2 U.S.C. § 437c

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 96 cases, 1975–2013 · leading case: Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985). · cites it 6× “1281 , and amended, 2 U. S. C. § 437c(b)(1), which provides that the FEC "shall have exclusive jurisdiction with respect to the civil enforcement" of the Fund Act.”

Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976). · cites it 2× “Do the provisions in the challenged statutes concerning the powers and method of appointment of the Federal Election Commission violate the rights of one or more of the plaintiffs under the constitutional separation of powers, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, or Ninth Amendment,…”

McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). · cites it 4× “C, constituted pursuant to FECA, 2 U.S.C. § 437c, and charged with enforcing the Act as amended by BCRA.”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88 (1994). · cites it 4× “3 , as amended, 2 U. S. C. § 437c(b)(1). The FECA governs various aspects of all federal elections, see 2 U.”

Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975). · cites it 5× “Do the provisions in the challenged statutes concerning the powers and method of appointment of the Federal Election Commission violate the rights of one or more of the plaintiffs under the constitutional separation of powers, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, or Ninth Amendment,…”

Staebler v. Carter, 464 F. Supp. 585 (D.D.C. 1979). · cites it 6× “It follows that a construction of 2 U.S.C. § 437c which would preclude the President from making a recess appointment in this situation — i.”

Bowsher v. Synar, 478 U.S. 714 (1986). “, 2 U. S. C. § 437c (Federal Election Commission).”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nra Political Victory Fund, 6 F.3d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1993). · cites it 2× “2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(1) (1988). It is argued that the reconstituted Commission still violates separation of powers principles in several respects.”

Romero-Barcelo v. Acevedo-Vila, 275 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D.P.R. 2003). · cites it 4× “” 2 U.S.C. § 437c(b)(l); see Fed. Election Comm’n v.”

Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66 (1975). “But the Amendments created a Federal Election Commission, 2 U. S. C. § 437c (a)(1) (1970 ed., Supp.”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Right to Work Comm., 459 U.S. 197 (1982). “See 2 U. S. C. §§437c(b)(l) and 437d(a) and (e) (1976 ed.”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Repub. Senatorial Comm., 966 F.2d 1471 (D.C. Cir. 1992). · cites it 2× “2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(l). Four votes are needed for the Commission to find probable cause.”

Show all 96 citing cases →

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(a) — 1 case

Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “Do the provisions in the challenged statutes concerning the powers and method of appointment of the Federal Election Commission violate the rights of one or more of the plaintiffs under the constitutional separation of powers, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, or Ninth Amendment,…”

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(1) — 8 cases

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nra Political Victory Fund, 6 F.3d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(1) (1988). It is argued that the reconstituted Commission still violates separation of powers principles in several respects.”

Hagelin v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 411 F.3d 237 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008).

Weber v. Heaney, 793 F. Supp. 1438 (D. Minnesota 1992).

Illinois Campaign for Political Reform v. Illinois State Bd. of Elections, 886 N.E.2d 1220 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(2) — 2 cases

Common Cause v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 842 F.2d 436 (D.C. Cir. 1988).

Wilkinson v. Legal Servs. Corp., 865 F. Supp. 891 (D.D.C. 1994).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(2)(A)(i) — 1 case

Staebler v. Carter, 464 F. Supp. 585 (D.D.C. 1979). “It follows that a construction of 2 U.S.C. § 437c which would preclude the President from making a recess appointment in this situation — i.”

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(2)(B) — 4 cases

Corus Grp. PLC v. Bush, 217 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2002).

Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 239 F. Supp. 2d 1367 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2002).

MacKie v. Clinton, 827 F. Supp. 56 (D.D.C. 1993).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(2)(C) — 1 case

MacKie v. Clinton, 827 F. Supp. 56 (D.D.C. 1993).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(2)(D) — 1 case

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(5) — 1 case

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(l) — 10 cases

John L. Wright v. Terry L. Morris, 111 F.3d 414 (6th Cir. 1997).

In Re Sealed Case, 223 F.3d 775 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Repub. Senatorial Comm., 966 F.2d 1471 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(l). Four votes are needed for the Commission to find probable cause.”

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(b) — 4 cases

Martin Tractor Co. v. Fed. Election Comm'n Nat'l Chamber All. for Politics v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 627 F.2d 375 (D.C. Cir. 1980).

Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2008).

Nat'l Repub. Cong. Comm., an Unincorporated Ass'n v. Legi-Tech Corp. (Two Cases), 795 F.2d 190 (D.C. Cir. 1986).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(b)(1) — 12 cases

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985). “1281 , and amended, 2 U. S. C. § 437c(b)(1), which provides that the FEC "shall have exclusive jurisdiction with respect to the civil enforcement" of the Fund Act.”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88 (1994). “3 , as amended, 2 U. S. C. § 437c(b)(1). The FECA governs various aspects of all federal elections, see 2 U.”

McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “C, constituted pursuant to FECA, 2 U.S.C. § 437c, and charged with enforcing the Act as amended by BCRA.”

Richard J. Orloski v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 795 F.2d 156 (D.C. Cir. 1986).

Combat Vets. for Cong. Political Action Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(b)(2) — 2 cases

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Gus Savage for Cong. '82 Comm., 606 F. Supp. 541 (N.D. Ill. 1985).

Antosh v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 599 F. Supp. 850 (D.D.C. 1984).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(b)(I) — 1 case

Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(b)(l) — 33 cases

Fed. Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88 (1994). “3 , as amended, 2 U. S. C. § 437c(b)(1). The FECA governs various aspects of all federal elections, see 2 U.”

Romero-Barcelo v. Acevedo-Vila, 275 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D.P.R. 2003). “” 2 U.S.C. § 437c(b)(l); see Fed. Election Comm’n v.”

McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “C, constituted pursuant to FECA, 2 U.S.C. § 437c, and charged with enforcing the Act as amended by BCRA.”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Right to Work Comm., 459 U.S. 197 (1982). “See 2 U. S. C. §§437c(b)(l) and 437d(a) and (e) (1976 ed.”

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(c) — 10 cases

Democratic Cong. Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 831 F.2d 1131 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Repub. Senatorial Comm., 966 F.2d 1471 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “2 U.S.C. § 437c(a)(l). Four votes are needed for the Commission to find probable cause.”

Marcus v. Holder, 574 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980).

Comm. to Elect Lyndon La Rouche, Lyndon La Rouche & Leroy B. Jones v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 613 F.2d 834 (D.C. Cir. 1980).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437c(e) — 1 case

Common Cause v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 108 F.3d 413 (D.C. Cir. 1997).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.