U.S. Code » Title 2 » Chapter CHAPTER 6— CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS

2 U.S.C. § 190g

Nonconsideration of certain private bills and resolutions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

No private bill or resolution (including so-called omnibus claims or pension bills), and no amendment to any bill or resolution, authorizing or directing (1) the payment of money for property damages, for personal injuries or death for which suit may be instituted under the Federal Tort Claims Act, or for a pension (other than to carry out a provision of law or treaty stipulation); (2) the construction of a bridge across a navigable stream; or (3) the correction of a military or naval record, shall be received or considered in either the Senate 11 See Partial Repeal note below. or the House of Representatives.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1961–1981 · leading case: United States v. Muniz, 374 U.S. 150 (1963).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Muniz, 374 U.S. 150 (1963). · cites it 2× “831 , 2 U. S. C. § 190g. 7 Act of August 13, 1935, 49 Stat.”
Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 285 (Ct. Cl. 1979). “2 U.S.C. § 190g. The conjunction of these statutes implies that the Secretaries have a duty as well as the power to afford servicemen proper relief.”
William B. Ogden v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Sec'y of the Air Force, 298 F.2d 312 (D.C. Cir. 1961). · cites it 2× “831 (1946), 2 U.S.C. § 190g (1958), 2 U.S.C.A. § 190g.”
Henry Winston v. United States, 305 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1962). · cites it 3× “831 (1946); 2 U.S.C.A. § 190g. .The system of private bills led to inequalities in the administration of justice and imposed a heavy burden on Congress.”
Joseph S. Neal v. Sec'y of the Navy & Commandant of the Marine Corps, 639 F.2d 1029 (3rd Cir. 1981). “2 U.S.C. § 190g. The conjunction of these statutes implies that the Secretaries have a duty as well as the power to afford servicemen proper relief.”
Glines v. Wade, 586 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1978). “2 U.S.C. § 190g. BCMRs are not necessarily legally trained.”
Small v. United States, 219 F. Supp. 659 (D. Del. 1963). “2 U.S.C. § 190g. 1 . 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2671-2680.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.