25 U.S.C. § 450
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 241
cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case: Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011).
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). “" 25 U.S.C. § 450 (a)(1). Contracts for programs absolutely essential to self-government, such as law enforcement, economic development, and natural resource management, have become "unworkable" in the words of a tribal representative.”
Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, 447 U.S. 134 (1980). “2203 , 25 U. S. C. § 450 et seq., evidence to varying degrees a congressional concern with fostering tribal self-government and economic development, but none goes so far as to grant tribal enterprises selling goods to nonmembers an artificial competitive advantage over all…”
Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2005). “2203 , as amended, 25 U. S. C. § 450 et seq. (2000 ed. and Supp.”
Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM, 458 U.S. 832 (1982). “2203 (1975), 25 U. S. C. § 450 et seq. (Self-Determination Act).”
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 750 (2016). “2203 , 25 U.S.C. § 450 et seq., in 1975 to help Indian tribes assume responsibility for aid programs that benefit their members.”
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980). “" Similar policies underlie the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, 25 U. S. C. § 450 et seq., as well as the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.”
Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla., 498 U.S. 505 (1991). “2203 , 25 U. S. C. § 450 et seq. These Acts reflect Congress' desire to promote the "goal of Indian self-government, including its `overriding goal' of encouraging tribal self-sufficiency and economic development.”
Iowa Mut. Ins. v. LaPlante, 480 U.S. 9 (1987). “, 25 U. S. C. §§ 450 , 450a (Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act); 25 U.”
Ford v. Moore, 1996 SD 112 (S.D. 1996). “They argued the CHRP contract was authorized under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450 et seq (ISDEAA), and because the federal government waived its sovereign immunity in contracts under this Act, jurisdiction belonged exclusively in…”
Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter, 132 S. Ct. 2181 (2012). “The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assis- tance Act (ISDA), 25 U. S. C. §450 et seq., directs the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with will- ing tribes, pursuant to which those tribes will provide services such as education and law enforcement that…”
S. Ute Indian Tribe v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1071 (10th Cir. 2011). “" 25 U.S.C. § 450 l (a). The model agreement states that the contract shall attach and incorporate by reference an "annual funding agreement.”
Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico, 490 U.S. 163 (1989). “2203 , 25 U. S. C. § 450 et seq. Although these statutes "evidence to varying degrees a congressional concern with fostering tribal self-government and economic development," Washington v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.