19 U.S.C. § 2483
Consequential changes in Tariff Schedules of the United States
The President shall from time to time, as appropriate, embody in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States the substance of the relevant provisions of this chapter, and of other Acts affecting import treatment, and actions thereunder, including removal, modification, continuance, or imposition of any rate of duty or other import restriction.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: West Bend Co., Div. of Dart Indus., Inc. v. United States, 576 F. Supp. 630 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983).
West Bend Co., Div. of Dart Indus., Inc. v. United States, 576 F. Supp. 630 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). “2073 , 19 U.S.C. § 2483 ) and Section 503(a)(2)(A) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 ( 93 Stat.”
V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump (Fed. Cir. 2025). “In imposing the Reciprocal Tariffs, the President again invoked his claimed authority under IEEPA; the NEA; sec- tion 604 of the Trade Act of 1974 (codified as amended at 19 U.S.C. § 2483 ); and 3 U.S.C. § 301 . 7 Id.”
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (D.D.C. 2025). “’ Transfer Reply at 5; 19 U.S.C. § 2483 . This case “arises out of” the substantive law under which the President acted—IEEPA—not the HTSUS.”
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (2026). “Where, as here, such modifications are made under an “Act[ ] affecting import treatment,” 19 U. S. C. §2483 , they are “considered to be statu- tory provisions of law for all purposes,” §3004(c)(1)(C).”
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump Revisions: 2/23/26 (2026). “Where, as here, such modifications are made under an “Act[ ] affecting import treatment,” 19 U. S. C. §2483 , they are “considered to be statu- tory provisions of law for all purposes,” §3004(c)(1)(C).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.