26 U.S.C. § 203
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1929–2023 · leading case: Great Southern Life Ins. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Great Southern Life Ins. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1937)
“The five questions presented are: (1) Whether personal property taxes paid by petitioner to the State of Texas during the years 1928, 1929, and 1930, respectively, under its laws, constituted deductible investment expenses within the meaning of section 203 (a) (5) of the Revenue…”
Commissioner v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance (1977)
“523 ; Internal Revenue Code of 1939, § 203 (a), 26 U. S. C. § 203 (a) (1952 ed.). [10] Like the parties, we will emphasize the role of these concepts in the relevant calculations.”
Pink v. United States (1939)
“No such intention can be deduced from the language of section 247, which we are considering. Lewis v. Commissioner, 3 Cir.”
New World Life Ins. Co. v. United States (1939)
“The first question involves a construction of section 203(a) (5), Revenue Act of 1928, 26 U.S.C.A. § 203 (a) (5), which relates to the deduction allowable to a life insurance company in respect of investment expenses.”
George P. Shultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. E. E. Falk, Individually and as a Partner in (1971)
“The enterprise concept embodied in 26 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s) requires as part of the definition of “enterprise engaged in commerce” that there be “employees engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce, including employees handling, selling, or otherwise working on…”
Newman, Saunders & Co. v. United States (1929)
“230 ) and section 203 (b) (4) of the act of 1924 (26 US CA § 203 (b) (4), provided that no gain or loss should be recognized on the kind of transfer under consideration, there was nothing to be added or substracted from the cost of the securities to the original transferor in…”
Helvering v. Montana Life Ins. (1936)
“261 ( 26 U.S.C.A. § 203 note) ; Revenue Acts 1924 and 1926, § 245 (a) (8), 43 Stat.”
Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev. (1937)
“The questions presented arise by reason of the disallowance by the Board of deductions claimed by the petitioner as interest on indebtedness under paragraph 8 of subsection (a) of section 203 of the statute referred to ( 26 U.S.C.A. § 203 note). The points in controversy fall…”
Commissioner v. Illinois Life Ins. (1935)
“791 , § 203 ( 26 U.S.C.A. § 203 note), provides that net income of life insurance companies shall include gross income, less, among other items, “4 per centum of the mean of the reserve funds required by law and held at the beginning and end of the taxable year.”
MONDRAGON v. SUSHITOBOX (2023)
“The term “employer” is defined as “any person acting directly or indirectly in the interests of an employer in relation to an employee,” 26 U.S.C. § 203 (d), and has been broadly interpreted to “effectuate the FLSA’s liberal, remedial purposes,” Qu Wang v.”
United States v. Indianapolis Athletic Club, Inc. (1993)
“The conclusion which the Court reaches today also is consistent with regulations promulgated under 26 U.S.C. § 203 (m), which outlines minimum wage calculations for tipped employees.”
United States v. Eleven Five-Gallon Stills (1930)
“26, USC (26 USCA § 203): “Manufactures of stills shall each pay $50, and $20 for each still or worm for distilling made by him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.