20 U.S.C. § 1755
Additional priority of remedies after finding of de jure segregation
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1975–2008 · leading case: Bd. of Educ., Joliet Tp. v. Bd. of Educ., 897 N.E.2d 756 (Ill. 2008).
Bd. of Educ., Joliet Tp. v. Bd. of Educ., 897 N.E.2d 756 (Ill. 2008). “…use busing to remedy de jure segregation “unless the court first finds that all alternative remedies are inadequate.” 20 U.S.C. §1755 (2000).”
Evans v. Buchanan, 447 F. Supp. 982 (D. Del. 1978). “20 U.S.C. § 1755 ; see Morgan v. Kerrigan, supra, 401 F.”
Morgan v. Kerrigan, 401 F. Supp. 216 (D. Mass. 1975). “20 U.S.C. § 1755 . Mandatory transportation by chartered bus refers to the service that the School Department shall provide for students assigned to elementary schools which are more than 1 mile from home; for middle school students who live more than 1% miles; and for students…”
United States v. City of Yonkers, 888 F. Supp. 591 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). “” 20 U.S.C. § 1755 . The remedial plan that was devised ten years ago for the Yonkers school system, to which the State would become a party if found liable at this stage of the proceedings, utilizes, albeit to a minimal degree, mandatory busing.”
Bd. of Educ., Joliet Twp. High Sch. Dist. No. 204 v. Bd. of Educ., Lincoln Way Cmty. High Sch. Dist. No. 210 (Ill. 2008). “” 20 U.S.C. §1755 (2000). -24- district of such agency providing the appropriate grade level and type of education for such student; *** (e) the transfer by an educational agency, whether voluntary or otherwise, of a student from one school to another if the purpose and effect…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.