19 U.S.C. § 1605
Seizure; custody; storage
All vessels, vehicles, aircraft, merchandise, and baggage seized under the provisions of the customs laws, or laws relating to the navigation, registering, enrolling or licensing, or entry or clearance, of vessels, unless otherwise provided by law, shall be placed and remain in the custody of the appropriate customs officer for the district in which the seizure was made to await disposition according to law.
Pending such disposition, the property shall be stored in such place as, in the customs officer’s opinion, is most convenient and appropriate with due regard to the expense involved, whether or not the place of storage is within the judicial district or the customs collection district in which the property was seized; and storage of the property outside the judicial district or customs collection district in which it was seized shall in no way affect the jurisdiction of the court which would otherwise have jurisdiction over such property.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1932–2020 · leading case: United States v. One Lear Jet Aircraft, Serial No. 35a-280, Reg. No. Yn-Bvo, Leybda Corp., Claimant-Appellant, 836 F.2d 1571 (11th Cir. 1988).
United States v. One Lear Jet Aircraft, Serial No. 35a-280, Reg. No. Yn-Bvo, Leybda Corp., Claimant-Appellant, 836 F.2d 1571 (11th Cir. 1988). “” 19 U.S.C.A. § 1605 . The legislative history of Section 1605 states that the statute was necessary to modify the traditional rule that the res “remain in the judicial district of seizure in order that the district court may have jurisdiction when condemnation proceedings are…”
United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of Twenty Three Thousand Four Hundred Eighty One Dollars, 740 F. Supp. 950 (E.D.N.Y 1990). “In the present case the governing statute is 19 U.S.C. § 1605 . Section 1605 provides: All vessels, vehicles, aircraft, merchandise, and baggage seized under the provisions of the customs laws .”
United States v. One 1974 Cessna Model 310r Aircraft, Etc., 432 F. Supp. 364 (D.S.C. 1977). “881(c)(2) is 19 U.S.C. § 1605 , which reads, in pertinent part: *369 Pending such disposition, the property shall be stored in such place as, in the customs officer’s opinion, is most convenient and appropriate with due regard to the expense involved, whether or not the place of…”
United States v. 392 Copies of a Magazine Entitled \Exclusive\"", 253 F. Supp. 485 (D. Maryland 1966). “See also cases in 19 U.S.C.A. § 1605 , n. 2 and n. 3. Conclusion re.”
B & F Trawlers, Inc. v. United States, 27 Fed. Cl. 299 (Fed. Cl. 1992). “19 U.S.C. § 1605 (1988) requires that: All vessels, vehicles, aircraft, merchandise, and baggage seized under the provisions of the customs laws .”
Lee v. Thornton, 538 F.2d 27 (2d Cir. 1976). “19 U.S.C. § 1605 provides that all vehicles seized under the provisions of the customs laws shall be in the custody of the collector of the district in which the seizure is made; § 1606 provides for appraisal.”
Doe v. United States, 65 Fed. Cl. 184 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “Customs is also required by 19 U.S.C. § 1605 4 to store seized property.”
United States v. $255,427.15 in U.S. Currency, 841 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (S.D. Ga. 2012). “) The Defendant Currency has been deposited into a United States Customs and Border Protection suspense account and will be stored in said account during the pendency of this action in accordance with 19 U.S.C. § 1605 . (Id. ¶ 2.) On July 16, 2010, Plaintiff United States of…”
United States v. One 1951 Douglas DC-6 Aircraft, 667 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1981). “The court is of the opinion that 19 U.S.C. § 1605 , which authorizes the kind of storage transfer made in this case, permits forfeiture actions to be brought in the district where the property was seized regardless of where the customs officer chooses to store the property after…”
Hewitt v. Nat'l Sur. Corp., 130 F. Supp. 110 (N.D. Ga. 1955). “Thereafter Marshal Doyle proceeded to condemn said gambling devices under Title 19 U.S.C.A. § 1605 et seq. Marshal Doyle caused a notice of such seizure to be published in accordance with the requirements of the law and followed the procedure provided by that law in every…”
Resource Club, Ltd. v. United States, 491 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “7 In addition, Congress charged Cus *1301 toms with storing seized goods, pending their disposition, in accordance with 19 U.S.C. § 1605 , which, in relevant part reads: [p]ending such disposition, the property shall be stored in such place as, in the customs officer’s opinion,…”
United States v. One Million Three Hundred Twenty-Two Thousand Two Hundred Forty-Two Dollars & Fifty-Eight Cents, 938 F.2d 433 (3rd Cir. 1991). “§ 881 (d) generally incorporates the laws relating to customs seizures and forfeitures; that one such provision, 19 U.S.C. § 1605 , provides that jurisdiction over seized property is not affected by the storage of the property outside the district pending disposition of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.