Notes of Decisions
Wendy Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 793 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
“12 As the Watergate Committee recognized, much of the conduct that it exposed squarely implicated the contractor contribution statute (then 18 U.S.C. § 611 ). See Watekgate RepoRT at 440.”
Pub. Interest Legal v. NC State Bd. of Elections, 996 F.3d 257 (4th Cir. 2021).
· cites it 2× “§ 163-275 (1) (establishing that this crime is a felony offense); see also 18 U.S.C. § 611 (prohibiting aliens from voting in federal elections).”
United States v. Krueger, 809 F.3d 1109 (10th Cir. 2015).
“History confirms this reading too, for that’s exactly what § 3102’s *1122 predecessor, 18 U.S.C. § 611 (1940), provided: it empowered magistrate judges to issue warrants effective only within certain territorial limits.”
Anthony Kimani v. Eric Holder, Jr., 695 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 2012).
· cites it 2× “An alien who votes in an election violates 18 U.S.C. § 611 , and 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(10)(D)(i) adds that “[a]ny alien who has voted in violation of any Federal, State, or local constitutional provision, statute, ordinance, or regulation is inadmissible.”
Davis v. United States, 328 U.S. 582 (1946).
“217 , 228, 18 U. S. C. §§611 et seq. Even then the situations were restricted and the scope of the authority was strictly defined.”
United States v. Parker, 165 F. Supp. 2d 431 (W.D.N.Y. 2001).
“Based on the allegations, such conspiracy relates to the described theft from the West Avenue stash house which occurred on January 7, 2000, Indictment, Count III, and from Agent White on February 13, 2000, Indictment, Count IV.”
United States v. Perez, 6 F.4th 448 (2d Cir. 2021).
“5, are barred from voting in federal elections, 18 U.S.C. § 611 (a), may not serve on federal juries, 28 U.”
United States v. Ricardo Knight, 490 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2007).
“SILER, Circuit Judge: Ricardo Knight, an alien resident of the United States, appeals his conviction for improperly voting in a federal election, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 611 (a), a misdemeanor. Knight contends that § 611 is unconstitutional because it fails to incorporate a…”
State of Oklahoma v. Richard S. Schweiker, 655 F.2d 401 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
“United States Civil Service Comm’n, for example, federal highway funds were withheld from the state in an amount equal to two years’ compensation of a state highway official who had violated the Hatch Act’s prohibition of participation in political campaigns, § 12(b), 18 U.S.C.…”
Weinberg v. United States, 126 F.2d 1004 (2d Cir. 1942).
· cites it 2× “Hence, even though the statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 611 , authorizing the issuance of search warrants, does not contain an express limitation of the district court’s power to its own district, that seems clearly understood, in view of the constitutional provisions and the general rule…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Weinsten, 462 F. Supp. 243 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).
“§ 441c and its predecessor 18 U.S.C. § 611 ; and (c) illegally made contributions in the names of others, in violation of 2 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 611(a) — 2 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 611(b) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.