Notes of Decisions
Est. of Mclemore v. Mclemore, 63 So. 3d 468 (Miss. 2011).
· cites it 6× “See 26 U.S.C.A. § 2207A (2006). It provides the following: (1) In general.”
In Re Est. of Miller, 595 N.E.2d 630 (Ill. App. Ct. 1992).
· cites it 8× “The example given in the regulation to illustrate the application of section 2207A of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.A. §2207A (West 1989)) indicates that where a deceased husband’s will created a Q/TIP trust with the income payable to the wife for life and the wife’s will…”
Firstar Trust Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of Kenosha, 541 N.W.2d 467 (Wis. 1995).
· cites it 10× “Cooney (Estate), reimbursement pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 2207A of federal estate taxes and interest from the cross-respondent-petitioner Firstar Trust Company, Trustee (Trust), from the qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) Marital Trust created under the will of Daniel H.”
Eisenbach v. Schneider, 140 Wash. App. 641 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 8× “The court also concluded that they had effectively waived the application of the recovery provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 2207A. Thus, the court concluded that Roy’s decision in administering Martha Eisenbach’s estate to allocate the burden of estate taxes in accordance with the…”
Eisenbach v. Schneider, 166 P.3d 858 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 7× “The court also concluded that they had effectively waived the application of the recovery provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 2207A. Thus, the court concluded that Roy's decision in administering Martha Eisenbach's estate to allocate the burden of estate taxes in accordance with the…”
Maurice F. Jones Trust v. Barnett Banks, 637 N.E.2d 1301 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 6× “Jones Trust in Louise's estate should be paid by FWNB pursuant to 26 U.S.C.A. § 2207A (1981) of the Internal Revenue Code.”
Firstar Trust Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of Kenosha, 525 N.W.2d 53 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 7× “The personal representative of Dorothy's estate filed a claim against the beneficiaries of the trust, alleging that pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 2207A(a), the estate was entitled to recover the federal estate tax from the trust.”
In re the Est. of Kramer, 203 A.D.2d 78 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994).
“12 permit a surviving spouse’s estate to recover estate taxes attributable to marital deduction property from the person receiving the property, unless the surviving spouse "otherwise directs by will” (26 USC § 2207A [a] [2]). A special rule governing the apportionment of taxes…”
In Re Est. of Klarner, 98 P.3d 892 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004).
“The parties also agree that Marian's estate may recover federal estate taxes from the QTIP Trust pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 2207A (2002). However, they disagree as to the calculation of that apportionment.”
Hoffman v. Connell, 87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 272 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999).
“(b)(2) 6 ; 26 U.S.C. § 2207A. 7 ) However the fact that statutory reimbursement from the trustees is available tends to show that the estate would be shouldering a tax burden based on assets that Connie did not own.”
Arzt v. Savarese, 36 F. Supp. 2d 653 (D. Del. 1999).
“§ 2207 (Liability of recipient of property over which decedent had power of appointment), and 26 U.S.C. § 2207A (Right of recovery in the case of certain martial deduction property), which spatially precede section 2207B, all have as their effective dates decedent’s dying after…”
Shirley v. Katz, Look & Moison, P.C., 98 P.3d 892 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).
“The parties also agree that Marian's estate may recover federal estate taxes from the QTIP Trust pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 2207A (2002). However, they disagree as to the calculation of that apportionment.”
— 26 U.S.C. § 2207A(a) — 9 cases
Eisenbach v. Schneider, 166 P.3d 858 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
“The court also concluded that they had effectively waived the application of the recovery provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 2207A. Thus, the court concluded that Roy's decision in administering Martha Eisenbach's estate to allocate the burden of estate taxes in accordance with the…”
Eisenbach v. Schneider, 140 Wash. App. 641 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
“The court also concluded that they had effectively waived the application of the recovery provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 2207A. Thus, the court concluded that Roy’s decision in administering Martha Eisenbach’s estate to allocate the burden of estate taxes in accordance with the…”
Firstar Trust Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of Kenosha, 541 N.W.2d 467 (Wis. 1995).
“Cooney (Estate), reimbursement pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 2207A of federal estate taxes and interest from the cross-respondent-petitioner Firstar Trust Company, Trustee (Trust), from the qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) Marital Trust created under the will of Daniel H.”
In Re Est. of Miller, 595 N.E.2d 630 (Ill. App. Ct. 1992).
“The example given in the regulation to illustrate the application of section 2207A of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.A. §2207A (West 1989)) indicates that where a deceased husband’s will created a Q/TIP trust with the income payable to the wife for life and the wife’s will…”
— 26 U.S.C. § 2207A(a)(1) — 2 cases
Firstar Trust Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of Kenosha, 525 N.W.2d 53 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
“The personal representative of Dorothy's estate filed a claim against the beneficiaries of the trust, alleging that pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 2207A(a), the estate was entitled to recover the federal estate tax from the trust.”
Maurice F. Jones Trust v. Barnett Banks, 637 N.E.2d 1301 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994).
“Jones Trust in Louise's estate should be paid by FWNB pursuant to 26 U.S.C.A. § 2207A (1981) of the Internal Revenue Code.”
— 26 U.S.C. § 2207A(a)(2) — 5 cases
Firstar Trust Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of Kenosha, 541 N.W.2d 467 (Wis. 1995).
“Cooney (Estate), reimbursement pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 2207A of federal estate taxes and interest from the cross-respondent-petitioner Firstar Trust Company, Trustee (Trust), from the qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) Marital Trust created under the will of Daniel H.”
In Re Est. of Miller, 595 N.E.2d 630 (Ill. App. Ct. 1992).
“The example given in the regulation to illustrate the application of section 2207A of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.A. §2207A (West 1989)) indicates that where a deceased husband’s will created a Q/TIP trust with the income payable to the wife for life and the wife’s will…”
Firstar Trust Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of Kenosha, 525 N.W.2d 53 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
“The personal representative of Dorothy's estate filed a claim against the beneficiaries of the trust, alleging that pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 2207A(a), the estate was entitled to recover the federal estate tax from the trust.”
— 26 U.S.C. § 2207A(a)(l) — 2 cases
Firstar Trust Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of Kenosha, 541 N.W.2d 467 (Wis. 1995).
“Cooney (Estate), reimbursement pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 2207A of federal estate taxes and interest from the cross-respondent-petitioner Firstar Trust Company, Trustee (Trust), from the qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) Marital Trust created under the will of Daniel H.”
Maurice F. Jones Trust v. Barnett Banks, 637 N.E.2d 1301 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994).
“Jones Trust in Louise's estate should be paid by FWNB pursuant to 26 U.S.C.A. § 2207A (1981) of the Internal Revenue Code.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.