Notes of Decisions
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 824 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
· cites it 21× “correctional officers appeal the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their Section 1983 complaint alleging that the District of Columbia deprived them of their federal right under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (“the LEOSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 926C, to carry a…”
Norris Carey, Jr. v. Joanne Throwe, 957 F.3d 468 (4th Cir. 2020).
· cites it 4× “18 U.S.C. § 926C. Two of these conditions are that the officer (i) retired in “good standing,” and (ii) currently holds a certain form of state-issued identification (i.”
Henrichs v. Ill. Law Enf't Training & Standards Bd., 306 F. Supp. 3d 1049 (E.D. Ill. 2018).
· cites it 7× “§ 1983 , William Henrichs, Myron Alexander, Robert Peluso, Joseph Rizzo, and Jeffrey Spicer-all retired Cook County or DuPage County Sheriff's Deputies-allege that the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board and Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart violated their rights…”
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 924 F.3d 570 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
· cites it 8× “18 U.S.C. § 926C(a). Ronald DuBerry, Maurice Curtis, and Robert Smith ("Appellees") formerly served as correctional officers with the Washington, D.”
Camille Burban v. City of Neptune Beach, Florida, 920 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 3× “In March 2017, Camille Burban sued Neptune Beach, Florida seeking to enforce her individual rights she believes are granted to her by the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, 18 U.S.C. § 926C. LEOSA permits qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who meet certain…”
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 106 F. Supp. 3d 245 (D.D.C. 2015).
· cites it 7× “865 , 866-67 (2004), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 926C. Subsection (a) identifies two overarching requirements-status as a “qualified retired law enforcement officer” and possession of certain identification documents: Notwithstanding any other provision of the law of any State or…”
Johnson v. State Dept. of Corr. Servs., 709 F. Supp. 2d 178 (N.D.N.Y. 2010).
· cites it 7× “") sue defendants New York State Department of Correctional Services ("DOCS"), New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services ("DCJS"), the State of New York, DOCS Commissioner Brian Fischer, DCJS Commissioner Denise O'Donnell, and New York State Governor David Paterson…”
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 316 F. Supp. 3d 43 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
· cites it 8× “ANALYSIS Plaintiffs, three retired DCDOC corrections officers, seek to compel the District of Columbia to acknowledge their status as "law enforcement officers," a prerequisite to Plaintiffs' enjoyment of the federally conferred right to carry a concealed firearm that is…”
Foley v. Godinez, 2016 IL App (1st) 151814 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
· cites it 5× “18 U.S.C. § 926C(a) (2006). ¶6 To be deemed a “qualified retired law enforcement officer” under LEOSA, a person must meet these seven requirements: (i) separation in good standing from service with a public agency as a law enforcement officer; (ii) before separation, having been…”
Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n, 979 A.2d 442 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
· cites it 4× “As support for its argument, the Commonwealth relies upon section 926C of the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. § 926C, which provides that an individual who retires in good standing from service with a public agency as a law enforcement officer, and who has…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(a) — 20 cases
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 824 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“correctional officers appeal the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their Section 1983 complaint alleging that the District of Columbia deprived them of their federal right under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (“the LEOSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 926C, to carry a…”
Henrichs v. Ill. Law Enf't Training & Standards Bd., 306 F. Supp. 3d 1049 (E.D. Ill. 2018).
“§ 1983 , William Henrichs, Myron Alexander, Robert Peluso, Joseph Rizzo, and Jeffrey Spicer-all retired Cook County or DuPage County Sheriff's Deputies-allege that the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board and Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart violated their rights…”
Norris Carey, Jr. v. Joanne Throwe, 957 F.3d 468 (4th Cir. 2020).
“18 U.S.C. § 926C. Two of these conditions are that the officer (i) retired in “good standing,” and (ii) currently holds a certain form of state-issued identification (i.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(b) — 6 cases
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 824 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“correctional officers appeal the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their Section 1983 complaint alleging that the District of Columbia deprived them of their federal right under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (“the LEOSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 926C, to carry a…”
Camille Burban v. City of Neptune Beach, Florida, 920 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 2019).
“In March 2017, Camille Burban sued Neptune Beach, Florida seeking to enforce her individual rights she believes are granted to her by the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, 18 U.S.C. § 926C. LEOSA permits qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who meet certain…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(b)(1) — 3 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(c) — 8 cases
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 924 F.3d 570 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“18 U.S.C. § 926C(a). Ronald DuBerry, Maurice Curtis, and Robert Smith ("Appellees") formerly served as correctional officers with the Washington, D.”
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 106 F. Supp. 3d 245 (D.D.C. 2015).
“865 , 866-67 (2004), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 926C. Subsection (a) identifies two overarching requirements-status as a “qualified retired law enforcement officer” and possession of certain identification documents: Notwithstanding any other provision of the law of any State or…”
Foley v. Godinez, 2016 IL App (1st) 151814 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
“18 U.S.C. § 926C(a) (2006). ¶6 To be deemed a “qualified retired law enforcement officer” under LEOSA, a person must meet these seven requirements: (i) separation in good standing from service with a public agency as a law enforcement officer; (ii) before separation, having been…”
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 316 F. Supp. 3d 43 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“ANALYSIS Plaintiffs, three retired DCDOC corrections officers, seek to compel the District of Columbia to acknowledge their status as "law enforcement officers," a prerequisite to Plaintiffs' enjoyment of the federally conferred right to carry a concealed firearm that is…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(c)(1) — 1 case
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 824 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“correctional officers appeal the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their Section 1983 complaint alleging that the District of Columbia deprived them of their federal right under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (“the LEOSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 926C, to carry a…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(c)(2) — 8 cases
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 824 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“correctional officers appeal the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their Section 1983 complaint alleging that the District of Columbia deprived them of their federal right under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (“the LEOSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 926C, to carry a…”
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 924 F.3d 570 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“18 U.S.C. § 926C(a). Ronald DuBerry, Maurice Curtis, and Robert Smith ("Appellees") formerly served as correctional officers with the Washington, D.”
Norris Carey, Jr. v. Joanne Throwe, 957 F.3d 468 (4th Cir. 2020).
“18 U.S.C. § 926C. Two of these conditions are that the officer (i) retired in “good standing,” and (ii) currently holds a certain form of state-issued identification (i.”
Henrichs v. Ill. Law Enf't Training & Standards Bd., 306 F. Supp. 3d 1049 (E.D. Ill. 2018).
“§ 1983 , William Henrichs, Myron Alexander, Robert Peluso, Joseph Rizzo, and Jeffrey Spicer-all retired Cook County or DuPage County Sheriff's Deputies-allege that the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board and Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart violated their rights…”
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 316 F. Supp. 3d 43 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“ANALYSIS Plaintiffs, three retired DCDOC corrections officers, seek to compel the District of Columbia to acknowledge their status as "law enforcement officers," a prerequisite to Plaintiffs' enjoyment of the federally conferred right to carry a concealed firearm that is…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(c)(3) — 2 cases
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 316 F. Supp. 3d 43 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“ANALYSIS Plaintiffs, three retired DCDOC corrections officers, seek to compel the District of Columbia to acknowledge their status as "law enforcement officers," a prerequisite to Plaintiffs' enjoyment of the federally conferred right to carry a concealed firearm that is…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(c)(3)(A) — 1 case
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 316 F. Supp. 3d 43 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“ANALYSIS Plaintiffs, three retired DCDOC corrections officers, seek to compel the District of Columbia to acknowledge their status as "law enforcement officers," a prerequisite to Plaintiffs' enjoyment of the federally conferred right to carry a concealed firearm that is…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(c)(4) — 2 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(c)(5) — 4 cases
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 824 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“correctional officers appeal the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their Section 1983 complaint alleging that the District of Columbia deprived them of their federal right under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (“the LEOSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 926C, to carry a…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(c)(5)(A) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(c)(l) — 1 case
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 824 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“correctional officers appeal the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their Section 1983 complaint alleging that the District of Columbia deprived them of their federal right under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (“the LEOSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 926C, to carry a…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(d) — 14 cases
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 824 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“correctional officers appeal the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their Section 1983 complaint alleging that the District of Columbia deprived them of their federal right under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (“the LEOSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 926C, to carry a…”
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 924 F.3d 570 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“18 U.S.C. § 926C(a). Ronald DuBerry, Maurice Curtis, and Robert Smith ("Appellees") formerly served as correctional officers with the Washington, D.”
Johnson v. State Dept. of Corr. Servs., 709 F. Supp. 2d 178 (N.D.N.Y. 2010).
“") sue defendants New York State Department of Correctional Services ("DOCS"), New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services ("DCJS"), the State of New York, DOCS Commissioner Brian Fischer, DCJS Commissioner Denise O'Donnell, and New York State Governor David Paterson…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(d)(1) — 5 cases
Norris Carey, Jr. v. Joanne Throwe, 957 F.3d 468 (4th Cir. 2020).
“18 U.S.C. § 926C. Two of these conditions are that the officer (i) retired in “good standing,” and (ii) currently holds a certain form of state-issued identification (i.”
Foley v. Godinez, 2016 IL App (1st) 151814 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
“18 U.S.C. § 926C(a) (2006). ¶6 To be deemed a “qualified retired law enforcement officer” under LEOSA, a person must meet these seven requirements: (i) separation in good standing from service with a public agency as a law enforcement officer; (ii) before separation, having been…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(d)(2) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(d)(2)(B) — 1 case
Foley v. Godinez, 2016 IL App (1st) 151814 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
“18 U.S.C. § 926C(a) (2006). ¶6 To be deemed a “qualified retired law enforcement officer” under LEOSA, a person must meet these seven requirements: (i) separation in good standing from service with a public agency as a law enforcement officer; (ii) before separation, having been…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(d)(2)(B)(1) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(d)(2)(B)(I) — 2 cases
Henrichs v. Ill. Law Enf't Training & Standards Bd., 306 F. Supp. 3d 1049 (E.D. Ill. 2018).
“§ 1983 , William Henrichs, Myron Alexander, Robert Peluso, Joseph Rizzo, and Jeffrey Spicer-all retired Cook County or DuPage County Sheriff's Deputies-allege that the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board and Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart violated their rights…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(d)(l) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(dA)(1) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(e) — 2 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(e)(1) — 2 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 926C(e)(2) — 1 case
Duberry v. Dist. of Columbia, 824 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“correctional officers appeal the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their Section 1983 complaint alleging that the District of Columbia deprived them of their federal right under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (“the LEOSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 926C, to carry a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.