2 U.S.C. § 437g

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 266 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). · cites it 9× “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). · cites it 6× “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
California Med. Ass'n v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 453 U.S. 182 (1981). · cites it 6× “First, such questions may arise in the course of an enforcement proceeding brought by the Commission under 2 U. S. C. § 437g (1976 ed. and Supp. III).”
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). · cites it 13× “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998). · cites it 4× “has occurred," 2 U. S. C. § 437g(a)(1) (emphasis added), but accords a right to judicial relief only to "[a]ny party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party," § 437g(a)(8)(A) (emphasis added).”
Nat. Law Party of the United States v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 111 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2000). · cites it 11× “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). After the completion of the investigation, if the FEC determines by an affirmative vote of four members that there is “probable cause” to believe that a violation has taken place, it must attempt to reach a conciliation agreement.”
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). · cites it 14× “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 335 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2004). · cites it 15× “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). If the Commission finds that a reason to believe exists, it can proceed to “make an investigation of [the] alleged violation, which may include a field investigation or audit, in accordance with the provisions of [section 437g(a) ].”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). · cites it 4× “1995) (discussing 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)) — an option that would make no sense if enforcement of these statutes couldn’t protect the two Congressmen’s interests.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985). · cites it 4× “Consistent with FEC's supervisory role, Congress provided an administrative complaint procedure in 2 U. S. C. § 437g, through which the Democrats could have pursued their dispute with the PACs.”
Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66 (1975). · cites it 4× “” 2 U. S. C. § 437g (a) (1) (A) (1970 ed., Supp.”
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976). · cites it 2× “"(c) Does 2 U. S. C. § 437g (a) violate such rights, in that it empowers the Federal Election Commission and the Attorney General to bring civil actions (including proceedings for injunctions) against any person who has engaged or who may engage in acts or practices which…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(12) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(5)(A) — 1 case
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Adams, 558 F. Supp. 2d 982 (C.D. Cal. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(6) — 1 case
Friends of Queen v. Hise, 735 S.E.2d 229 (N.C. Ct. App. 2012).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(8)(A) — 6 cases
Coalition for Mercury-free Drugs v. Sebelius, 725 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(8)(C) — 1 case
Buchanan v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 112 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2000).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a) — 15 cases
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975).
Unity08 v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 596 F.3d 861 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Larry R. Williams, 104 F.3d 237 (9th Cir. 1996).
Beam v. Gonzales, 548 F. Supp. 2d 596 (N.D. Ill. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1) — 23 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998). “has occurred," 2 U. S. C. § 437g(a)(1) (emphasis added), but accords a right to judicial relief only to "[a]ny party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party," § 437g(a)(8)(A) (emphasis added).”
Nader v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 823 F. Supp. 2d 53 (D.D.C. 2011).
Fam. Trust Found. of Kentucky, Inc. v. Wolnitzek, 345 F. Supp. 2d 672 (E.D. Ky. 2004).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(10) — 4 cases
Walther v. Baucus, 467 F. Supp. 93 (D. Mont. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(12) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
Stockman v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 138 F.3d 144 (5th Cir. 1998).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Franklin, 718 F. Supp. 1272 (E.D. Va. 1989).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(12)(A) — 13 cases
In re Sealed Case, 237 F.3d 657 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 919 (D.D.C. 2003).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
In Re Sealed Case 00-5116, 254 F.3d 233 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(12)(B) — 2 cases
Spannaus v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 641 F. Supp. 1520 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).
Stockman v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 138 F.3d 144 (5th Cir. 1998).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2) — 52 cases
Spannaus v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 641 F. Supp. 1520 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).
La Botz v. Fed. Election Comm'n of Washington, D.C., 61 F. Supp. 3d 21 (D.D.C. 2014).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
In re Sealed Case, 237 F.3d 657 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. T. Bertram Lance, 617 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(3) — 16 cases
Am. Jewish Cong. v. Juanita M. Kreps, Sec'y of Com., 574 F.2d 624 (D.C. Cir. 1978).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
Reader's Digest Ass'n v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 509 F. Supp. 1210 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(3)(A) — 2 cases
Rose v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 608 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1985).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Florida for Kennedy Comm., 492 F. Supp. 587 (S.D. Fla. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(3)(B) — 2 cases
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
United States v. Jackson, 433 F. Supp. 239 (W.D.N.Y. 1977).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4) — 11 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am., 553 F. Supp. 1331 (D.D.C. 1983).
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Legi-Tech, Inc., 75 F.3d 704 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
Ralph J. Galliano v. United States Postal Serv., 836 F.2d 1362 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(A) — 5 cases
Ralph J. Galliano v. United States Postal Serv., 836 F.2d 1362 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
Fec v. Nrsc, 877 F. Supp. 15 (D.D.C. 1995).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(A)(I) — 2 cases
KEAN FOR Cong. Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 398 F. Supp. 2d 26 (D.D.C. 2005).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Adams, 558 F. Supp. 2d 982 (C.D. Cal. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(A)(i) — 20 cases
In Re Sealed Case, 223 F.3d 775 (D.C. Cir. 2000).
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 362 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2005).
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 335 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2004). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). If the Commission finds that a reason to believe exists, it can proceed to “make an investigation of [the] alleged violation, which may include a field investigation or audit, in accordance with the provisions of [section 437g(a) ].”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(A)(ii) — 1 case
Rose v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 608 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1985).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(B) — 1 case
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Citizens for Freeman, 602 F. Supp. 1250 (D. Maryland 1985).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(B)(i) — 3 cases
Reagan Bush Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 525 F. Supp. 1330 (D.D.C. 1981).
Wilson v. Daily News of the Virgin Islands, 881 F.2d 82 (3rd Cir. 1989).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(B)(ii) — 2 cases
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(C)(i) — 1 case
Conway for Senate v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 966 F. Supp. 2d 748 (W.D. Ky. 2013).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(C)(ii) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(C)(iii) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(C)(v) — 2 cases
McChesney v. Petersen, 275 F. Supp. 3d 1123 (D. Neb. 2016).
McChesney v. Peterson, 226 F. Supp. 3d 920 (D. Neb. 2016).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5) — 2 cases
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5)(A) — 6 cases
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5)(B) — 7 cases
Common Cause v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 628 F.2d 179 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. California Med. Ass'n, 502 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. Cal. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5)(C) — 11 cases
Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Hsia, 24 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 1998).
Marcus v. Holder, 574 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2009).
Ralph J. Galliano v. United States Postal Serv., 836 F.2d 1362 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
United States v. Trie, 23 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 1998).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5)(D) — 7 cases
Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, Pllc, 683 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2010).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
United States v. Hsia, 24 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 1998).
United States v. Tonry, 433 F. Supp. 620 (E.D. La. 1977).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(6) — 11 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985). “Consistent with FEC's supervisory role, Congress provided an administrative complaint procedure in 2 U. S. C. § 437g, through which the Democrats could have pursued their dispute with the PACs.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am., 553 F. Supp. 1331 (D.D.C. 1983).
Ralph J. Galliano v. United States Postal Serv., 836 F.2d 1362 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Reagan Bush Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 525 F. Supp. 1330 (D.D.C. 1981).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(6)(A) — 29 cases
Sossamon v. Texas, 179 L. Ed. 2d 700 (2011).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Harvey Furgatch, 807 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1987).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(6)(B) — 10 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Harvey Furgatch, 869 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1989).
Fed. Election Com'n v. Friends of Jane Harman, 59 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (C.D. Cal. 1999).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. California Med. Ass'n, 502 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. Cal. 1980).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Ted Haley Cong. Comm., 654 F. Supp. 1120 (W.D. Wash. 1987).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(6)(C) — 5 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Christian Action Network, 894 F. Supp. 946 (W.D. Va. 1995).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. California Med. Ass'n, 502 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. Cal. 1980).
Fed. Elec. Com'n v. Amer. Intern. Demographic Serv., 629 F. Supp. 317 (E.D. Va. 1986).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(7) — 6 cases
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Weinsten, 462 F. Supp. 243 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).
Common Cause v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 628 F.2d 179 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Right to Work Comm., 501 F. Supp. 422 (D.D.C. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8) — 40 cases
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “1995) (discussing 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)) — an option that would make no sense if enforcement of these statutes couldn’t protect the two Congressmen’s interests.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Common Cause v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 842 F.2d 436 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 335 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2004). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). If the Commission finds that a reason to believe exists, it can proceed to “make an investigation of [the] alleged violation, which may include a field investigation or audit, in accordance with the provisions of [section 437g(a) ].”
Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)(A) — 51 cases
Nat. Law Party of the United States v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 111 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2000). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). After the completion of the investigation, if the FEC determines by an affirmative vote of four members that there is “probable cause” to believe that a violation has taken place, it must attempt to reach a conciliation agreement.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998). “has occurred," 2 U. S. C. § 437g(a)(1) (emphasis added), but accords a right to judicial relief only to "[a]ny party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party," § 437g(a)(8)(A) (emphasis added).”
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 362 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2005).
Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 293 F. Supp. 2d 41 (D.D.C. 2003).
Fam. Trust Found. of Kentucky, Inc. v. Wolnitzek, 345 F. Supp. 2d 672 (E.D. Ky. 2004).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)(B) — 6 cases
Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 854 F.2d 1330 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Absalom F. Jordan, Jr. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 68 F.3d 518 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
Common Cause v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 630 F. Supp. 508 (D.D.C. 1985).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)(C) — 33 cases
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 335 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2004). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). If the Commission finds that a reason to believe exists, it can proceed to “make an investigation of [the] alleged violation, which may include a field investigation or audit, in accordance with the provisions of [section 437g(a) ].”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Campaign Legal Ctr. v. FEC, 952 F.3d 352 (D.C. Cir. 2020).
Rose v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 608 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1985).
Richard J. Orloski v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 795 F.2d 156 (D.C. Cir. 1986).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(9) — 12 cases
Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66 (1975). “” 2 U. S. C. § 437g (a) (1) (A) (1970 ed., Supp.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Harvey Furgatch, 807 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1987).
Walther v. Baucus, 467 F. Supp. 93 (D. Mont. 1979).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Harvey Furgatch, 869 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1989).
Walther v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 82 F.R.D. 200 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(9)(A) — 2 cases
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979).
Walther v. Stewart, 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(9)(C) — 5 cases
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979).
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1044 (D.D.C. 1979).
Walther v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 82 F.R.D. 200 (D.D.C. 1979).
Walther v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 468 F. Supp. 1235 (D.D.C. 1979).
Walther v. Stewart, 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(l) — 50 cases
Nat. Law Party of the United States v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 111 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2000). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). After the completion of the investigation, if the FEC determines by an affirmative vote of four members that there is “probable cause” to believe that a violation has taken place, it must attempt to reach a conciliation agreement.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998). “has occurred," 2 U. S. C. § 437g(a)(1) (emphasis added), but accords a right to judicial relief only to "[a]ny party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party," § 437g(a)(8)(A) (emphasis added).”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(l)(7) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(l2)(A) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(ll) — 2 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Gus Savage for Cong. '82 Comm., 606 F. Supp. 541 (N.D. Ill. 1985).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Florida for Kennedy Comm., 492 F. Supp. 587 (S.D. Fla. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(aX3) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(aX4)(A)(i) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(aX8)(C) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(aXl) — 1 case
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1044 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(c) — 2 cases
Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d) — 13 cases
Emily's List v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 581 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
United States v. Hsia, 24 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 1998).
Unity08 v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 596 F.3d 861 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. James Toledano, 317 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2003).
Aristotle Int'l, Inc. v. NGP Software, Inc., 714 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(1)(A) — 4 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
United States v. Danielczyk, 917 F. Supp. 2d 573 (E.D. Va. 2013).
Athens Lumber Co. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 689 F.2d 1006 (11th Cir. 1982).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(1)(A)(i) — 2 cases
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(1)(D) — 1 case
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(2) — 2 cases
Marcus v. Holder, 574 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2009).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(l) — 1 case
United States v. Trie, 21 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 1998).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(l)(A) — 8 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
United States v. F. Whittemore, 776 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2015).
Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 854 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D.D.C. 2012).
United States v. Hsia, 24 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 1998).
Faucher v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 743 F. Supp. 64 (D. Me. 1990).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(l)(A)(i) — 3 cases
United States v. Danielczyk, 683 F.3d 611 (4th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011).
United States v. Sorenson, 233 F. Supp. 3d 690 (S.D. Iowa 2017).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(l)(D) — 1 case
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.