Notes of Decisions
Dan Carman v. Janet Yellen, 112 F.4th 386 (6th Cir. 2024).
· cites it 7× “So when Congress passed amendments to 26 U.S.C. § 6050I, a law that now requires reporting of certain cryptocurrency transactions to the federal government, plaintiffs brought this lawsuit against the United States and the agencies in charge of implementing and enforcing § 6050I.”
United States v. Jimmy D. McGuire, 79 F.3d 1396 (5th Cir. 1996).
· cites it 8× “The three men then discussed at length different methods for evading the filing requirement established by 26 U.S.C. § 6050I. McGuire proposed that Flores and Martinez bring in a third party, who could hand the money to McGuire.”
United States v. McGuire, 99 F.3d 671 (5th Cir. 1996).
· cites it 8× “During the pendency of this appeal, the Supreme Court 1 Title 26 U.S.C. § 6050I requires that cash receipts of more than $10,000 per transaction (or set of related transactions) be reported.”
United States v. Leonard Wisniewski, Jr., 121 F.3d 54 (2d Cir. 1997).
“§ 1956 (a)(3), and six counts of failure to report cash exceeding $10,000 received in a trade or business in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 6050I. 3 He was principally sentenced to 51 months in prison and a subsequent three-year term of supervised release.”
United States v. Sindel, 854 F. Supp. 595 (E.D. Mo. 1994).
· cites it 4× “494, Congress enacted 26 U.S.C. § 6050I. Title 26 U.S.C. § 6050I provides in relevant part: (a) Cash receipts of more than $10,000.”
Mississippi Bar v. McGuire, 694 So. 2d 674 (Miss. 1997).
“The complaint involves McGuire's conviction of the crime of filing a false currency reporting form in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 6050I(f)(1)(B), 7206(1). This Court entered its order on December 15, 1994, granting the Bar's request for indefinite suspension pending appeal.”
United States v. Sabbagh, 98 F. Supp. 2d 680 (D. Md. 2000).
“) Part of the government’s otherwise substantial evidence of the Sab-baghs’ knowledge consisted of the failure of Saba Distributing to file an Internal Revenue Service form 8300 every time it conducted a transaction in which $10,000 or more in cash was received, as required by…”
Carman v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-00149 (E.D. Ky. July 19, 2023).
· cites it 2× “The Amendment to 26 U.S.C. § 6050I Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief against the enforcement of 26 U.”
United States v. Guevara-Lopez, 147 F.4th 1174 (10th Cir. 2025).
· cites it 2× “§§ 7203 (if a violation based on 26 U.S.C. § 6050I), 7206 (if a violation based on 26 U.”
Lewis v. Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia, No. 2:25-cv-03870 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 30, 2025).
· cites it 2× “Lewis claims that the Casino violated the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”)3 requirements codified at 26 U.S.C. § 6050I and its implementing regulations at 31 C.”
Carman, No. 5:22-cv-00149 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 22, 2026).
· cites it 2× “) Under 26 U.S.C. § 6050I, individuals engaged in a trade or business who receive $10,000 or more in “cash” must file a report (a “§ 6050I report”) with the Treasury Department.”
26 U.S.C. § 6050I(a): 4 cases
Dan Carman v. Janet Yellen, 112 F.4th 386 (6th Cir. 2024).
“So when Congress passed amendments to 26 U.S.C. § 6050I, a law that now requires reporting of certain cryptocurrency transactions to the federal government, plaintiffs brought this lawsuit against the United States and the agencies in charge of implementing and enforcing § 6050I.”
Carman v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-00149 (E.D. Ky. July 19, 2023).
“The Amendment to 26 U.S.C. § 6050I Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief against the enforcement of 26 U.”
26 U.S.C. § 6050I(b): 2 cases
Dan Carman v. Janet Yellen, 112 F.4th 386 (6th Cir. 2024).
“So when Congress passed amendments to 26 U.S.C. § 6050I, a law that now requires reporting of certain cryptocurrency transactions to the federal government, plaintiffs brought this lawsuit against the United States and the agencies in charge of implementing and enforcing § 6050I.”
Carman, No. 5:22-cv-00149 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 22, 2026).
“) Under 26 U.S.C. § 6050I, individuals engaged in a trade or business who receive $10,000 or more in “cash” must file a report (a “§ 6050I report”) with the Treasury Department.”
26 U.S.C. § 6050I(d)(1): 1 case
Dan Carman v. Janet Yellen, 112 F.4th 386 (6th Cir. 2024).
“So when Congress passed amendments to 26 U.S.C. § 6050I, a law that now requires reporting of certain cryptocurrency transactions to the federal government, plaintiffs brought this lawsuit against the United States and the agencies in charge of implementing and enforcing § 6050I.”
26 U.S.C. § 6050I(d)(3): 1 case
Dan Carman v. Janet Yellen, 112 F.4th 386 (6th Cir. 2024).
“So when Congress passed amendments to 26 U.S.C. § 6050I, a law that now requires reporting of certain cryptocurrency transactions to the federal government, plaintiffs brought this lawsuit against the United States and the agencies in charge of implementing and enforcing § 6050I.”
26 U.S.C. § 6050I(e): 2 cases
Dan Carman v. Janet Yellen, 112 F.4th 386 (6th Cir. 2024).
“So when Congress passed amendments to 26 U.S.C. § 6050I, a law that now requires reporting of certain cryptocurrency transactions to the federal government, plaintiffs brought this lawsuit against the United States and the agencies in charge of implementing and enforcing § 6050I.”
26 U.S.C. § 6050I(f): 1 case
26 U.S.C. § 6050I(f)(1)(B): 4 cases
United States v. Jimmy D. McGuire, 79 F.3d 1396 (5th Cir. 1996).
“The three men then discussed at length different methods for evading the filing requirement established by 26 U.S.C. § 6050I. McGuire proposed that Flores and Martinez bring in a third party, who could hand the money to McGuire.”
United States v. McGuire, 99 F.3d 671 (5th Cir. 1996).
“During the pendency of this appeal, the Supreme Court 1 Title 26 U.S.C. § 6050I requires that cash receipts of more than $10,000 per transaction (or set of related transactions) be reported.”
Mississippi Bar v. McGuire, 694 So. 2d 674 (Miss. 1997).
“The complaint involves McGuire's conviction of the crime of filing a false currency reporting form in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 6050I(f)(1)(B), 7206(1). This Court entered its order on December 15, 1994, granting the Bar's request for indefinite suspension pending appeal.”
26 U.S.C. § 6050I(f)(2): 2 cases
United States v. Jimmy D. McGuire, 79 F.3d 1396 (5th Cir. 1996).
“The three men then discussed at length different methods for evading the filing requirement established by 26 U.S.C. § 6050I. McGuire proposed that Flores and Martinez bring in a third party, who could hand the money to McGuire.”
United States v. McGuire, 99 F.3d 671 (5th Cir. 1996).
“During the pendency of this appeal, the Supreme Court 1 Title 26 U.S.C. § 6050I requires that cash receipts of more than $10,000 per transaction (or set of related transactions) be reported.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.