18 U.S.C. § 710
Cremation urns for military use
Whoever knowingly uses, manufactures, or sells any cremation urn of a design approved by the Secretary of Defense for use to retain the cremated remains of deceased members of the armed forces or an urn which is a colorable imitation of the approved design, except when authorized under regulation made pursuant to law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 78
cases, 1929–1995 · leading case: Aderhold, Warden v. Perry
Aderhold, Warden v. Perry (1932)
“Perry has since served sufficient time to complete the remainder of his original sentence if he is credited with a good time allowance under 18 USCA § 710 upon his first sentence of eighteen months, thereby accelerating the commencement and ending of the second sentence which he…”
Story v. Rives (1938)
“Nevertheless, under the provisions of section 1 of the Act of March 3, 1875, 18 U.S.C.A. § 710 , such a prisoner is entitled to deductions from his sentence when his prison record “shows that he has faithfully observed all the rules and has not been subjected to punishment” for…”
McNealy v. Johnston (1938)
“However, appellant contends that he has served this sentence, after having been given credit of eight days per month, or 480 days, for good conduct as provided for by 18 U.S.C.A. § 710 , and a further credit of 32 days which he claims is allowable for “Industrial good time…”
Chandler v. Johnston (1943)
“Although his complete sentence would not have expired until September 27, 1938, he was released on February 7, 1937, deductions from the maximum term having been allowed for good conduct ( 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 710 , 713) and for industrial employment (18 U.”
Estabrook v. King (1941)
“§§ 871-880 , providing for the establishment of a hospital for defective delinquents and the transfer of such prisoners thereto, is ex post facto as to him, because it was enacted subsequent to his conviction and sentence, and that it cannot therefore validly operate to deprive…”
United States Ex Rel. Jacobs v. Barc (1944)
“§ 710 , 18 U.S.C.A. § 710 , and 160 days industrial good time, Title 18, U.”
Brown v. Johnston (1937)
“Hence, that on February 19, 1937, when his petition was filed, he had served in full the fifteen-year sentence, and the first ten-year sentence, and that the second ten-year sentence had long since been fully satisfied after allowing good time deduction as provided by 18…”
King v. United States (1938)
“§ 710 ) would have been calculated on the basis of his two year sentence, if that sentence had been allowed to stand, and will now be calculated on the basis of his fifteen month sentence. The resentence has deprived him of his good-time allowance in'respect of the nine months…”
United States v. Greenhaus (1936)
“§ 710, title 18 ( 18 U.S.C.A. § 710 ). If in the present case there had been a single sentence with suspension and probation as to part, the decision in United States v.”
Jarman v. United States (1937)
“Under the law in effect at that time ( 18 U.S.C.A. § 710 ) his sentence, if credited with good-time allowance, would have expired on October 3, 1934.”
Hammerer v. Huff (1939)
“397 , 18 U.S.C. § 710 (1934), 18 U.S.C.A. § 710 , amounting to approximately eight months and nine days, entitled him to release on February 26, 1937, and he was on that date released from Lorton.”
Clark v. Surprenant (1938)
“Under the provisions of 18 U.S.C.A. § 710 , a prisoner in a federal penitentiary, by reason of his good behavior, is entitled to a deduction of six days from his term for each month of his sentence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.