25 U.S.C. § 13
Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the United States grants its permission to the State of Minnesota to transfer land to the White Earth Band as described in section 10(a)(1) which prior to the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 24, 1986 ] may have been obtained by the State pursuant to other Federal law or with Federal assistance. Any restrictions or conditions imposed by any other Federal law or regulation on the transfer of such land are hereby waived and removed.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 101
cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1944–2026 · leading case: Samish Indian Nation v. United States
Samish Indian Nation v. United States (2005)
“) These statutes include, among others, the Snyder Act, 25 U.S.C. § 13 . (FAC ¶¶ 5(b), 28.) Finally, in a third count, the Samish alleged that since their federal recognition in 1996 the government has continued to withhold funds that should have been provided under the same…”
United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe (2003)
“208 , as amended, 25 U. S. C. § 13 , and the National Historic Preservation Act, 80 Stat.”
Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation (1980)
“See 25 U. S. C. § 13 (1970 ed.), as construed in Morton v.”
Morton v. Ruiz (1974)
“The Court of Appeals’ reversal of the District Court’s summary judgment for the Secretary was on the ground that the Manual’s residency limitation was inconsistent with the broad language of the Snyder Act, 25 U.”
Texas v. United States (2007)
“2d 270 (1974) (payment of general assistance benefits authorized under 25 U.S.C. § 13 ); Seminole Nation v. United States, 316 U.”
Lincoln v. Vigil (1993)
“208 , as amended, 25 U. S. C. § 13 , and the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, 90 Stat.”
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States (2001)
“” The Tribe alleged that its claim arose under the 1960 Act, as well as the Snyder Act (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 13 ), the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (codified at 16 U.”
Ramah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM (1982)
“208 (1921), 25 U. S. C. § 13 ; Johnson-O'Malley Act, 48 Stat.”
HOBBS EX. REL. HOBBS v. Zenderman (2009)
“" 25 U.S.C. § 13 . The BIA limited benefits eligibility to Indians residing on a reservation or otherwise under BIA jurisdiction based on a provision in the Indian Affairs Manual, which was unpublished and not generally available to the public.”
Ford v. Moore (1996)
“[ 25 U.S.C. § 13 ]...." 25 U.S.C. § 1616 (a)(1995).”
Erikson v. United States (1987)
“1 Second, plaintiff alleges that he was an intended third party beneficiary of the funding agreement between the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Tribe.”
Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Burwell (2016)
“A congressional majority, however, wished for the funding to continue and passed the Snyder Act, 25 U.S.C. § 13 , to give the Bureau of Indian Affairs broad discretion to direct programs that would benefit American Indians’ health: The Bureau of Indian Affairs, under the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.