U.S. Code » Title 18 » Part PART II— CRIMINAL PROCEDURE › Chapter CHAPTER 229— POSTSENTENCE ADMINISTRATION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER A— PROBATION

18 U.S.C. § 3604

Transportation of a probationer

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
A court, after imposing a sentence of probation, may direct a United States marshal to furnish the probationer with—(a) transportation to the place to which he is required to proceed as a condition of his probation; and(b) money, not to exceed such amount as the Attorney General may prescribe, for subsistence expenses while traveling to his destination.(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2002.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2018 · leading case: United States v. Steven D. Lefler, 880 F.2d 233 (9th Cir. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Steven D. Lefler, 880 F.2d 233 (9th Cir. 1989). · cites it 3× “To be able to attend the hearing on that motion, defendant moved for transportation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3604 . Since, defendant claims, the latter motion was not ruled on early enough to be of any use, he paid his own way from Petersburg, Alaska, to Anchorage, the seat of…”
Mississippi Rising Coalition v. City of Oce, 910 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 2018). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs also invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3604 (c), but it does not help their case.”
Stewart v. Crosson, 774 F.2d 158 (6th Cir. 1985). “The Court did award plaintiff costs and attorney’s fees, charging 80% against defendant Cros-son and 20% against the Furtons.”
Mississippi Rising Coalition v. City of Oce (5th Cir. 2018). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs also invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3604 (c), but it does not help their case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.