U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XXVIII— UTE INDIANS OF UTAH: DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS BETWEEN MIXED-BLOOD AND FULL-BLOOD MEMBERS; TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION OVER PROPERTY OF MIXED-BLOOD MEMBERS

25 U.S.C. § 677a

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases, 1972–2020 · leading case: Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972). · cites it 2× “25 U. S. C. §§ 677a (b) and (c). The provision as to choice is § 4 of the Act, 25 U.”
Felter v. Salazar, 679 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010). · cites it 2× “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). Mixed-bloods were defined as Ute members who did not have sufficient Ute or Indian ancestry to qualify as full-bloods.”
Felter, Oranna v. Kempthorne, Dirk, 473 F.3d 1255 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). “Mixed-blood” Utes — members of the tribe who do not meet these criteria, id.”
Chapoose v. Clark, 607 F. Supp. 1027 (D. Utah 1985). · cites it 3× “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). None of the plaintiffs meet this blood-quantum requirement.”
Felter v. Norton, 412 F. Supp. 2d 118 (D.D.C. 2006). “25 U.S.C. § 677a. The UPA’s definitions of mixed-bloods and full-bloods were based on the Ute General Council’s definitions.”
United States v. Oranna Bumgarner Felter, 752 F.2d 1505 (10th Cir. 1985). “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b), (c). The Act required the preparation and publication of rolls listing the full-blood and mixed-blood members of the Tribe.”
Ute Distrib. Corp., a Utah Corp. v. Ute Indian Tribe, 149 F.3d 1260 (10th Cir. 1998). “The "mixed-blood" group was comprised of those individuals who either did not possess sufficient Indian or Ute Indian blood to qualify as a full-blood tribal member or became a mixed-blood member by choice under provisions of the UPA. See id.”
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed. Cl. 349 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “Plaintiffs’ request for class action certification is dismissed as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment dismissing the complaint.”
Tabbee v. United States, 30 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 1993). “” It defines a “mixed-blood” member as one who either does not possess sufficient Indian or Ute Indian blood to fall within the full-blood class or one who becomes a "mixed-blood” by choice---25 U.S.C. §§ 677a(b) and (c). . These provisions were patterned after a Resolution…”
Ute Distrib. Corp. v. United States, 721 F. Supp. 1202 (D. Utah 1989). “The Act defines “asset" to mean "all property of the Tribe, real, personal or mixed, whether held by the tribe or by the United States in trust for the tribe_" 25 U.S.C. § 677a. 15 . It is urged by plaintiffs that since neither mixed-bloods nor corporations organized for their…”
Maldonado v. Hodel, 683 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Utah 1988). “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b) and (c). 2 On April 5, 1956, final membership roles were published, listing 490 tribal members as mixed bloods and 1,314 tribal members as full-bloods.”
United States v. Murdock, 919 F. Supp. 1534 (D. Utah 1996). “The names of defendant’s parents were on the final mixed-blood role published in the Federal Register in 1956 pursuant to the Ute Partition and Termination Act 25 U.S.C. § 677a et seq., as numbers 301 and 302 respectively.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b) — 12 cases
Felter, Oranna v. Kempthorne, Dirk, 473 F.3d 1255 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). “Mixed-blood” Utes — members of the tribe who do not meet these criteria, id.”
Chapoose v. Clark, 607 F. Supp. 1027 (D. Utah 1985). “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). None of the plaintiffs meet this blood-quantum requirement.”
Felter v. Salazar, 679 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010). “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). Mixed-bloods were defined as Ute members who did not have sufficient Ute or Indian ancestry to qualify as full-bloods.”
United States v. Oranna Bumgarner Felter, 752 F.2d 1505 (10th Cir. 1985). “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b), (c). The Act required the preparation and publication of rolls listing the full-blood and mixed-blood members of the Tribe.”
Ute Distrib. Corp., a Utah Corp. v. Ute Indian Tribe, 149 F.3d 1260 (10th Cir. 1998). “The "mixed-blood" group was comprised of those individuals who either did not possess sufficient Indian or Ute Indian blood to qualify as a full-blood tribal member or became a mixed-blood member by choice under provisions of the UPA. See id.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 677a(c) — 6 cases
Felter v. Salazar, 679 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010). “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). Mixed-bloods were defined as Ute members who did not have sufficient Ute or Indian ancestry to qualify as full-bloods.”
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed. Cl. 349 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “Plaintiffs’ request for class action certification is dismissed as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment dismissing the complaint.”
Hackford v. Babbitt, 14 F.3d 1457 (10th Cir. 1994).
Ute Distrib. Corp. v. United States, 938 F.2d 1157 (10th Cir. 1991).
UTE Distrib. Corp. v. Sec'y of the Interior, 624 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (D. Utah 2008).
— 25 U.S.C. § 677a(f) — 1 case
Hackford v. Babbitt, 14 F.3d 1457 (10th Cir. 1994).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.