21 U.S.C. § 961
Prohibited acts B
1988—Pub. L. 100–690 inserted “or fails to notify the Attorney General of an importation or exportation under section 971 of this title”.
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–690 effective 120 days after
Section effective on first day of seventh calendar month that begins after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1979–1996 · leading case: United States v. Luis Montenegro-Rojo
United States v. Luis Montenegro-Rojo (1990)
“Since a term of supervised release is required by 21 U.S.C. § 961 and 21 U.S.C. § 841 , it is obvious that Congress used the phrase "as a part of the sentence” synonymously with the phrase "in addition to such term of imprisonment.”
United States v. Jaime Gomez-Tostado (1979)
“Compare 21 U.S.C. § 961 with 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (b)(1), 960(b)(1).”
United States v. Ronnie Bazel, Jr. (1996)
“§ 960 , however, while § 3553 references 21 U.S.C. § 961 . Because Bazel pled guilty to a violation of 21 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.