U.S. Code » Title 22 » Chapter CHAPTER 77— UNITED STATES-CHINA RELATIONS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— GENERAL PROVISIONS

22 U.S.C. § 613

TIBET NEGOTIATIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 22 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Policy.—“(1)In general.—The President and the Secretary should encourage the Government of the People’s Republic of China to enter into a dialogue without preconditions with the Dalai Lama or his representatives or democratically-elected leaders of the Tibetan community leading to a negotiated agreement on Tibet and should coordinate with other governments in multilateral efforts toward this goal.“(2)Policy communication.—The Secretary of State shall ensure that, in accordance with this Act, United States policy on Tibet, as coordinated by the United States Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues, is communicated to all Federal departments and agencies in contact with the Government of the People’s Republic of China.“(3)Compliance.—After such an agreement is reached, the President and the Secretary should work to ensure compliance with the agreement.“(b)Periodic Reports.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Department of State Authorities Act, Fiscal Year 2017, Improvements Act [Dec. 18, 2017], and annually thereafter until December 31, 2031, the President shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees and direct the Department of State to make public on its website a report on—“(1) the steps taken by the President and the Secretary in accordance with subsection (a)(1) to implement the Tibetan Policy Act of 2002;“(2) the status of any discussions between the People’s Republic of China and the Dalai Lama or his representatives or a successor selected by a method of the 14th Dalai Lama’s own choosing or the representatives of such successor;“(3) the steps taken by the United States Government to promote the human rights and distinct religious, cultural, linguistic, and historical identity of the Tibetan people, including the right of the Tibetan people to select, educate, and venerate their own religious leaders in accordance with their established religious practice and system; and“(4) efforts to counter disinformation about Tibet from the Government of the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Communist Party, including disinformation about the history of Tibet, the Tibetan people, and Tibetan institutions, including that of the Dalai Lama.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1942–2026 · leading case: Attorney General of the United States v. Irish Northern Aid Committee
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Attorney General of the United States v. Irish Northern Aid Committee (1981) nysd · cites it 3× “” In a series of affirmative defenses, the defendant alleges harassment and victimization by various illegal Government activities; that the Act is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to INAC; that the action is barred by laches; that the action results from illegal…”
United States v. Bijan Rafiekian (2021) ca4 “See 22 U.S.C. § 613 (h); 28 C.F.R. § 5.307 . 6 As discussed in detail below, this case involves two distinct notification statutes— 18 U.”
Mitchell Block, President, Direct Cinema Ltd., Inc. v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United States (1986) cadc “1139 (1942), thereby causing Congress to add a special exception from registration when necessary to protect United States defense interests, see 22 U.S.C. § 613 (f). More fundamentally, however, both the abstract speculation and the reality of the legislative history are beside…”
Attorney General of the United States of America v. The Irish People, Inc. (1982) cadc “22 U.S.C. § 613 (f) (1976). . Id. . H.R.Rep.”
United States v. John Peter McGoff (1987) cadc “22 U.S.C. § 613 . . Section 611(b) provides: (b) The term “foreign principal” includes— *1075 (1) a government of a foreign country and a foreign political party; (2) a person outside of, the United States, unless it is established that such person is an individual and a citizen…”
American Airways Charters, Inc. v. Donald Regan, Secretary of the Treasury (1984) cadc “244 , 246 (codified at 22 U.S.C. § 613 (g) (1982)). Congress further amended a separate section of the Act to ensure that attorneys engaging in "routine .”
Viereck v. United States (1942) cadc · cites it 3× “1244 , 1245, 22 U.S.C.A. § 613 . The 1938 Act required a supplemental statement in six months.”
Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States v. Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin (1963) cadc · cites it 2× “254 , 22 U.S.C. § 613 . . 52 Stat. 632 , as amended, 56 Stat.”
Attorney General of the United States v. Covington & Burling (1976) dcd “The Foreign Agents Registration Act does deal partially with the question of confidential communications between a foreign interest and its attorney in 22 U.S.C. § 613 . That section exempts certain “agents of foreign principals” from the disclosure requirements of §§ 612 and…”
Schonbrun v. Dreiband (1967) nyed “§ 613 (g)) expressly exempting from registration one who is engaged in the legal representation of a disclosed foreign agent before any court, it would seem that the defendant would now be exempt from registration. 5 Plaintiff further claims that the issues identified in…”
Broidy Capital Management LLC v. Muzin (2022) dcd “22 U.S.C. § 613 (a). 9 The parties dispute whether the Southern District of New York squarely addressed the meaning of the Vienna Conventions.”
Zavadovsky v. Republic of Austria (2026) dcd “See 22 U.S.C. § 613 (g). Dvoinik v. Rolff, 2024 WL 2974475 , at *5.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.