2 U.S.C. § 437g
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 266
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
California Med. Ass'n v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 453 U.S. 182 (1981). “First, such questions may arise in the course of an enforcement proceeding brought by the Commission under 2 U. S. C. § 437g (1976 ed. and Supp. III).”
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998). “has occurred," 2 U. S. C. § 437g(a)(1) (emphasis added), but accords a right to judicial relief only to "[a]ny party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party," § 437g(a)(8)(A) (emphasis added).”
Nat. Law Party of the United States v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 111 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2000). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). After the completion of the investigation, if the FEC determines by an affirmative vote of four members that there is “probable cause” to believe that a violation has taken place, it must attempt to reach a conciliation agreement.”
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 335 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2004). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). If the Commission finds that a reason to believe exists, it can proceed to “make an investigation of [the] alleged violation, which may include a field investigation or audit, in accordance with the provisions of [section 437g(a) ].”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “1995) (discussing 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)) — an option that would make no sense if enforcement of these statutes couldn’t protect the two Congressmen’s interests.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985). “Consistent with FEC's supervisory role, Congress provided an administrative complaint procedure in 2 U. S. C. § 437g, through which the Democrats could have pursued their dispute with the PACs.”
Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66 (1975). “” 2 U. S. C. § 437g (a) (1) (A) (1970 ed., Supp.”
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976). “"(c) Does 2 U. S. C. § 437g (a) violate such rights, in that it empowers the Federal Election Commission and the Attorney General to bring civil actions (including proceedings for injunctions) against any person who has engaged or who may engage in acts or practices which…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(12) — 1 case
Carter-Mondale Reelection Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 642 F.2d 538 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(5)(A) — 1 case
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Adams, 558 F. Supp. 2d 982 (C.D. Cal. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(6) — 1 case
Friends of Queen v. Hise, 735 S.E.2d 229 (N.C. Ct. App. 2012).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(8)(A) — 6 cases
Lindemann v. Comm'n on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices, 2008 ME 187 (Me. 2008).
Coalition for Mercury-free Drugs v. Sebelius, 725 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010).
Coalition for Mercury Free Drugs v. Leavitt (D.D.C. 2010).
Coalition for Mercury Free Drugs v. Leavitt (D.D.C. 2010).
Coalition for Mercury Free Drugs v. Leavitt (D.D.C. 2010).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(8)(C) — 1 case
Buchanan v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 112 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2000).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a) — 15 cases
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975).
Unity08 v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 596 F.3d 861 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Larry R. Williams, 104 F.3d 237 (9th Cir. 1996).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 333 F.3d 168 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
Beam v. Gonzales, 548 F. Supp. 2d 596 (N.D. Ill. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1) — 23 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998). “has occurred," 2 U. S. C. § 437g(a)(1) (emphasis added), but accords a right to judicial relief only to "[a]ny party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party," § 437g(a)(8)(A) (emphasis added).”
Nader v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 823 F. Supp. 2d 53 (D.D.C. 2011).
Fam. Trust Found. of Kentucky, Inc. v. Wolnitzek, 345 F. Supp. 2d 672 (E.D. Ky. 2004).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(10) — 4 cases
Bread Political Action Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 455 U.S. 577 (1982).
Bread Political Action Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 591 F.2d 29 (7th Cir. 1979).
Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 678 F.2d 1092 (D.C. Cir. 1982).
Walther v. Baucus, 467 F. Supp. 93 (D. Mont. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(12) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. MacHinists Non-Partisan Political League, 655 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
Stockman v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 138 F.3d 144 (5th Cir. 1998).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Franklin, 718 F. Supp. 1272 (E.D. Va. 1989).
Carter-Mondale Reelection Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 642 F.2d 538 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(12)(A) — 13 cases
In re Sealed Case, 237 F.3d 657 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 919 (D.D.C. 2003).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
In Re Sealed Case 00-5116, 254 F.3d 233 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 333 F.3d 168 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(12)(B) — 2 cases
Spannaus v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 641 F. Supp. 1520 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).
Stockman v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 138 F.3d 144 (5th Cir. 1998).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2) — 52 cases
Spannaus v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 641 F. Supp. 1520 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).
La Botz v. Fed. Election Comm'n of Washington, D.C., 61 F. Supp. 3d 21 (D.D.C. 2014).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
In re Sealed Case, 237 F.3d 657 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. T. Bertram Lance, 617 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(3) — 16 cases
Am. Jewish Cong. v. Juanita M. Kreps, Sec'y of Com., 574 F.2d 624 (D.C. Cir. 1978).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
Reader's Digest Ass'n v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 509 F. Supp. 1210 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).
Providence Journal Co. v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 460 F. Supp. 762 (D.R.I. 1978).
The Washington Post Co. v. United States Dep't of State, 685 F.2d 698 (D.C. Cir. 1982).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(3)(A) — 2 cases
Rose v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 608 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1985).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Florida for Kennedy Comm., 492 F. Supp. 587 (S.D. Fla. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(3)(B) — 2 cases
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
United States v. Jackson, 433 F. Supp. 239 (W.D.N.Y. 1977).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4) — 11 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am., 553 F. Supp. 1331 (D.D.C. 1983).
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Legi-Tech, Inc., 75 F.3d 704 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. to Elect Lyndon La Rouche, 613 F.2d 849 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
Ralph J. Galliano v. United States Postal Serv., 836 F.2d 1362 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(A) — 5 cases
Democratic Party of United States v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 578 F. Supp. 797 (E.D. Pa. 1983).
Ralph J. Galliano v. United States Postal Serv., 836 F.2d 1362 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Repub. Senatorial Comm., 877 F. Supp. 15 (D.D.C. 1995).
Fec v. Nrsc, 877 F. Supp. 15 (D.D.C. 1995).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(A)(I) — 2 cases
KEAN FOR Cong. Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 398 F. Supp. 2d 26 (D.D.C. 2005).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Adams, 558 F. Supp. 2d 982 (C.D. Cal. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(A)(i) — 20 cases
In Re Sealed Case, 223 F.3d 775 (D.C. Cir. 2000).
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 362 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2005).
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 335 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2004). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). If the Commission finds that a reason to believe exists, it can proceed to “make an investigation of [the] alleged violation, which may include a field investigation or audit, in accordance with the provisions of [section 437g(a) ].”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Repub. Senatorial Comm., 966 F.2d 1471 (D.C. Cir. 1992).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(A)(ii) — 1 case
Rose v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 608 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1985).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(B) — 1 case
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Citizens for Freeman, 602 F. Supp. 1250 (D. Maryland 1985).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(B)(i) — 3 cases
Reagan Bush Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 525 F. Supp. 1330 (D.D.C. 1981).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Illinois Med. Political Action Comm. (Impac), 503 F. Supp. 45 (N.D. Ill. 1980).
Wilson v. Daily News of the Virgin Islands, 881 F.2d 82 (3rd Cir. 1989).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(B)(ii) — 2 cases
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 333 F.3d 168 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(C)(i) — 1 case
Conway for Senate v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 966 F. Supp. 2d 748 (W.D. Ky. 2013).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(C)(ii) — 1 case
Combat Vets. for Cong. Political Action Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(C)(iii) — 1 case
Combat Vets. for Cong. Political Action Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(4)(C)(v) — 2 cases
McChesney v. Petersen, 275 F. Supp. 3d 1123 (D. Neb. 2016).
McChesney v. Peterson, 226 F. Supp. 3d 920 (D. Neb. 2016).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5) — 2 cases
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Cent. Long Island Tax Reform Immediately Comm., 616 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5)(A) — 6 cases
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
Martin Tractor Co. v. Fed. Election Comm'n Nat'l Chamber All. for Politics v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 627 F.2d 375 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Hall-Tyner Election Campaign Comm., 524 F. Supp. 955 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).
Combat Vets. for Cong. Political Action Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5)(B) — 7 cases
Common Cause v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 628 F.2d 179 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
Bread Political Action Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 591 F.2d 29 (7th Cir. 1979).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Hall-Tyner Election Campaign Comm., 678 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1982).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. California Med. Ass'n, 502 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. Cal. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5)(C) — 11 cases
Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Hsia, 24 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 1998).
Marcus v. Holder, 574 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2009).
Ralph J. Galliano v. United States Postal Serv., 836 F.2d 1362 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
United States v. Trie, 23 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 1998).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(5)(D) — 7 cases
Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, Pllc, 683 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2010).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
United States v. Hsia, 24 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 1998).
United States v. Tonry, 433 F. Supp. 620 (E.D. La. 1977).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(6) — 11 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985). “Consistent with FEC's supervisory role, Congress provided an administrative complaint procedure in 2 U. S. C. § 437g, through which the Democrats could have pursued their dispute with the PACs.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am., 553 F. Supp. 1331 (D.D.C. 1983).
Ralph J. Galliano v. United States Postal Serv., 836 F.2d 1362 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Reagan Bush Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 525 F. Supp. 1330 (D.D.C. 1981).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(6)(A) — 29 cases
Sossamon v. Texas, 179 L. Ed. 2d 700 (2011).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nra Political Victory Fund, 6 F.3d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1993).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Harvey Furgatch, 807 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1987).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. of 100 Democrats, 844 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc., 769 F.2d 13 (1st Cir. 1985).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(6)(B) — 10 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Harvey Furgatch, 869 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1989).
Fed. Election Com'n v. Friends of Jane Harman, 59 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (C.D. Cal. 1999).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. California Med. Ass'n, 502 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. Cal. 1980).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Ted Haley Cong. Comm., 654 F. Supp. 1120 (W.D. Wash. 1987).
FED. ELECTION COM'N v. John A. Dramesi for Cong. Comm., 640 F. Supp. 985 (D.N.J. 1986).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(6)(C) — 5 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 (2001).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Christian Action Network, 894 F. Supp. 946 (W.D. Va. 1995).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. California Med. Ass'n, 502 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. Cal. 1980).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Am. Int'l Demographic Servs., Inc., 629 F. Supp. 317 (E.D. Va. 1986).
Fed. Elec. Com'n v. Amer. Intern. Demographic Serv., 629 F. Supp. 317 (E.D. Va. 1986).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(7) — 6 cases
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Weinsten, 462 F. Supp. 243 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations (Afl- Cio) v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 628 F.2d 97 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
Common Cause v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 628 F.2d 179 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Right to Work Comm., 501 F. Supp. 422 (D.D.C. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8) — 40 cases
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “1995) (discussing 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)) — an option that would make no sense if enforcement of these statutes couldn’t protect the two Congressmen’s interests.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Common Cause v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 842 F.2d 436 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 335 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2004). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). If the Commission finds that a reason to believe exists, it can proceed to “make an investigation of [the] alleged violation, which may include a field investigation or audit, in accordance with the provisions of [section 437g(a) ].”
Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)(A) — 51 cases
Nat. Law Party of the United States v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 111 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2000). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). After the completion of the investigation, if the FEC determines by an affirmative vote of four members that there is “probable cause” to believe that a violation has taken place, it must attempt to reach a conciliation agreement.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998). “has occurred," 2 U. S. C. § 437g(a)(1) (emphasis added), but accords a right to judicial relief only to "[a]ny party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party," § 437g(a)(8)(A) (emphasis added).”
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 362 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2005).
Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 293 F. Supp. 2d 41 (D.D.C. 2003).
Fam. Trust Found. of Kentucky, Inc. v. Wolnitzek, 345 F. Supp. 2d 672 (E.D. Ky. 2004).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)(B) — 6 cases
Edward W. Spannaus, Treasurer of the Larouche Democratic Campaign v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 990 F.2d 643 (D.C. Cir. 1993).
Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 854 F.2d 1330 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Absalom F. Jordan, Jr. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 68 F.3d 518 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
Common Cause v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 630 F. Supp. 508 (D.D.C. 1985).
Lyndon H. Larouche Larouche Democratic Campaign '88 v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 990 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1993).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)(C) — 33 cases
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 335 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2004). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). If the Commission finds that a reason to believe exists, it can proceed to “make an investigation of [the] alleged violation, which may include a field investigation or audit, in accordance with the provisions of [section 437g(a) ].”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Campaign Legal Ctr. v. FEC, 952 F.3d 352 (D.C. Cir. 2020).
Rose v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 608 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1985).
Richard J. Orloski v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 795 F.2d 156 (D.C. Cir. 1986).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(9) — 12 cases
Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66 (1975). “” 2 U. S. C. § 437g (a) (1) (A) (1970 ed., Supp.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Harvey Furgatch, 807 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1987).
Walther v. Baucus, 467 F. Supp. 93 (D. Mont. 1979).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Harvey Furgatch, 869 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1989).
Walther v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 82 F.R.D. 200 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(9)(A) — 2 cases
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979).
Walther v. Stewart, 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(9)(C) — 5 cases
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979).
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1044 (D.D.C. 1979).
Walther v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 82 F.R.D. 200 (D.D.C. 1979).
Walther v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 468 F. Supp. 1235 (D.D.C. 1979).
Walther v. Stewart, 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(l) — 50 cases
Nat. Law Party of the United States v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 111 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2000). “2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(2). After the completion of the investigation, if the FEC determines by an affirmative vote of four members that there is “probable cause” to believe that a violation has taken place, it must attempt to reach a conciliation agreement.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998). “has occurred," 2 U. S. C. § 437g(a)(1) (emphasis added), but accords a right to judicial relief only to "[a]ny party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party," § 437g(a)(8)(A) (emphasis added).”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Congressman Charles G. Rose, 806 F.2d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Fourth, a judicial order in 1984, when the District Court ruled on the merits, may well have adversely affected the FEC’s ability to attend to "activities of a higher or competing priority,” not the least of which was the Presidential election of that year.”
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 177 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001). “The process by which the FEC enforces FECA is set forth fully in 2 U.S.C. § 437g, which is known as the ''Enforcement” provision.”
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 437g (a)(5)(D). Appellees also find support for their position in language used by Senator Clark in his successful opposition to a provision in the original 1976 Senate bill that would have barred the Department of Justice from instituting a criminal prosecution if…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(l)(7) — 1 case
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations (Afl- Cio) v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 628 F.2d 97 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(l2)(A) — 1 case
John Doe Co. 1 v. Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau (D.D.C. 2015).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(ll) — 2 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Gus Savage for Cong. '82 Comm., 606 F. Supp. 541 (N.D. Ill. 1985).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Florida for Kennedy Comm., 492 F. Supp. 587 (S.D. Fla. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(aX3) — 1 case
Fed. Election Comm'n v. MacHinists Non-Partisan Political League, 655 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(aX4)(A)(i) — 1 case
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Illinois Med. Political Action Comm. (Impac), 503 F. Supp. 45 (N.D. Ill. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(aX8)(C) — 1 case
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, Nat'l Repub. Senatorial Comm., Intervenor, 660 F.2d 773 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(aXl) — 1 case
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1044 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(c) — 2 cases
Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008).
Geoffrey Fieger v. US Attorney Gen. (6th Cir. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d) — 13 cases
Emily's List v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 581 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
United States v. Hsia, 24 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 1998).
Unity08 v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 596 F.3d 861 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. James Toledano, 317 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2003).
Aristotle Int'l, Inc. v. NGP Software, Inc., 714 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(1)(A) — 4 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
United States v. Robert H. Hopkins, Jr., Morten Hopkins, & John W. Harrell, 916 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1990).
United States v. Danielczyk, 917 F. Supp. 2d 573 (E.D. Va. 2013).
Athens Lumber Co. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 689 F.2d 1006 (11th Cir. 1982).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(1)(A)(i) — 2 cases
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011).
United States v. William Danielczyk, Jr. (4th Cir. 2012).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(1)(D) — 1 case
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(2) — 2 cases
Marcus v. Holder, 574 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2009).
Jon Marcus v. Eric H. Holder Jr. (9th Cir. 2009).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(l) — 1 case
United States v. Trie, 21 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 1998).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(l)(A) — 8 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1), (2) (FEC authorized to investigate potential election law violations brought to its attention by private-party complaints); supra Findings 61b, 64b at pages 329-31; see also Chamber of Commerce Br.”
United States v. F. Whittemore, 776 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2015).
Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 854 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D.D.C. 2012).
United States v. Hsia, 24 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 1998).
Faucher v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 743 F. Supp. 64 (D. Me. 1990).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(l)(A)(i) — 3 cases
United States v. Danielczyk, 683 F.3d 611 (4th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011).
United States v. Sorenson, 233 F. Supp. 3d 690 (S.D. Iowa 2017).
— 2 U.S.C. § 437g(d)(l)(D) — 1 case
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.