Notes of Decisions
United States v. Leroy Baker, 45 F.3d 837 (4th Cir. 1995).
· cites it 8× “Under the project, it was anticipated that the mental competency hearings required under 18 U.S.C. §§ 4245 and 4246 would be conducted by means of video conferencing.”
United States v. Horne, 955 F. Supp. 1141 (D. Minn. 1997).
· cites it 25× “The matter came before the Magistrate Judge on the United States’ Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of an Imprisoned Person under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 . The petition alleged that respondent is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect and is in need of custody…”
United States v. Ruth Muhammad, 165 F.3d 327 (5th Cir. 1999).
· cites it 9× “RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: For this expedited appeal from an order committing federal prisoner Ruth Muhammad to hospitalization for treatment, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4245 , disposition having been by a magistrate judge, acting by written consent of the parties…”
United States v. Michael J. Bean, Jr., 373 F.3d 877 (8th Cir. 2004).
· cites it 6× “Michael Bean, currently incarcerated for bank robbery, appeals from the district court’s order 2 and judgment, directing that he be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for mental illness treatment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 . For reversal, Bean argues his involuntary…”
United States v. Paul v. Oates, 560 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1977).
· cites it 2× “at 312, characterize as “evaluative reports” certificates issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4245 and findings made pursuant to 7 U.”
United States v. Harry Veltman, III, 9 F.3d 718 (8th Cir. 1994).
· cites it 5× “Harry Veltman, III appeals from an order of the district court 1 committing him for treatment of mental disease or defect under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 (1988). The sole issue raised on appeal is Veltman’s lack of representation by counsel at the hearing.”
Catanzaro v. Harry, 848 F. Supp. 2d 780 (W.D. Mich. 2012).
· cites it 3× “§§ 4245-4246 In Count II, Plaintiff asserts that Defendants violated 18 U.S.C. §§ 4245 , 4246. Section 4245 concerns the involuntary transfer of prisoners to mental health treatment facilities.”
United States v. Bryant, 670 F. Supp. 840 (D. Minn. 1987).
· cites it 9× “The United States petitioned the court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4245 , to determine the mental condition of Bryant following Bryant’s refusal to consent to psychiatric treatment.”
Sealed 1 v. Sealed 1, 767 F.3d 418 (5th Cir. 2013).
· cites it 5× “OWEN, Circuit Judge: Appellant, a federal prisoner, challenges her commitment to a mental-health treatment facility within the federal prison system pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4245 . We affirm. I The Government sought and obtained an order committing Appellant to a mental-health…”
United States v. John Digilio, 538 F.2d 972 (3d Cir. 1976).
· cites it 2× “” 18 In the somewhat analogous context of a proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 , 19 the District of Columbia Circuit discussed, but did not resolve, the issue of the burden of proof of incompetency to stand trial.”
18 U.S.C. § 4245(d): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.