21 U.S.C. § 857
Repealed. Pub. L. 101–647, title XXIV, § 2401(d), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4859
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2023 · leading case: Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States, 511 U.S. 513 (1994).
Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States, 511 U.S. 513 (1994). “3207 -51, formerly codified, as amended, at 21 U. S. C. § 857 , and the question whether the Act is unconstitutionally vague as applied to petitioners.”
United States v. Bryan Burwell, 690 F.3d 500 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “” 21 U.S.C. § 857 (a) (1988); see 511 U.S. at 516.”
Elonis v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2001 (2015). “In applying the presumption in favor of scienter, the Court concluded that “although the Government must establish that the defendant knew that the items at issue are likely to be used with illegal drugs, it need not prove specific knowledge that the items are ‘drug…”
United States v. Main Street Distrib. Inc., 700 F. Supp. 655 (E.D.N.Y 1988). “e: Defendant Stephen Pesce was initially charged in a one-count indictment with having knowingly and willfully offered for sale in interstate commerce various articles of drug paraphernalia, specifically, five hundred vials with small spoons attached, primarily intended and…”
United States v. Schneiderman, 777 F. Supp. 258 (S.D.N.Y. 1991). “(“Insertion Advertising”) have been charged in a fourteen count indictment with selling and conspiring to sell drug paraphernalia through the services of an interstate conveyance under 21 U.S.C. § 857 and with laundering and conspiring to launder the proceeds of such sales under…”
United States v. Jerry Schneiderman, Jerry Ranallo, Larry Butler & Insertion Advert. Corp., 968 F.2d 1564 (2d Cir. 1992). “Sweet, Judge, which dismissed a fourteen-count indictment charging violations of the Mail Order Drug Paraphernalia Control Act, 21 U.S.C. § 857 , 1 based on a determination that the statute is unconstitutionally vague.”
United States v. 57,261 Items of Drug Paraphernalia, 705 F. Supp. 1256 (M.D. Tenn. 1988). “For the reasons set forth in this memorandum, the Court finds that the three seized shipments of cigarette holders, ceramic pipes and water pipes are drug paraphernalia as defined by 21 U.S.C. § 857 . The Court further finds that these ceramic cigarette holders, ceramic pipes…”
United States v. Dyer, 750 F. Supp. 1278 (E.D. Va. 1990). “The government’s original 302 Count, sixty-nine-page indictment against alleged drug paraphernalia manufacturers, distributors and retailers, and their trade association represents one of the first criminal prosecutions in the nation under the Mail Order Drug Paraphernalia Act,…”
United States v. Vance Murphy, D/B/A the Store Linda Wallace, D/B/A the Store, 977 F.2d 503 (10th Cir. 1992). “The government appeals from the district court’s order dismissing a twelve-count indictment charging violation of the Mail Order Drug Paraphernalia Control *504 Act, 21 U.S.C. § 857 . 1 Judge J. Thomas Greene of the United States District Court for the Central Division of Utah…”
Gary Thibodeau v. Leonard Portuondo, 486 F.3d 61 (2d Cir. 2007). “2d 539 (1994), this Court, confronted with a vagueness challenge to 21 U.S.C. § 857’s proscription of the interstate or foreign sale of “drug paraphernalia,” found no constitutional infirmity because the law defined “drug paraphernalia” by enumerating fifteen examples of the…”
Matheney v. Commonwealth, 191 S.W.3d 599 (Ky. 2006). “In Posters `N' Things, the Court considered a challenge to the Mail Order Drug Paraphernalia Control Act, 21 U.S.C. § 857 , which contained a lengthy definition of drug paraphernalia, 511 U.”
United States v. Paul Eugene Mason, 52 F.3d 1286 (4th Cir. 1995). “In an eleven-count superseding bill of indictment, filed August 27, 1992, Mason was charged with sale of drug paraphernalia, use of the mails to transport drug paraphernalia, and importation of drug paraphernalia in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 857 (repealed Nov. 29, 1990), 21 U.”
— 21 U.S.C. § 857(e)(5) — 1 case
United States v. Main Street Distrib. Inc., 700 F. Supp. 655 (E.D.N.Y 1988). “e: Defendant Stephen Pesce was initially charged in a one-count indictment with having knowingly and willfully offered for sale in interstate commerce various articles of drug paraphernalia, specifically, five hundred vials with small spoons attached, primarily intended and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.