the sentencing guidelines, policy statements, and official commentary of the Sentencing Commission.”
Moore v. Shinn (2021)
“As the 24 Court has previously found, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3443 and 3145 are inapplicable, and because she 25 has not exhausted her state court remedies, there is no authority for the Court to issue an 26 order pertaining to her release.”
United States v. Wells (1996)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 3443 (b). To determine whether a circumstance was adequately taken into consideration by the Commission, Congress instructed courts to “consider only the sentencing guidelines, policy statements, and official commentary of the Sentencing Commission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.