2 U.S.C. § 190g
Nonconsideration of certain private bills and resolutions
No private bill or resolution (including so-called omnibus claims or pension bills), and no amendment to any bill or resolution, authorizing or directing (1) the payment of money for property damages, for personal injuries or death for which suit may be instituted under the Federal Tort Claims Act, or for a pension (other than to carry out a provision of law or treaty stipulation); (2) the construction of a bridge across a navigable stream; or (3) the correction of a military or naval record, shall be received or considered in either the Senate 1
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1961–1981 · leading case: United States v. Muniz
United States v. Muniz (1963)
“831 , 2 U. S. C. § 190g. 7 Act of August 13, 1935, 49 Stat.”
Sanders v. United States (1979)
“2 U.S.C. § 190g. The conjunction of these statutes implies that the Secretaries have a duty as well as the power to afford servicemen proper relief.”
William B. Ogden v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air Force (1961)
“831 (1946), 2 U.S.C. § 190g (1958), 2 U.S.C.A. § 190g.”
Henry Winston v. United States (1962)
“831 (1946); 2 U.S.C.A. § 190g. .The system of private bills led to inequalities in the administration of justice and imposed a heavy burden on Congress.”
Joseph S. Neal v. Secretary of the Navy and Commandant of the Marine Corps (1981)
“2 U.S.C. § 190g. The conjunction of these statutes implies that the Secretaries have a duty as well as the power to afford servicemen proper relief.”
Glines v. Wade (1978)
“2 U.S.C. § 190g. BCMRs are not necessarily legally trained.”
Small v. United States (1963)
“2 U.S.C. § 190g. 1 . 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2671-2680.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.