27 U.S.C. § 216
Preemption
No statement relating to alcoholic beverages and health, other than the statement required by section 215 of this title, shall be required under State law to be placed on any container of an alcoholic beverage, or on any box, carton, or other package, irrespective of the material from which made, that contains such a container.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1991–2012 · leading case: Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly, 95 P.3d 422 (Cal. 2004).
Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly, 95 P.3d 422 (Cal. 2004). “§ 213 ), further provided expressly for federal preemption of such health warnings on alcoholic beverage labels: “No statement relating to alcoholic beverages and health, other than the statement required by section 215 of this title, shall be required under State law to be…”
Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. McGuire, 814 S.W.2d 385 (Tex. 1991). “” 27 U.S.C.A. § 216 (Supp.1990). Since we determine that the danger of developing the disease of alcoholism from prolonged and excessive consumption of alcoholic beverages is a matter of common knowledge such that Seagram had no duty to warn or instruct as to that danger, it is…”
Brown Forman Corp. v. Brune, 893 S.W.2d 640 (Tex. App. 1995). “27 U.S.C.A. § 216 (West Supp.1994). Additionally, civil penalties may be imposed for violators of the act and the district courts of the United States are vested with jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violators of the act.”
Cook v. MillerCoors, LLC, 872 F. Supp. 2d 1346 (M.D. Fla. 2012). “The Cuevas court noted that the warnings required by the Alcoholic Beverage Labeling Act (ABLA), 27 U.S.C. § 216 , refer to “health risks associated with consuming or abusing alcohol — e.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.