19 U.S.C. § 1624
General regulations
In addition to the specific powers conferred by this chapter the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases, 1945–2015 · leading case: United States v. Mead Corp.
United States v. Mead Corp. (2001)
“We are not, of course, here making any global statement about Customs's authority, for it is true that the general rulemaking power conferred on Customs, see 19 U. S. C. § 1624 , authorizes some regulation with the force of law, or "legal norms," as we put it in Haggar, 526 U.”
Barr v. United States (1945)
“590 , 759, 19 U.S.C. § 1624 , and Boske v. Comingore, 177 U.”
Elkem Metals Company v. United States (2006)
“As a threshold matter, we note that Commerce has the authority to “make such rules and regulations as may be nec *802 essary to carry out” section 1677b(e), see 19 U.S.C. § 1624 , 3 and that Commerce’s policy on the exclusion of VAT from constructed value was promulgated through…”
Motorola, Inc, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States (2006)
“At the outset, we note that 19 U.S.C. § 1624 empowers Customs to make “rules and regulations” to implement section 1625, and that 19 C.”
Vivitar Corporation v. The United States, and 47th Street Photo, Inc., Intervenor (1985)
“The regulations were issued pursuant to general authority under 19 U.S.C. § 1624 . In contrast, § 1526(d)(2) contains a specific delegation of legislative type authority to the Secretary with respect to importations for personal use and specific authority to issue regulations in…”
United States v. Robert Glenn Moore, United States of America v. Michael English (1980)
“Even if the officer believed that appellants had violated the civil regulations promulgated under authority of 19 U.S.C. § 1624 , these were not “crimes.”
United States v. Eight (8) Rhodesian Stone Statues (1978)
“The regula *201 tion which is of critical importance in the instant case is found at 19 C.F.R. § 162 .”
American Fiber & Finishing, Inc. v. United States (2015)
“1 (d)(1) (Customs’ regulation providing the definition of a ‘‘ruling,’’ promulgated pursuant to Commerce’s authority under 19 U.S.C. § 1624 ). 23 . S.Rep. No. 103-189, at 64 (1993) (discussing the purpose of 19 U.”
United States v. Rockwell Automation Inc. (2006)
“” 19 U.S.C. § 1624 (2000); see also 19 U.S.”
National Corn Growers Ass'n v. Baker (1986)
“§ 3’s grant to the Secretary of the Treasury of the “superintendence of the collection of the duties on imports as he shall judge best” or the power to promulgate rules and regulations encompassed in 19 U.S.C. § 1624 or the authority to prescribe forms of entries found in 19 U.”
American Bayridge Corp. v. United States (1998)
“”); see also 19 U.S.C. § 1624 (1994) (“In addition to the specific powers conferred by this chapter the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter”).”
United States v. Ross (1983)
“” 19 U.S.C. § 1624 (1982). Further, the administering agency is to be accorded “great deference” by the courts in determining whether a regulation conforms to the statutory mandate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.